From: Juha T. <Juh...@ik...> - 2008-11-19 17:33:43
|
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 19:22:02 Martin Owens wrote: > On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 17:15 +0000, Chris Carr wrote: > > Just wanted to chime in and say to Dotan that you're not alone - I too have > > just arrived that the conclusion that I'm fed up with Nokia's windows > > bloat-suite and I want to get opensync working for me, and I too am not a > > programmer. > > How goes integration work into the hardware layers? I haven't heard much > about how opensync is going to work in the future when you plug in > various devices or pair them up bluz wise. It has already been decided that libopensync is a sync engine tying format and connection plugins together. Other projects are free to implement upper layers and utilize libopensync as such engine. Go to http://www.ohloh.net/ and compare opensync with for example Apache. This is not a small project and community/manpower to develop is way much smaller than other similar sized projects. Hopefully that will change somewhat once we have more polished product. > Or are the systems not yet in place for this kind of integration? I've > been trying to push libbarry (blackberry support) to getting HAL device > capabilities listed. Not sure. I do know that there are projects that somewhat overlap with this, implementing their own sync engine and GUI, all those hw detection layers etc. But imo it's good to have stuff in smaller chunks and keep simple interfaces between those. Tuju -- Varo hattupäisiä autoilijoita. |