opensipstack-osbcdevel — Discussions on OpenSBC

[OpenSBC] Unstable 100rel/PRACK related code

[Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...>]

Hi Everyone,

I just want to warn everybody who downloaded source codes from 
yesterdays CVS head up to this time that a partial patch has been 
committed to CVS related to reliable provisional response (RFC 3262) 
support.  The said patch is known to crash the IST FSM and is not safe 
for production use.  I should be able to provide the final stable patch 
within the next 24 hours.

Joegen

Re: [OpenSBC] REDIRECT functionality and LOCATION Service

[Chandra S. A. <cag...@ve...>]

Joegen,

Thanks for your response. 

For location service I intended to know if OpenSBC has interfaces t query a
remote database and get the results or it can query a local database only?

Please apprise me with your answer.

TIA,
CS


-----Original Message-----
From: ope...@li...
[mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of
Joegen E. Baclor
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 10:33 AM
To: ope...@li...
Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] REDIRECT functionality and LOCATION Service

Chandra Shekhar Agrawal wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
>  
>
> I am a new OpenSBC user and need some basic information. Please help 
> me with the following doubts:
>
>  
>
> 1. Does it support REDIRECT functionality?
>


Yes it does.   The following entry in B2BUA Route should redirect the 
call instead

[sip:613*] sip:61...@fw...;action="redirect"


> 2. Does it support only co-located "location service"? Or it has 
> provision for remote access also?
>

I am not sure what you mean by "location service" here....  Please 
elaborate.


>  
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> CS
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* ope...@li... 
> [mailto:ope...@li...] *On 
> Behalf Of *Jonas Gauffin
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 02, 2007 8:30 PM
> *To:* ope...@li...
> *Subject:* [OpenSBC] Couple of questions
>
>  
>
> Hello
>
> I've been checking OpenSBC and got a couple of questions.
>
> I can provide my own configuration by implementing a XML-RPC server, 
> right?
> But what if I just want to provide the routing information when it's 
> requested (when a new call arrives)?
>
> I want to do the same with UA authentication (REGISTER). I want to 
> lookup the
> account/password when the REGISTER transaction is received.
>
> I want to monitor all calls on each UA (to always have the current 
> state of a UA (as in busy/free)). What is the best way to do that?
> How do I control calls that UA's have? (like put them on hold, 
> disconnect etc)
>
> Last question is about IVR. How do I create different IVR 
> applications? I've tried to figure out how SBCIVRHandler is invoked, 
> but it's lot of code to dig in.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated,
>   Jonas
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.13/1165 - Release Date:
12/2/2007 8:34 PM
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
Ope...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel

Re: [OpenSBC] An enhanced HTTP Config Module for OpenSBC

[Jonas G. <jon...@gm...>]

I would use a SQL backend and do #3.

On Dec 3, 2007 4:42 AM, Joegen E. Baclor <joe...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As I have hinted in the past, there is a plan to provide a new level of
> administrative interface for OpenSBC.  As most of you might have
> discovered by now, OpenSBC is very easy to install and requires
> virtually no configuration for you to be able to run and use it.   This
> is all because of a built-in HTTP server that allows for OpenSBC to be
> configured remotely.   However, since version 1.1.4 and with the
> introduction of more advanced features like SIP Trunking, the built-in
> HTTP Config Pages is out-growing its simplicity.    We are now in a
> point where we need to decide what technology to use to bring the
> configuration modules to the next level.    We need to seriously
> consider the following criteria in choosing the solution.
>
> 1.  It should be very easy to install and package
> 2.  Built-in access to back-end databases preferably Postgress
> 3.  Must be able to host Dynamic HTML Content
> 4.  Other criteria that might be useful are support for XML-RPC and SOAP
>
>
> Some of the basic choices that I pulled out straight from my thoughts are
>
> 1.  A separate web interface easily installable as standard Apache Web
> application.  Choices are PHP, JSP Ruby with SQL back-end
> 2.  Stand-alone Python HTTP Server just like the trac project.  See
> http://trac.edgewall.org/
> 3.  Enhance the HTTP Admin to support Fast-CGI extension to allow for
> dynamic HTTP content to be hosted straight by OpenSBC
>
> I would want to hear from everyone if you are leaning towards a certain
> approach or would want another approach altogether.
>
> Joegen
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>

Re: [OpenSBC] Couple of questions

[Jonas G. <jon...@gm...>]

thank you for your answer.

> > But what if I just want to provide the routing information when it's
> > requested (when a new call arrives)?
> >
> > I want to do the same with UA authentication (REGISTER). I want to
> > lookup the
> > account/password when the REGISTER transaction is received.
> Work is currently in progress to introduce diameter support in OpenSBC.
> You could provide route and auth info to OpenSBC by implementing a
> diameter server.   We are expecting this feature to be included in
> version 1.1.6
>

You have a roadmap on the development page, but I guess it's for the
stack itself.
When is 1.1.6 going to be released? Is 1.1.6 that is currently being developed?

