Re: [Opensync-devel] why long long?

[Henrik /K. <he...@ka...>]

Chris Frey wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 01:39:08PM +0200, Henrik /KaarPoSoft wrote:
>   
>> If we really want to stick to the frozen interface, we could use gint64
>> http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/stable/glib-Basic-Types.html#gint64
>>     
>
> That would be worse in my opinion.
>
> long long is standard C99, it's just C++ that has trouble with it for now.
> The reason I brought it up was because it seemed silly to stretch
> C and C++ standards for values that rarely go above 2.
>
> - Chris
>   
I agree - it was just a "quick and dirty" if we really want to stick to 
frozen API.
In my opinion the best solution would to break API and change long long 
to long.

/Henrik