Thread: [OpenSIPStack] SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
Menu
▾
▴
opensipstack-devel
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@it...> - 2008-02-18 14:32:20
|
Hi. I'm currently working on a (commercial) project in which we will use OpenSipStacks SIP and SDP Parser (maybe other parts later). I'm using just the SIPMessage class to parse the SIP Messages themselves and SDPLazyParser to parse the SDP if there is one. 1) Did I find the correct classes for my use or would other classes be better suited / recommended? (I need to be able to read and/or change every part of both the sip headers and the sdp) 2) Is there functionality (that is not linked with the transport) that would allow me to automagically generate say a TRYING,RINGING, OK from an incoming request? Regards Mit freundlichen Grüßen Thomas Raschbacher ____________________________________________ itCampus Technology GmbH Österreich * Deutschland * Italien Dresdner Straße 45 /DG 1200 Wien tho...@it... Tel: +43 (1) 890 22 82 - 58 Fax: +43 (1) 890 22 82 - 958 http://www.itctec.com UID: ATU 6339 0618 Firmenbuchnr: FN292598t, Handelsgericht Wien Geschäftsführer: Andreas Günser, Andreas Lassmann Joint Venture von itCampus und MEC itCampus Gruppe Deutschland * Großbritannien * Italien * Österreich * Schweiz * Slowakei http://www.itcampus.eu |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-02-18 15:43:34
|
Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > Hi. > > I'm currently working on a (commercial) project in which we will use OpenSipStacks SIP and SDP Parser (maybe other parts later). > I'm using just the SIPMessage class to parse the SIP Messages themselves and SDPLazyParser to parse the SDP if there is one. > > 1) Did I find the correct classes for my use or would other classes be better suited / recommended? (I need to be able to read and/or change every part of both the sip headers and the sdp) > Those are the two classes you need, yes. > 2) Is there functionality (that is not linked with the transport) that would allow me to automagically generate say a TRYING,RINGING, OK from an incoming request? > see SIPMessage::CreateResponse(); > Regards > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > Thomas Raschbacher > ____________________________________________ > itCampus Technology GmbH > Österreich * Deutschland * Italien > Dresdner Straße 45 /DG > 1200 Wien > tho...@it... > Tel: +43 (1) 890 22 82 - 58 > Fax: +43 (1) 890 22 82 - 958 > http://www.itctec.com > UID: ATU 6339 0618 > Firmenbuchnr: FN292598t, Handelsgericht Wien > Geschäftsführer: Andreas Günser, Andreas Lassmann > Joint Venture von itCampus und MEC > > itCampus Gruppe > Deutschland * Großbritannien * Italien * Österreich * Schweiz * Slowakei > http://www.itcampus.eu > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@it...> - 2008-02-19 11:32:07
|
Thanks for your fast reply. I just did some testing with (the 1.1.7 release of OSS) with test messages from http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/testmsg.html It all seems fine apart from test1.txt which the sip parser reports as not being a valid sip message. According to the page (I'm not sure myself as it is rather messed up ;)) this is a valid SIP message [although imho if someone actually writes a client that sends a message like this that person should be hang upside down for a week until he/she comes to his/her senses again ;))] It seems to think the call id is not valid (SIPMessage.cxx line 8528) (I debugged a bit and it seems that m_RawMessage is NULL -wherever that gets set .. I assume at parse time or something .. anyway what would be the best way to find out which part of that message it doesn't like? Regards, -----Original Message----- From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor Sent: Montag, 18. Februar 2008 16:43 To: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > Hi. > > I'm currently working on a (commercial) project in which we will use OpenSipStacks SIP and SDP Parser (maybe other parts later). > I'm using just the SIPMessage class to parse the SIP Messages themselves and SDPLazyParser to parse the SDP if there is one. > > 1) Did I find the correct classes for my use or would other classes be better suited / recommended? (I need to be able to read and/or change every part of both the sip headers and the sdp) > Those are the two classes you need, yes. > 2) Is there functionality (that is not linked with the transport) that would allow me to automagically generate say a TRYING,RINGING, OK from an incoming request? > see SIPMessage::CreateResponse(); > Regards > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > Thomas Raschbacher > ____________________________________________ > itCampus Technology GmbH > Österreich * Deutschland * Italien > Dresdner Straße 45 /DG > 1200 Wien > tho...@it... > Tel: +43 (1) 890 22 82 - 58 > Fax: +43 (1) 890 22 82 - 958 > http://www.itctec.com > UID: ATU 6339 0618 > Firmenbuchnr: FN292598t, Handelsgericht Wien > Geschäftsführer: Andreas Günser, Andreas Lassmann > Joint Venture von itCampus und MEC > > itCampus Gruppe > Deutschland * Großbritannien * Italien * Österreich * Schweiz * Slowakei > http://www.itcampus.eu > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-02-19 11:39:41