>
> >
> > I want to monitor all calls on each UA (to always have the current
> > state of a UA (as in busy/free)). What is the best way to do that?
> > How do I control calls that UA's have? (like put them on hold,
> > disconnect etc)
>
> That feature is a switchboard feature and should be a functionality of a
> PBX and not an SBC.
>

I know. I'm thinking about creating a PBX on top of SBC.

>
> >
> >
> > Last question is about IVR. How do I create different IVR
> > applications? I've tried to figure out how SBCIVRHandler is invoked,
> > but it's lot of code to dig in.
> >
>
> You have looked at the right place.  I believe the IVR handler is one of
> the easiest to understand among all the OSBC handlers.   There is
> currently work being done to have OpenSBC support VXML via openVXI.
> This should be out with 1.1.6 as well.
>

When is the IVRHandler invoked, and for what numbers?
And how do I know which number the current session was invoked for?

Re: [OpenSBC] REDIRECT functionality and LOCATION Service

[Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...>]

Chandra Shekhar Agrawal wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
>  
>
> I am a new OpenSBC user and need some basic information. Please help 
> me with the following doubts:
>
>  
>
> 1. Does it support REDIRECT functionality?
>


Yes it does.   The following entry in B2BUA Route should redirect the 
call instead

[sip:613*] sip:61...@fw...;action="redirect"


> 2. Does it support only co-located "location service"? Or it has 
> provision for remote access also?
>

I am not sure what you mean by "location service" here....  Please 
elaborate.


>  
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> CS
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* ope...@li... 
> [mailto:ope...@li...] *On 
> Behalf Of *Jonas Gauffin
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 02, 2007 8:30 PM
> *To:* ope...@li...
> *Subject:* [OpenSBC] Couple of questions
>
>  
>
> Hello
>
> I've been checking OpenSBC and got a couple of questions.
>
> I can provide my own configuration by implementing a XML-RPC server, 
> right?
> But what if I just want to provide the routing information when it's 
> requested (when a new call arrives)?
>
> I want to do the same with UA authentication (REGISTER). I want to 
> lookup the
> account/password when the REGISTER transaction is received.
>
> I want to monitor all calls on each UA (to always have the current 
> state of a UA (as in busy/free)). What is the best way to do that?
> How do I control calls that UA's have? (like put them on hold, 
> disconnect etc)
>
> Last question is about IVR. How do I create different IVR 
> applications? I've tried to figure out how SBCIVRHandler is invoked, 
> but it's lot of code to dig in.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated,
>   Jonas
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.13/1165 - Release Date: 12/2/2007 8:34 PM
>   

[OpenSBC] REDIRECT functionality and LOCATION Service

[Chandra S. A. <cag...@ve...>]

Guys,

 

I am a new OpenSBC user and need some basic information. Please help me with
the following doubts:

 

1. Does it support REDIRECT functionality?

2. Does it support only co-located "location service"? Or it has provision
for remote access also?

 

Thanks in advance,

CS

 

  _____  

From: ope...@li...
[mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of
Jonas Gauffin
Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2007 8:30 PM
To: ope...@li...
Subject: [OpenSBC] Couple of questions

 

Hello

I've been checking OpenSBC and got a couple of questions.

I can provide my own configuration by implementing a XML-RPC server, right?
But what if I just want to provide the routing information when it's
requested (when a new call arrives)? 

I want to do the same with UA authentication (REGISTER). I want to lookup
the
account/password when the REGISTER transaction is received.

I want to monitor all calls on each UA (to always have the current state of
a UA (as in busy/free)). What is the best way to do that? 
How do I control calls that UA's have? (like put them on hold, disconnect
etc) 

Last question is about IVR. How do I create different IVR applications? I've
tried to figure out how SBCIVRHandler is invoked, but it's lot of code to
dig in.

Any help would be greatly appreciated, 
  Jonas

[OpenSBC] An enhanced HTTP Config Module for OpenSBC

[Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...>]

Hi Everyone,

As I have hinted in the past, there is a plan to provide a new level of 
administrative interface for OpenSBC.  As most of you might have 
discovered by now, OpenSBC is very easy to install and requires 
virtually no configuration for you to be able to run and use it.   This 
is all because of a built-in HTTP server that allows for OpenSBC to be 
configured remotely.   However, since version 1.1.4 and with the 
introduction of more advanced features like SIP Trunking, the built-in 
HTTP Config Pages is out-growing its simplicity.    We are now in a 
point where we need to decide what technology to use to bring the 
configuration modules to the next level.    We need to seriously 
consider the following criteria in choosing the solution.

1.  It should be very easy to install and package
2.  Built-in access to back-end databases preferably Postgress
3.  Must be able to host Dynamic HTML Content
4.  Other criteria that might be useful are support for XML-RPC and SOAP


Some of the basic choices that I pulled out straight from my thoughts are

1.  A separate web interface easily installable as standard Apache Web 
application.  Choices are PHP, JSP Ruby with SQL back-end
2.  Stand-alone Python HTTP Server just like the trac project.  See 
http://trac.edgewall.org/
3.  Enhance the HTTP Admin to support Fast-CGI extension to allow for 
dynamic HTTP content to be hosted straight by OpenSBC

I would want to hear from everyone if you are leaning towards a certain 
approach or would want another approach altogether.

