|
From: Martin O. <doc...@gm...> - 2009-10-19 12:35:35
|
Hey Paul, Perhaps the problem is that the opensync project has attempted to solve too many problems in the same framework? * Data Access * Data Formating * Synchronisation Logic It would have probably have been a better idea if each of those problems had been solved separately but in ways that made them core components to the operating systems and perhaps in ways that made their extension trivial. Ubuntu still does not ship with any synchronisation functionality because compounding all problems into one project has made the entire thing a huge non-trivial problem. But perhaps it's too late now, I'm resined to the fact that I will never have good sync support and that every front end app will have poorly written data access, formating and syncing and the OS will never have anything definitive. Why are we trying to solve these problems? was it wise to write something that needed to be rewritten several times, whilst supporting obsolete versions and fracturing development effort and sapping the will of extension developers? I question the choices made in this project. Martin |