|
Hi Thomas, I am currently in the process of writing a new SIP Parser for OpenSIPStack that makes use of a recursive descent ABNF parser for SIP Messages. This would allow implementors to detect syntax error in SIP Requests and be able to tell exactly where the error occurred in the parsing process. If you could wait a couple of weeks, this new parser might be best suited for your needs. As of the moment, the current OpenSIPStack is a passive parser so you would need to manually check each header for validity. Joegen Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > Thanks for your fast reply. > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > I just did some testing with (the 1.1.7 release of OSS) with test messages = > from > http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/testmsg.html > It all seems fine apart from test1.txt which the sip parser reports as not = > being a valid sip message. According to the page (I'm not sure myself as it= > is rather messed up ;)) this is a valid SIP message [although imho if some= > one actually writes a client that sends a message like this that person sho= > uld be hang upside down for a week until he/she comes to his/her senses aga= > in ;))] > It seems to think the call id is not valid (SIPMessage.cxx line 8528) (I de= > bugged a bit and it seems that m_RawMessage is NULL -wherever that gets set= > .. I assume at parse time or something .. anyway what would be the best wa= > y to find out which part of that message it doesn't like? > > Regards, > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... [mailto:opensipstack= > -de...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor > Sent: Montag, 18. Februar 2008 16:43 > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser > > Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I'm currently working on a (commercial) project in which we will use Open= >> > SipStacks SIP and SDP Parser (maybe other parts later). > >> I'm using just the SIPMessage class to parse the SIP Messages themselves = >> > and SDPLazyParser to parse the SDP if there is one. > >> 1) Did I find the correct classes for my use or would other classes be be= >> > tter suited / recommended? (I need to be able to read and/or change every p= > art of both the sip headers and the sdp) > > > Those are the two classes you need, yes. > > > >> 2) Is there functionality (that is not linked with the transport) that wo= >> > uld allow me to automagically generate say a TRYING,RINGING, OK from an inc= > oming request? > > > see SIPMessage::CreateResponse(); > > >> Regards >> >> Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen >> Thomas Raschbacher >> ____________________________________________ >> itCampus Technology GmbH >> =D6sterreich * Deutschland * Italien >> Dresdner Stra=DFe 45 /DG >> 1200 Wien >> tho...@it... >> Tel: +43 (1) 890 22 82 - 58 >> Fax: +43 (1) 890 22 82 - 958 >> http://www.itctec.com >> UID: ATU 6339 0618 >> Firmenbuchnr: FN292598t, Handelsgericht Wien >> Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Andreas G=FCnser, Andreas Lassmann >> Joint Venture von itCampus und MEC >> >> itCampus Gruppe >> Deutschland * Gro=DFbritannien * Italien * =D6sterreich * Schweiz * Slowa= >> > kei > >> http://www.itcampus.eu >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@it...> - 2008-02-19 11:45:34
|
