Re: [OpenSPP-project] Conclude on license: Apache 2.0?

[Jeremy B. \(Digitalshtick\) <je...@di...>]

Hi Dean,

Apache 2.0 seems fine...
It is considered more permissive than the GNU licenses [ Apache does not
have "copyleft"]  - but it does have a patent license clause.
Certainly makes sense for OpenSPP

Jeremy


-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Willis [mailto:dea...@so...] 
Sent: 01 June 2011 19:02
To: ope...@li...
Subject: [OpenSPP-project] Conclude on license: Apache 2.0?



We need to nail down which Open Source license we'll use.

I initially favored Modified BSD, but it looks like we're using a lot of
Apache-licensed code in our architecture. This suggests we use the Apache
2.0 license:

http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html

Any objections?

--
Dean
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger.

Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe,
secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic?
Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
OpenSPP-project mailing list
Ope...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openspp-project