Joegen

Re: [OpenSBC] Couple of questions

[Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...>]

Joegen E. Baclor wrote:
> inline...
>
> Jonas Gauffin wrote:
>   
>> Hello
>>
>> I've been checking OpenSBC and got a couple of questions.
>>
>> I can provide my own configuration by implementing a XML-RPC server, 
>> right?
>>     
>
> Close but not quite.    OpenSBC allows you to design your own config 
> pages by providing XML-RPC hooks so an external web interface maybe able 
> to edit config info outside of OpenSBC Config Pages.  OpenSBC will still 
> fetch information locally.
>
>   

Let me take that back.   You may indeed create your own XML-RPC server 
by implementing the methods found in OSSAppConfig::InitXMLRPC().  There 
is not much has been said and written about this easter egg in OpenSBC.  
I am impressed that you went this deep to figure it out.   I am 
currently contemplating on introducing a real SQL Database to OpenSBC.   
I wonder if this is a popular wish item.   Feel free to comment on it.

    RegisterMethod( "Config.GetListItem" );
    RegisterMethod( "Config.SetListItem" );
    RegisterMethod( "Config.AppendListItem" );
    RegisterMethod( "Config.GetListSize" );
    RegisterMethod( "Config.GetString" );
    RegisterMethod( "Config.SetString" );
    RegisterMethod( "Config.GetInteger" );
    RegisterMethod( "Config.SetInteger" );
    RegisterMethod( "Config.GetBoolean" );
    RegisterMethod( "Config.SetBoolean" );
    RegisterMethod( "Config.Subscribe" );
    RegisterMethod( "Config.Changed" );


>> But what if I just want to provide the routing information when it's 
>> requested (when a new call arrives)?
>>
>> I want to do the same with UA authentication (REGISTER). I want to 
>> lookup the
>> account/password when the REGISTER transaction is received.
>>     
> Work is currently in progress to introduce diameter support in OpenSBC.  
> You could provide route and auth info to OpenSBC by implementing a 
> diameter server.   We are expecting this feature to be included in 
> version 1.1.6
>
>   
>> I want to monitor all calls on each UA (to always have the current 
>> state of a UA (as in busy/free)). What is the best way to do that?
>> How do I control calls that UA's have? (like put them on hold, 
>> disconnect etc)
>>     
>
> That feature is a switchboard feature and should be a functionality of a 
> PBX and not an SBC.
>
>   
>> Last question is about IVR. How do I create different IVR 
>> applications? I've tried to figure out how SBCIVRHandler is invoked, 
>> but it's lot of code to dig in.
>>
>>     
>
> You have looked at the right place.  I believe the IVR handler is one of 
> the easiest to understand among all the OSBC handlers.   There is 
> currently work being done to have OpenSBC support VXML via openVXI.   
> This should be out with 1.1.6 as well.
>
>
>   
>> Any help would be greatly appreciated,
>>   Jonas
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
>> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
>> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
>> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
>> Ope...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>>   
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
>> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.10/1160 - Release Date: 11/29/2007 8:32 PM
>>   
>>     
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>
>
>   

Re: [OpenSBC] RFC 3398 SIP-T with encapsulate ISUP message

[Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...>]

SIP-T support requires a very big change in the SIP Parser to support 
binary data to be attached with a multi-part body.   This feature is 
planned to be supported and would be expected to be in the pipeline.  I 
just do not know when exactly.

ehernaez wrote:
> OSBC is not currently SIP-T compliant.   This is on our radar screen, but yet on the roadmap.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>
>
>   

Re: [OpenSBC] Couple of questions

[Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...>]

inline...

Jonas Gauffin wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've been checking OpenSBC and got a couple of questions.
>
> I can provide my own configuration by implementing a XML-RPC server, 
> right?

Close but not quite.    OpenSBC allows you to design your own config 
pages by providing XML-RPC hooks so an external web interface maybe able 
to edit config info outside of OpenSBC Config Pages.  OpenSBC will still 
fetch information locally.

> But what if I just want to provide the routing information when it's 
> requested (when a new call arrives)?
>
> I want to do the same with UA authentication (REGISTER). I want to 
> lookup the
> account/password when the REGISTER transaction is received.
Work is currently in progress to introduce diameter support in OpenSBC.  
You could provide route and auth info to OpenSBC by implementing a 
diameter server.   We are expecting this feature to be included in 
version 1.1.6

>
> I want to monitor all calls on each UA (to always have the current 
> state of a UA (as in busy/free)). What is the best way to do that?
> How do I control calls that UA's have? (like put them on hold, 
> disconnect etc)

That feature is a switchboard feature and should be a functionality of a 
PBX and not an SBC.

