|
From: Bjoern R. <bjo...@go...> - 2010-01-10 12:56:44
|
taking part at the KDE PIM meeting was quite a good motivation to restart working on OpenSync and to write some mails on the list. It isn't good that the communication stopped at the last month again. First I would like to say that OpenSync is still not dead and that's Daniels opinion too. Because of my new job I am going to participate in porting KDE PIM (especially akonadi) to mobile platforms. Therefore I am really sure that there will be an OpenSync plugin for akonadi in the future ;-) The KDE PIM guys haven't decided to use any other sync solution (e.g. SyncEvolution) yet. So OpenSync still has a chance to be THE sync solution on KDE desktops (and also on mobiles). But I would like to discuss how we as the opensync community can speed up development and which things/bugs of the current development cycle are important. The current issues can be found at http://opensync.org/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&group=status&milestone=OpenSync+0.40 See the most important issues fixes asap would be a big step forward but I completely lost the overview which features are important and have to be fixes to get the plugins back on track. I guess e.g. that the syncml plugin doesn't work without fixing the guid mapping bug http://opensync.org/ticket/1105 Which bugs have also to be fixed to get an opensync version that is usable? What's the current status of the capabilities? I have in mind that it does only work for one objtype but I am not sure. It would also be great if we can collect some opinions why we lost so much people again and again and how to improve that. I do have an opinion and also some reasons about that but I really don't want to see that there is no discussion on the list and in the irc if Daniel and me can't spend time to write code. regards Bjoern |