Re: [Opensync-users] Problem with USB Sniffeours

[Daniel G. <dg...@su...>]

On Friday 19 December 2008 11:00:47 Habib Seifzadeh wrote:
> > > > > Second question is that which tool does listen to USB port and
> > > > > returns the results as an XML(no binary format)? For example,
> > > > > usb-monitor is a powerful application. I could set it so that it
> > > > > listened to all of above four ports, then I synced my mobile, the
> > > > > tool generated the results but in binary format :-(,
> > > >
> > > > Any possibility to copy&paste the traffic in hex?
> > > > Isn't there any export function - even HTML would be fine :P
> > >
> > > Dear Daniel,
> > > I
> > > finally could get data from the traffic. The attached file contains the
> > > traffic information in 3 views (URB Basic View, URB Complete View,
> > > Packet View).
> > > I hope it can help. Please let me know if you find the problem....
> >
> > Thanks - brief check: SE is not using OBEX at all.. it's all SyncML 1.2
> > via HTTP in WBXML :(
>
> Dear Daniel,
> Using either OBEX or HTTP isn't important for me at all. But why the
> command syncml-http-server doesn't work with P1i?

I see - but OBEX is easier for Desktop Distribution to integrate. Setting-up 
IP connection with a mobile is not yet that trivial today..

How did you establish the IP connection?

>
> > It's again a Teleca SyncML stack... this is also used on various Samsung
> > mobiles. It would be interesting to try some on OBEX - if this works at
> > all... but not quite sure if it's worth the pain - maybe it's completley
> > broken and never tested by Teleca/SE.
>
> Can we use a special software written for Samsung in this case?

There is already one major different of Samsung and the SE on the OBEX 
interface. Samsung does everything via the DUN interface - SE provides via 
Bluetotoh a direct OBEX interface for SyncML - so there is already a major 
difference. IIRC there used to be issues that the "Database"-name of the PC-
side needs to reflect the same name as the one from the mobile for some 
reason. At least i had to do so for some Telecal Samsungs mobile sometime 
ago... but again not quite sure if it's worth a try. Direct Access to such a 
phone would be more helpful...

best regards,
Daniel