>
>
> Last question is about IVR. How do I create different IVR 
> applications? I've tried to figure out how SBCIVRHandler is invoked, 
> but it's lot of code to dig in.
>

You have looked at the right place.  I believe the IVR handler is one of 
the easiest to understand among all the OSBC handlers.   There is 
currently work being done to have OpenSBC support VXML via openVXI.   
This should be out with 1.1.6 as well.


> Any help would be greatly appreciated,
>   Jonas
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.10/1160 - Release Date: 11/29/2007 8:32 PM
>   

Re: [OpenSBC] RFC 3398 SIP-T with encapsulate ISUP message

[ehernaez <ope...@op...>]

OSBC is not currently SIP-T compliant.   This is on our radar screen, but yet on the roadmap.

[OpenSBC] Couple of questions

[Jonas G. <jon...@gm...>]

Hello

I've been checking OpenSBC and got a couple of questions.

I can provide my own configuration by implementing a XML-RPC server, right?
But what if I just want to provide the routing information when it's
requested (when a new call arrives)?

I want to do the same with UA authentication (REGISTER). I want to lookup
the
account/password when the REGISTER transaction is received.

I want to monitor all calls on each UA (to always have the current state of
a UA (as in busy/free)). What is the best way to do that?
How do I control calls that UA's have? (like put them on hold, disconnect
etc)

Last question is about IVR. How do I create different IVR applications? I've
tried to figure out how SBCIVRHandler is invoked, but it's lot of code to
dig in.

Any help would be greatly appreciated,
  Jonas

Re: [OpenSBC] Trunking/ DID - To URI

[Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...>]

Based on the logs, you are still using a version that did not let the 
request-uri pass through.  Recent changes has ammended this behavior and 
B2BUA routes now honor not only the To-URI to be routes but the 
request-URI as well.  Please upgrade using CVS head.

Dinesh Dialani wrote:
> Hi Joegen,
>
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 7:35 AM, Joegen E. Baclor <joe...@gm... 
> <mailto:joe...@gm...>> wrote:
>
>     Gaurav,
>
>     Have you already tried manually specifying a route in B2BUA Routes?
>
>     [sip:206...@si...
>     <mailto:sip:206...@si...>]
>     sip:your_internal_ua@internal_domain
>
>  
> I put
>
> [sip:206...@si... 
> <mailto:sip:206...@si...>] sip:102@192.168.96.123 
> <mailto:sip:102@192.168.96.123>
>
> in B2BUA Routes but it does not work and sends a 404 Not Found sip 
> packet.
>
>
>
>
>
>     If this did not work, please send me your b2bua logs off list
>
>
> I am attaching b2bua logs here with.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Dinesh
>  
>
>
>
>     Joegen
>
>     Gaurav Kheterpal wrote:
>     > Hi Joegen,
>     >
>     > Thanks for your reply. The request URI in INVITE is
>     > sip:206...@si...
>     <mailto:sip:206...@si...>.
>     >
>     > Any suggestions?
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     > Gaurav
>     >
>     >
>     >> -----Original Message-----
>     >> From: ope...@li...
>     <mailto:ope...@li...>
>     >> [mailto:ope...@li...
>     <mailto:ope...@li...>] On
>     Behalf Of
>     >> Joegen E. Baclor
>     >> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 2:37 PM
>     >> To: ope...@li...
>     <mailto:ope...@li...>
>     >> Cc: ope...@li...
>     <mailto:ope...@li...>
>     >> Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] Trunking/ DID - To URI
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> I fully understand the problem.   What's the request-URI?  Is it
>     >> ***sip:555...@si...
>     <mailto:sip:555...@si...>
>     >> To=sip:555...@si...
>     <mailto:sip:555...@si...>.
>     >> com>*
>     >> like the invite below?
>     >>
>     >> INVITE ***sip:555...@si...
>     <mailto:sip:555...@si...>
>     >> To=sip:555...@si...
>     <mailto:sip:555...@si...>.
>     >> com>*
>     >> SIP/2.0
>     >> To: sip:12069220355*@sip3.voipvoip.com
>     <mailto:sip:12069220355*@sip3.voipvoip.com>
>     >>
>     >> Joegen
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> Gaurav Kheterpal wrote:
>     >>
>     >>> Hi Joegen,
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> I trust you are doing fine. While continuing to explore the
>     trunking
>     >>> feature of OpenSBC with various SIP providers, we ran in to the
>     >>> following issue:-
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> While testing with voipviop.com <http://voipviop.com>, The AOR
>     of our account in
>     >>> voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> <http://voipvoip.com> is
>     >>>
>     >>> * sip:555...@si...
>     <mailto:sip:555...@si...>
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>
>     <http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:555...@si...
>     <http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:555...@si...>.
>     >> com>
>     >>
>     >>> *and voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> <http://voipvoip.com>
>     proxy registers OpenSBC with
>     >>> above SIP URI. But voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com>
>     <http://voipvoip.com> has allocated
>     >>> DID 12069220355 for this particular AOR and all the incoming
>     calls
>     >>> coming to OpenSBC have SIP TO URI as
>     >>>
>     >>> To:  <sip:206...@si...
>     <mailto:sip:206...@si...>
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >> <
>     http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:206...@si....
>     >> com>>.
>     >>
>     >>> Now the problem is that when an inbound call comes in, the code
>     >>> searches for UserName: 2069220355 and tries to get SipTrunkAccount
>     >>> object but it fails as UserName is 5553885283 on Sip Trunk
>     Config Page.
>     >>>
>     >>> Here is snippet from the code.
>     >>>
>     >>> SBCRoutingHandler::B2BRouteCall()
>     >>>
>     >>>             {
>     >>>               SBCSIPTrunkAccount account;
>     >>>               account.SetUserName(
>     to.GetURI().GetUser().c_str() );
>     >>>               if( trunkReg->FindTrunkAccount( account ) )
>     >>>               {
>     >>>                 ///ok we have an account
>     >>>                 uri = SIPURI( account.GetInboundRoute() );
>     >>>               }
>     >>>            }
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> Any suggestions on how we can get the DID into account for
>     trunking?
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> As always, thanks in advance for your reply.
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>> Regards,
>     >>> Gaurav
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >>>
>     >> -
>     >>
>     >>> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business
>     White Paper
>     >>> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
>     >>> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
>     >>> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
>     >>>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     >>>
>     >>> _______________________________________________
>     >>> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
>     >>> Ope...@li...
>     <mailto:Ope...@li...>
>     >>>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     >>>
>     >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>     >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>     >>> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.9/1155 - Release Date:
>     >>>
>     >> 11/27/2007 8:30 PM
>     >>
>     >>
>     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business
>     White Paper
>     >> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
>     >> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
>     >> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
>     >> Ope...@li...
>     <mailto:Ope...@li...>
>     >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>     >>
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>
>     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White
>     Paper
>     from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
>     mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
>     http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
>     <http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
>     Ope...@li...
>     <mailto:Ope...@li...>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.10/1160 - Release Date: 11/29/2007 8:32 PM

