|
From: Juha T. <Juh...@ik...> - 2010-09-15 08:37:00
|
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 10:26:45 Chris Frey wrote: > Can you write a quick warning blurb in reply, that we can use on the wiki? > Something that includes what functionality is missing, so that developers > might be tempted to fix it. > > A page on the wiki that points to binary packages for testing purposes > would be helpful, and should have such a warning for all to see. > Quentin or I can set that up. We had such blurp for long time and for reason. denisq during his front page editing hosed http://opensync.org/wiki/WikiStart?action=diff&version=139&old_version=138 is for some reason, my guess is that he thought that makes opensync sound like unfinished - something that it is. The fact is that until those folks who can write those missing core parts, there is not that much that others can do. Removing that warning label from front page is just going to make people upset again what it did earlier and why it was put there in the first place. Loosing your valuable contacts during your first attempt of backuping with opensync is something that I would get pissed off too. My question is, what is the gain from having anyone to log in and change wiki compared to manually created accounts? It would kill spamming that we've been targeted for years at least. I've a feeling that nobody of old farts is looking after what goes on in wiki these days. Tuju -- Better to have one, and not need it, than to need one and not have it. |