|
From: Patrick O. <pat...@gm...> - 2011-01-04 13:32:09
|
On Di, 2011-01-04 at 14:11 +0100, Daniel Gollub wrote: > Currently i don't see syncevolutaion is replacing OpenSync today. Maybe it > will some when in the future. Maybe not. It could disappear like other Sync > approaches due to various reasons. I'm not going to declare OpenSync as dead. > I highly recommend that OpenSync (Plugin) Developers decide by their own if > syncevoluation is a better alternative for them or not. It would be pretty > ignorant to say anything different. Fair enough. I've made my point, what kind of conclusions anyone draws from it is that person's own choice. I'll answer the open questions about SyncEvolution on the SyncEvolution mailing list and stop copying the OpenSync list. -- Bye, Patrick Ohly -- Pat...@gm... http://www.estamos.de/ |