Re: [Opensync-devel] akonadi-sync (discussion)

[deloptes <del...@ya...>]

deloptes wrote:

> I have also noticed (in the original code) that there was a hash table in
> use. The code needs to be rewritten, as Chris said, it is managed
> inernally by the library.
> I had a look into the barry code and it also uses hashtables to manage the
> syncs. As for akonadi I'm not sure if it is required. I believe I read it
> can track changes of items internally. According osync docs a hash table
> is not required in this case.
> What can you tell me about this topic and the issue below?

I think I found the issue:
akonadi_opensync(22547) DataSink::initialize: Sink wrapped:  note
Main sink of member 2 of type akonadi-sync just connected
note sink of member 2 of type akonadi-sync just connected
event sink of member 2 of type akonadi-sync just connected
contact sink of member 2 of type akonadi-sync just connected
Main sink of member 1 of type evo2-sync just connected
note sink of member 1 of type evo2-sync just connected
event sink of member 1 of type evo2-sync just connected
contact sink of member 1 of type evo2-sync just connected