Re: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC linker error LNK2019

[Frank D. <fra...@gm...>]

Hi Antonio,


 I have been experiencing similar problems. OpenSBC consistently crashes VC++ 2005 Expres when trying to build it, even though the sources compile without a problem. I have build opensipstack separately and this works fine, but I had to reconfigure things to make this succeed. I used the configure.exe tool (in the opensipstack directory) to disable IPv^6 and to exclude some of my directories from being searched for whatever the configuration tool searches for when activated from the IDE or from the commandline without any parameters. 


I.e. I opened a command prompt in the opensipstack directory and ran configure as follows: "configure --disable-ipv6" 


Maybe this will do the trick for you. If not, try disabling some of the features that you don't need and/or try excluding directories ("--exclude-dir=..." ) that don't seem to be needed.


Cheers,


 Frank


 


 

Re: [OpenSBC] Trunking/ DID - To URI

[Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...>]

Gaurav,

Have you already tried manually specifying a route in B2BUA Routes?

[sip:206...@si...] sip:your_internal_ua@internal_domain

If this did not work, please send me your b2bua logs off list

Joegen

Gaurav Kheterpal wrote:
> Hi Joegen,
>
> Thanks for your reply. The request URI in INVITE is
> sip:206...@si....
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Regards,
> Gaurav
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ope...@li...
>> [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of
>> Joegen E. Baclor
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 2:37 PM
>> To: ope...@li...
>> Cc: ope...@li...
>> Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] Trunking/ DID - To URI
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I fully understand the problem.   What's the request-URI?  Is it
>> ***sip:555...@si...
>> To=sip:555...@si....
>> com>*
>> like the invite below?
>>
>> INVITE ***sip:555...@si...
>> To=sip:555...@si....
>> com>*
>> SIP/2.0
>> To: sip:12069220355*@sip3.voipvoip.com
>>
>> Joegen
>>
>>
>>
>> Gaurav Kheterpal wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi Joegen,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I trust you are doing fine. While continuing to explore the trunking
>>> feature of OpenSBC with various SIP providers, we ran in to the
>>> following issue:-
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> While testing with voipviop.com, The AOR of our account in
>>> voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> is
>>>
>>> *sip:555...@si...
>>>
>>>       
>> <http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:555...@si....
>> com>
>>     
>>> *and voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> proxy registers OpenSBC with
>>> above SIP URI. But voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> has allocated
>>> DID 12069220355 for this particular AOR and all the incoming calls
>>> coming to OpenSBC have SIP TO URI as
>>>
>>> To:  <sip:206...@si...
>>>
>>>       
>> <http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:206...@si....
>> com>>.
>>     
>>> Now the problem is that when an inbound call comes in, the code
>>> searches for UserName: 2069220355 and tries to get SipTrunkAccount
>>> object but it fails as UserName is 5553885283 on Sip Trunk Config Page.
>>>
>>> Here is snippet from the code.
>>>
>>> SBCRoutingHandler::B2BRouteCall()
>>>
>>>             {
>>>               SBCSIPTrunkAccount account;
>>>               account.SetUserName( to.GetURI().GetUser().c_str() );
>>>               if( trunkReg->FindTrunkAccount( account ) )
>>>               {
>>>                 ///ok we have an account
>>>                 uri = SIPURI( account.GetInboundRoute() );
>>>               }
>>>            }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any suggestions on how we can get the DID into account for trunking?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As always, thanks in advance for your reply.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gaurav
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>       
>> -
>>     
>>> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
>>> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
>>> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
>>> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
>>> Ope...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.9/1155 - Release Date:
>>>       
>> 11/27/2007 8:30 PM
>>     
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
>> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
>> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
>> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
>> Ope...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>>     
>
>
>
>   