Hi. I'm afraid that a few weeks might be too long for me/our project. It's funny though that you mention a descent ABNF parser as I've been looking into one myself (boost::spirit http://www.boost.org/libs/spirit/index.html) Is any code for this available somewhere already as I'd like to have a look if possible. Regards, -----Original Message----- From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 12:40 To: Thomas Raschbacher Cc: ope...@li... Subject: Re: Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: [OpenSIPStack] SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) Hi Thomas, I am currently in the process of writing a new SIP Parser for OpenSIPStack that makes use of a recursive descent ABNF parser for SIP Messages. This would allow implementors to detect syntax error in SIP Requests and be able to tell exactly where the error occurred in the parsing process. If you could wait a couple of weeks, this new parser might be best suited for your needs. As of the moment, the current OpenSIPStack is a passive parser so you would need to manually check each header for validity. Joegen Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > Thanks for your fast reply. > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > I just did some testing with (the 1.1.7 release of OSS) with test messages = > from > http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/testmsg.html > It all seems fine apart from test1.txt which the sip parser reports as not = > being a valid sip message. According to the page (I'm not sure myself as it= > is rather messed up ;)) this is a valid SIP message [although imho if some= > one actually writes a client that sends a message like this that person sho= > uld be hang upside down for a week until he/she comes to his/her senses aga= > in ;))] > It seems to think the call id is not valid (SIPMessage.cxx line 8528) (I de= > bugged a bit and it seems that m_RawMessage is NULL -wherever that gets set= > .. I assume at parse time or something .. anyway what would be the best wa= > y to find out which part of that message it doesn't like? > > Regards, > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... [mailto:opensipstack= > -de...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor > Sent: Montag, 18. Februar 2008 16:43 > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser > > Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I'm currently working on a (commercial) project in which we will use Open= >> > SipStacks SIP and SDP Parser (maybe other parts later). > >> I'm using just the SIPMessage class to parse the SIP Messages themselves = >> > and SDPLazyParser to parse the SDP if there is one. > >> 1) Did I find the correct classes for my use or would other classes be be= >> > tter suited / recommended? (I need to be able to read and/or change every p= > art of both the sip headers and the sdp) > > > Those are the two classes you need, yes. > > > >> 2) Is there functionality (that is not linked with the transport) that wo= >> > uld allow me to automagically generate say a TRYING,RINGING, OK from an inc= > oming request? > > > see SIPMessage::CreateResponse(); > > >> Regards >> >> Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen >> Thomas Raschbacher >> ____________________________________________ >> itCampus Technology GmbH >> =D6sterreich * Deutschland * Italien >> Dresdner Stra=DFe 45 /DG >> 1200 Wien >> tho...@it... >> Tel: +43 (1) 890 22 82 - 58 >> Fax: +43 (1) 890 22 82 - 958 >> http://www.itctec.com >> UID: ATU 6339 0618 >> Firmenbuchnr: FN292598t, Handelsgericht Wien >> Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Andreas G=FCnser, Andreas Lassmann >> Joint Venture von itCampus und MEC >> >> itCampus Gruppe >> Deutschland * Gro=DFbritannien * Italien * =D6sterreich * Schweiz * Slowa= >> > kei > >> http://www.itcampus.eu >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-02-19 11:49:48
|
Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > Hi. > > I'm afraid that a few weeks might be too long for me/our project. > It's funny though that you mention a descent ABNF parser as I've been looking into one myself (boost::spirit http://www.boost.org/libs/spirit/index.html) > AFAIK boost::spirits is an EBNF parser and not ABNF. However, I'm sure it can be stretched to do SIP Parsing. > Is any code for this available somewhere already as I'd like to have a look if possible. > sure... here it is http://opensipstack.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opensipstack/include/utils/ABNF.h?view=markup > Regards, > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] > Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 12:40 > To: Thomas Raschbacher > Cc: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: [OpenSIPStack] SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) > > Hi Thomas, > > I am currently in the process of writing a new SIP Parser for > OpenSIPStack that makes use of a recursive descent ABNF parser for SIP > Messages. This would allow implementors to detect syntax error in SIP > Requests and be able to tell exactly where the error occurred in the > parsing process. If you could wait a couple of weeks, this new