Re: [Opensync-devel] dual installs of 0.22 and 0.4x

[Chris F. <cd...@fo...>]

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 02:40:51PM +0300, Juh...@ik... wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Chris Frey wrote:
> > 	- HOME config
> > 		0.22: ~/.opensync
> > 		0.40: ~/.opensync
> >
> > I like the suggestion in #890.  At least the 0.40 directory.  Even a
> > ~/.libopensync1 directory would be good... actually that's probably best.
> 
> Please, keep the versions under the .opensync dir if this gets
> implmented. There is already enough kakofonia in users' home dirs
> let's make sure that we don't add that mess.

I don't care too much either way, as long as the defaults are separate.


> Also, it doesn't come into my mind, that what other lib would have
> it's so-name also in dotdir name. Why not keep it as more intuitive
> like plain .opensync is? That's what users see and the package 
> versions, not the so names or any symbol names either.

I wasn't thinking in terms of the user accessing this directory so much,
but it's a good point.  I was thinking in programmer terms. :-)

- Chris