Re: [OpenSBC] Trunking/ DID - To URI

[Gaurav K. <gkh...@is...>]

Hi Joegen,

Thanks for your reply. The request URI in INVITE is
sip:206...@si....

Any suggestions?

Regards,
Gaurav

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ope...@li...
> [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of
> Joegen E. Baclor
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 2:37 PM
> To: ope...@li...
> Cc: ope...@li...
> Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] Trunking/ DID - To URI
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I fully understand the problem.   What's the request-URI?  Is it
> ***sip:555...@si...
> To=sip:555...@si....
> com>*
> like the invite below?
> 
> INVITE ***sip:555...@si...
> To=sip:555...@si....
> com>*
> SIP/2.0
> To: sip:12069220355*@sip3.voipvoip.com
> 
> Joegen
> 
> 
> 
> Gaurav Kheterpal wrote:
> >
> > Hi Joegen,
> >
> >
> >
> > I trust you are doing fine. While continuing to explore the trunking
> > feature of OpenSBC with various SIP providers, we ran in to the
> > following issue:-
> >
> >
> >
> > While testing with voipviop.com, The AOR of our account in
> > voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> is
> >
> > *sip:555...@si...
> >
> <http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:555...@si....
> com>
> >
> > *and voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> proxy registers OpenSBC with
> > above SIP URI. But voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> has allocated
> > DID 12069220355 for this particular AOR and all the incoming calls
> > coming to OpenSBC have SIP TO URI as
> >
> > To:  <sip:206...@si...
> >
> <http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:206...@si....
> com>>.
> >
> > Now the problem is that when an inbound call comes in, the code
> > searches for UserName: 2069220355 and tries to get SipTrunkAccount
> > object but it fails as UserName is 5553885283 on Sip Trunk Config Page.
> >
> > Here is snippet from the code.
> >
> > SBCRoutingHandler::B2BRouteCall()
> >
> >             {
> >               SBCSIPTrunkAccount account;
> >               account.SetUserName( to.GetURI().GetUser().c_str() );
> >               if( trunkReg->FindTrunkAccount( account ) )
> >               {
> >                 ///ok we have an account
> >                 uri = SIPURI( account.GetInboundRoute() );
> >               }
> >            }
> >
> >
> >
> > Any suggestions on how we can get the DID into account for trunking?
> >
> >
> >
> > As always, thanks in advance for your reply.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gaurav
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> > from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> > mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> > http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> > Ope...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.9/1155 - Release Date:
> 11/27/2007 8:30 PM
> >
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel

Re: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC Performance and Scalability

[Chandra S. A. <cag...@ve...>]

Gaurav,

 

Do u work for Solegy? If yes, I would like to know how many instances of
OpenSBC are running to achieve the scenario described in
http://www.opensourcesip.org:8080/clearspacex/docs/DOC-1011 ?

 

Thanks a ton,

CS

 

 

 

 

  _____  

From: ope...@li...
[mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of
Gaurav Kheterpal
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 5:17 PM
To: ope...@li...
Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC Performance and Scalability

 

I'm not sure whether a formal document exists for the same or not but as an
avid user, I've followed this list closely. Eric replied with the following
to a similar request on this mailing list some time back:-

 

"OpenSBC is being used in stable production environments by several service
providers that we know of.  At Solegy alone, OpenSBC handles transactions
for hundreds of thousands of end users and processes millions of call
attempts daily.  The capacity of a single instance will vary depending on
your usage scenario, however you can expect an instance running on an
avaerage server (in B2BUA mode with media proxy enabled) to handle several
hundred concurrent calls and many thousands of registered users.  Higher
capacities may be achieved by using load-balancing techniques.

 

 

If you are interested in a commercial support arrangement from the people
that created OpenSBC, Solegy offers several options check here:   

 

 

http://www.opensourcesip.org:8080/clearspacex/docs/DOC-1000

 

I hope that helps.

 

Regards,
Gaurav

 

  _____  

From: ope...@li...
[mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of
Chandra Shekhar Agrawal
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 5:01 PM
To: ope...@li...
Subject: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC Performance and Scalability

 

Guys

 

IS there ant performance matrix or scalability document available for
OpenSBC. I tried searching on net but was hardy able to find anything
substantial.

