From: Graham C. <g+o...@co...> - 2009-09-29 11:40:33
|
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 12:01:18 Michael Bell wrote: > This bug exists for a long time and I think that the limit is not > configurable today. So the bug must be fixed (e.g. by a configurable > limit which is much bigger than 5 by default). I will check in a workround (either disable the check or make it a large number) today. A real fix will take a while longer. Graham |