Re: [OpenSTA-devel] Alternate GUI for OpenSTA?
Brought to you by:
dansut
|
From: Antony M. \(e. associates\)
<ant...@et...> - 2006-06-12 21:26:30
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: co...@go... > > Hey Antony, > I was hoping you'd show up here :) [Antony Marcano] Glad to oblige :-) > Well I am writing a document that goes into some detail on what I have > done so > far.. basically I have had 2 marathon hacking weekends working on this, > and > thats all. It wasn't until 2 night ago that I even realized the stuff I'm > working on was applicable for use with OpenSTA. [Antony Marcano] Cool! Look forward to reading about it > I meant in terms of dynamically typed and interpreted (though the > definition of > "interpreted" and "compiled" is so blurred these days i'm not sure that > even > means anything). [Antony Marcano] Fair enough. > > > > I'd encourage choosing the language carefully, however. It should be > based > > on the best one for the task. If Python is the language then great! But > it > > shouldn't be based on familiarity... > > absolutely.. if others have ideas, I'd love to discuss them. I have lots > of > ideas regarding language selection and would happy to elaborate on my > thoughts. [Antony Marcano] That's why I tried to start a list of categories to help the short list (see previous e-mail). > well.. right now as far as I can tell, the developer community is mostly > dormant > except for a trickle of bug reports and patches.. nothing is really going > on (or > has anything beyond the opensta-devel discussions been done?). So, if a > process > of language selection and architecture is done.. who is willing to > implement the > chosen design? If people are out there watching this list and want to get > involved, please speak up. I'm sure we all have our ideas about languages > and > methodologies and how development should be done. We went through that > excersize a few years back but nothing much came of it. Perhaps things > have > changed and it is worthwhile to explore again. I would be happy to > participate > in that process. However, once that concludes, people need to throw down > and > start writing code... we never made it there last time. [Antony Marcano] Sounds like a plan. Perhaps, if we get a short-list, we might then be able to spike a couple of approaches to get a better feel. > > What I am saying is that I have something built.. working code. Whether > or not > this is an implementation that others want to collaborate on and extend.. > or > feel should be part of the future of OpenSTA.. is another story :) I am > working on something unrelated to OpenSTA and will have a a full GUI > framework > for parsing logs, creating time series, running numerical calculations, > and > graphic output. I was able to adapt it to work with OpenSTA timer logs in > < 10 > lines of code. So this is going to be available.. and it's in Python ;) > sort > of independent to discussions by the opensta-devel community. [Antony Marcano] Cool... if nothing else it prompted this discussion... If I am honest, I am pushed to the limit in my day-to-day life at the moment but happy to throw my 2 pence/cents worth in once in a while if it helps in any small way. Antony |