 

Your help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

CS

 

Re: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC Performance and Scalability

[Chandra S. A. <cag...@ve...>]

Thanks Gaurav! It really helped!

 

Can I know little bit about Eric ?

Thanks

CS

 

 

  _____  

From: ope...@li...
[mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of
Gaurav Kheterpal
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 5:17 PM
To: ope...@li...
Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC Performance and Scalability

 

I'm not sure whether a formal document exists for the same or not but as an
avid user, I've followed this list closely. Eric replied with the following
to a similar request on this mailing list some time back:-

 

"OpenSBC is being used in stable production environments by several service
providers that we know of.  At Solegy alone, OpenSBC handles transactions
for hundreds of thousands of end users and processes millions of call
attempts daily.  The capacity of a single instance will vary depending on
your usage scenario, however you can expect an instance running on an
avaerage server (in B2BUA mode with media proxy enabled) to handle several
hundred concurrent calls and many thousands of registered users.  Higher
capacities may be achieved by using load-balancing techniques.

 

 

If you are interested in a commercial support arrangement from the people
that created OpenSBC, Solegy offers several options check here:   

 

 

http://www.opensourcesip.org:8080/clearspacex/docs/DOC-1000

 

I hope that helps.

 

Regards,
Gaurav

 

  _____  

From: ope...@li...
[mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of
Chandra Shekhar Agrawal
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 5:01 PM
To: ope...@li...
Subject: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC Performance and Scalability

 

Guys

 

IS there ant performance matrix or scalability document available for
OpenSBC. I tried searching on net but was hardy able to find anything
substantial.

 

Your help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

CS

 

Re: [OpenSBC] Trunking/ DID - To URI

[Dinesh D. <din...@gm...>]

Hi Joegen,



On Nov 28, 2007 2:37 PM, Joegen E. Baclor <joe...@gm...> wrote:

>
>
>
> I fully understand the problem.   What's the request-URI?  Is it
> ***sip:555...@si...
> <
> http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:555...@si...
> >*
> like the invite below?


Request-URI while Registration is

To: sip:555...@si...

INVITE ***sip:555...@si...
> <
> http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:555...@si...
> >*
> SIP/2.0
> To: sip:12069220355*@sip3.voipvoip.com


And when an Inbound call comes in, the Request-URI is

To: sip:206...@si...


<sip:12069220355*@sip3.voipvoip.com>
> <
> http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:555...@si...
> >*
>
> Joegen


Thanks

Dinesh

>
>
>
>
> Gaurav Kheterpal wrote:
> >
> > Hi Joegen,
> >
> >
> >
> > I trust you are doing fine. While continuing to explore the trunking
> > feature of OpenSBC with various SIP providers, we ran in to the
> > following issue:-
> >
> >
> >
> > While testing with voipviop.com, The AOR of our account in
> > voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> is
> >
> > *sip:555...@si...
> > <
> http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:555...@si...
> >
> >
> > *and voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> proxy registers OpenSBC with
> > above SIP URI. But voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> has allocated
> > DID 12069220355 for this particular AOR and all the incoming calls
> > coming to OpenSBC have SIP TO URI as
> >
> > To:  <sip:206...@si...
> > <
> http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:206...@si...
> >>.
> >
> > Now the problem is that when an inbound call comes in, the code
> > searches for UserName: 2069220355 and tries to get SipTrunkAccount
> > object but it fails as UserName is 5553885283 on Sip Trunk Config Page.
> >
> > Here is snippet from the code.
> >
> > SBCRoutingHandler::B2BRouteCall()
> >
> >             {
> >               SBCSIPTrunkAccount account;
> >               account.SetUserName( to.GetURI().GetUser().c_str() );
> >               if( trunkReg->FindTrunkAccount( account ) )
> >               {
> >                 ///ok we have an account
> >                 uri = SIPURI( account.GetInboundRoute() );
> >               }
> >            }
> >
> >
> >
> > Any suggestions on how we can get the DID into account for trunking?
> >
> >
> >
> > As always, thanks in advance for your reply.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gaurav
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> > from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> > mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> > http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> > Ope...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.9/1155 - Release Date:
> 11/27/2007 8:30 PM
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>

Re: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC Performance and Scalability

[Gaurav K. <gkh...@is...>]

I'm not sure whether a formal document exists for the same or not but as an
avid user, I've followed this list closely. Eric replied with the following
to a similar request on this mailing list some time back:-

 

"OpenSBC is being used in stable production environments by several service
providers that we know of.  At Solegy alone, OpenSBC handles transactions
for hundreds of thousands of end users and processes millions of call
attempts daily.  The capacity of a single instance will vary depending on
your usage scenario, however you can expect an instance running on an
avaerage server (in B2BUA mode with media proxy enabled) to handle several
hundred concurrent calls and many thousands of registered users.  Higher
capacities may be achieved by using load-balancing techniques.

