|
From: Juha T. <Juh...@ik...> - 2010-03-16 13:27:24
|
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Chris Frey wrote: > Before you can have a community, you need one dedicated developer. > Unfortunately, nobody has any dedicated time for opensync, that I know of. > > It doesn't matter if 0.22 is out there or not. If 0.39 was better, > people would be using it. You mention slow sync problems in 0.22. > Are all your problems solved in 0.39? > > If the user can avoid the slow sync, or if the user always knows that > one side will be authoritative, 0.22 does work. It's not convenient, > but it can be wrestled and scripted into submission. Too many *if* words. Or enough of them. > There is no need to kill 0.22 to make 0.40 succeed. There are no > developers on 0.22 or 0.40 right now. And my talking about it isn't > getting any code written either. > > I think that if neither 0.22 nor 0.40 are available to the end user > on Debian, opensync might not even be considered when looking for > syncing solutions. For the record, I disagree completely. Tuju -- You want to throw out the baby with the bathwater! - K. Kofler Your baby is my bathwater. I don't want the OS you're building. - J. Keating |