Re: [Opensync-devel] opensync and Debian

[Chris F. <cd...@fo...>]

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:17:28AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Does anybody else see another way forward?

This is really unfortunate.  An external dependency is killing 0.22
when we've put real effort into making it possible to run 0.22 and
0.40 side by side.

Trying to kill 0.22 because it's old is the wrong way to go, in my opinion.
The only way to properly kill 0.22 is by making 0.40 better.  And if
all those plugins have to go, 0.40 is not yet better.

Remember Fedora's error.  I have no problem with 0.40 being in testing
and unstable.  I do have a problem with 0.22 dying before a proper
replacement is ready.

What is missing in libsyncml that 0.22 can't work with it?  I'm afraid
I'm not up to speed on the syncml side of things.

- Chris