 

 

If you are interested in a commercial support arrangement from the people
that created OpenSBC, Solegy offers several options check here:   

 

 

http://www.opensourcesip.org:8080/clearspacex/docs/DOC-1000

 

I hope that helps.

 

Regards,
Gaurav

 

  _____  

From: ope...@li...
[mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of
Chandra Shekhar Agrawal
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 5:01 PM
To: ope...@li...
Subject: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC Performance and Scalability

 

Guys

 

IS there ant performance matrix or scalability document available for
OpenSBC. I tried searching on net but was hardy able to find anything
substantial.

 

Your help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

CS

 

[OpenSBC] OpenSBC Performance and Scalability

[Chandra S. A. <cag...@ve...>]

Guys

 

IS there ant performance matrix or scalability document available for
OpenSBC. I tried searching on net but was hardy able to find anything
substantial.

 

Your help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

CS

 

Re: [OpenSBC] Trunking/ DID - To URI

[Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...>]

I fully understand the problem.   What's the request-URI?  Is it 
***sip:555...@si... 
<http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:555...@si...>*  
like the invite below?

INVITE ***sip:555...@si... 
<http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:555...@si...>* 
SIP/2.0
To: sip:12069220355*@sip3.voipvoip.com 
<http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:555...@si...>*

Joegen



Gaurav Kheterpal wrote:
>
> Hi Joegen,
>
>  
>
> I trust you are doing fine. While continuing to explore the trunking 
> feature of OpenSBC with various SIP providers, we ran in to the 
> following issue:-
>
>  
>
> While testing with voipviop.com, The AOR of our account in 
> voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> is
>
> *sip:555...@si... 
> <http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:555...@si...>
>
> *and voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> proxy registers OpenSBC with 
> above SIP URI. But voipvoip.com <http://voipvoip.com> has allocated 
> DID 12069220355 for this particular AOR and all the incoming calls 
> coming to OpenSBC have SIP TO URI as
>
> To:  <sip:206...@si... 
> <http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:206...@si...>>.
>
> Now the problem is that when an inbound call comes in, the code 
> searches for UserName: 2069220355 and tries to get SipTrunkAccount 
> object but it fails as UserName is 5553885283 on Sip Trunk Config Page.
>
> Here is snippet from the code.
>
> SBCRoutingHandler::B2BRouteCall()
>
>             {
>               SBCSIPTrunkAccount account;
>               account.SetUserName( to.GetURI().GetUser().c_str() );
>               if( trunkReg->FindTrunkAccount( account ) )
>               {
>                 ///ok we have an account
>                 uri = SIPURI( account.GetInboundRoute() );
>               }
>            }
>
>  
>
> Any suggestions on how we can get the DID into account for trunking?
>
>  
>
> As always, thanks in advance for your reply.
>
>  
>
> Regards,
> Gaurav
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.9/1155 - Release Date: 11/27/2007 8:30 PM
>   

[OpenSBC] Trunking/ DID - To URI

[Gaurav K. <gkh...@is...>]

Hi Joegen,

 

I trust you are doing fine. While continuing to explore the trunking feature
of OpenSBC with various SIP providers, we ran in to the following issue:-

 

While testing with voipviop.com, The AOR of our account in
<http://voipvoip.com> voipvoip.com is 

 
<http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:555...@si...
m> sip:555...@si...

and  <http://voipvoip.com> voipvoip.com proxy registers OpenSBC with above
SIP URI. But  <http://voipvoip.com> voipvoip.com has allocated DID
12069220355 for this particular AOR and all the incoming calls coming to
OpenSBC have SIP TO URI as 

To:  <
<http://us.f524.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=sip:206...@si...
m> sip:206...@si... >.

Now the problem is that when an inbound call comes in, the code searches for
UserName: 2069220355 and tries to get SipTrunkAccount object but it fails as
UserName is 5553885283 on Sip Trunk Config Page. 

Here is snippet from the code. 

SBCRoutingHandler::B2BRouteCall()

            {
              SBCSIPTrunkAccount account;
              account.SetUserName( to.GetURI().GetUser().c_str() );
              if( trunkReg->FindTrunkAccount( account ) ) 
              {
                ///ok we have an account
                uri = SIPURI( account.GetInboundRoute() );
              }
           }

 

Any suggestions on how we can get the DID into account for trunking?

 

As always, thanks in advance for your reply.

 

Regards,
Gaurav

Re: [OpenSBC] re-invite message opensbc

[Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...>]

The only time OpenSBC will send a reInvite would be during 3PCC Call 
Transfer (Local REFER).  This is to make sure that the call being 
transfered is notified of the new codec (If remote chooses to pick a 
different one from the set).   If you are not referring to 3PCC Call 
Transfer, the the reINVITE you see came from the endpoints.   OpenSBC 
just relays the SDP in this case.

HTH.

Joegen

Asim wrote:
> its changing the codec and RTP port number.
>
>   

Re: [OpenSBC] re-invite message opensbc

[Asim <ar...@ma...>]

its changing the codec and RTP port number.