Re: [Opensync-devel] SyncML's sustainability

[deloptes <del...@ya...>]

Quentin Denis wrote:

> Is noone else responding to this thread? Is nobody else concerned with my
> reported bug? Armin, Michael, how do you feel about the current syncml
> plugin? I don't suggest to move to libsynthesis, but could libsyncml be at
> least as capable then?
> 
> As long as there is no fix for my issue, opensync is pretty useless for
> me. I won't continue my contribution if I don't see in foreseeable future
> a private use of opensync.
> 
> The only alternative for me would be to use the depricated gnokii plugin
> which is even not ported to 0.40.
> 
> Sorry for putting some pressure but I am getting dubious about opensync's
> development and capability to fix the bugs encountered by users.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Quentin
> 

+1.

I also doubt that it has been ported to 0.40. Does someone has used it
successfully?

Also the responding on our question or the lack of such responses is
unacceptable if devs here want help.

I guess you have to cc them so that they pay attention.

... Obviously people are not willing to sync with linux systems. Or it is
google conspiracy, so their sync would be preferred, to give them your
contacts, schedules etc for free. I'm wondering why we use encryption and
password protection then ... aaah yes, so that other users may not get
hands on it.