|
From: Chris F. <cd...@fo...> - 2010-09-15 07:36:18
|
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:22:28AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > It is not out of date, it is the currently released development release, > as far as I know. Also 0.22, is still in the stable release, it is not > gone from Debian entirely, just from testing/unstable. (There was talk > about reviving 0.22 just for the python plugins, which apparently seem > to work well for some people still, but I did not get around it so far, > and with the freeze in effect I doubt it is doable) If 0.22 could return to Squeeze, that would be great. Let me know how I can help, because that would make my life easier. > We could package subversion snapshots as well, but for the first part of > 2010, I was not aware of any major advances in opensync which would have > warranted that. I think it is less about progress made or not, and more about having an automated system for creating binary packages for people who just want to run a quick test and help developers. > Note that libopensync1exp* has to be manually approved for each new > version right now as the API keeps changing and so does the package > name, so I am not sure very frequent uploads make that much sense. That's something I didn't know... so perhaps Debian unstable is the wrong place to do this package work. It is just a prime target, because Debian is a great place to get software. :-) When I saw 0.39, I assumed great things. > There's no danger of Debian shipping 0.3x in the next stable release, at > least :) :-) - Chris |