Re: [Opensync-devel] Updating the wiki and fixing bugs

[Juha T. <Juh...@ik...>]

On Wednesday 15 September 2010 12:11:21 Chris Frey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:36:48AM +0300, Juha Tuomala wrote:
> > We had such blurp for long time and for reason. denisq during his 
> > front page editing hosed 
> > 
> > http://opensync.org/wiki/WikiStart?action=diff&version=139&old_version=138
> > 
> > is for some reason, my guess is that he thought that makes opensync sound 
> > like unfinished - something that it is.
> 
> I don't think such a blurb needs to be on the front page.
> Under the "development version", yes.

It was decided quite some time ago that it needed to be there.
 
> Quentin has done good work, and given the front page a much needed
> facelift.

Yes he has. let's just not forget, that opensync project's deliverable
is only library - much like glibc.

> If others care enough to do the work, and good work at that,
> why complain about it?  We *need* someone to take care of the wiki.

Shall we not mix complaining and argumenting with valid points please.

That was put there because we were worried that people were 
associating dataloss and opensync to each other. And actually also
worried that it *is* possible to lose information. It's hard to notice 
that from phone interface if you have few hundred entries and some 
of them have lost some field's content.

There is a reason why 0.2x branch was ditched, why the 0.4 has not been 
released yet, just like dgollub already pointed out in earlier message.


Tuju

-- 
Better to have one, and not need it, than to need one and not have it.