parser > might be best suited for your needs. > > As of the moment, the current OpenSIPStack is a passive parser so you > would need to manually check each header for validity. > > Joegen > > Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > >> Thanks for your fast reply. >> Mime-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 >> >> I just did some testing with (the 1.1.7 release of OSS) with test messages = >> from >> http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/testmsg.html >> It all seems fine apart from test1.txt which the sip parser reports as not = >> being a valid sip message. According to the page (I'm not sure myself as it= >> is rather messed up ;)) this is a valid SIP message [although imho if some= >> one actually writes a client that sends a message like this that person sho= >> uld be hang upside down for a week until he/she comes to his/her senses aga= >> in ;))] >> It seems to think the call id is not valid (SIPMessage.cxx line 8528) (I de= >> bugged a bit and it seems that m_RawMessage is NULL -wherever that gets set= >> .. I assume at parse time or something .. anyway what would be the best wa= >> y to find out which part of that message it doesn't like? >> >> Regards, >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ope...@li... [mailto:opensipstack= >> -de...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor >> Sent: Montag, 18. Februar 2008 16:43 >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser >> >> Thomas Raschbacher wrote: >> >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> I'm currently working on a (commercial) project in which we will use Open= >>> >>> >> SipStacks SIP and SDP Parser (maybe other parts later). >> >> >>> I'm using just the SIPMessage class to parse the SIP Messages themselves = >>> >>> >> and SDPLazyParser to parse the SDP if there is one. >> >> >>> 1) Did I find the correct classes for my use or would other classes be be= >>> >>> >> tter suited / recommended? (I need to be able to read and/or change every p= >> art of both the sip headers and the sdp) >> >> >> Those are the two classes you need, yes. >> >> >> >> >>> 2) Is there functionality (that is not linked with the transport) that wo= >>> >>> >> uld allow me to automagically generate say a TRYING,RINGING, OK from an inc= >> oming request? >> >> >> see SIPMessage::CreateResponse(); >> >> >> >>> Regards >>> >>> Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen >>> Thomas Raschbacher >>> ____________________________________________ >>> itCampus Technology GmbH >>> =D6sterreich * Deutschland * Italien >>> Dresdner Stra=DFe 45 /DG >>> 1200 Wien >>> tho...@it... >>> Tel: +43 (1) 890 22 82 - 58 >>> Fax: +43 (1) 890 22 82 - 958 >>> http://www.itctec.com >>> UID: ATU 6339 0618 >>> Firmenbuchnr: FN292598t, Handelsgericht Wien >>> Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrer: Andreas G=FCnser, Andreas Lassmann >>> Joint Venture von itCampus und MEC >>> >>> itCampus Gruppe >>> Deutschland * Gro=DFbritannien * Italien * =D6sterreich * Schweiz * Slowa= >>> >>> >> kei >> >> >>> http://www.itcampus.eu >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > > |
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@it...> - 2008-02-19 12:03:41
|
Hi again You are of course right it is EBNF not ABNF I misread there ;) The thing is though that last time I tried to compile something with it that was more than just an example I got a 150kB error message :( Anyway the parser you are working on .. will it be able to deal with the previously mentioned test request (http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/test1.txt) ? (it's not vitally important that it can just curious about that one really) Apart from that will the new parser be api compatible (or at least easy to exchange) with the existing one? (also I'd need to be able to use it without the opensipstack transports ..) Regards -----Original Message----- From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 12:50 To: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) AFAIK boost::spirits is an EBNF parser and not ABNF. However, I'm sure it can be stretched to do SIP Parsing. > Is any code for this available somewhere already as I'd like to have a look if possible. > sure... here it is http://opensipstack.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opensipstack/include/utils/ABNF.h?view=markup ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-02-19 12:13:21
|
Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > Hi again > > You are of course right it is EBNF not ABNF I misread there ;) > The thing is though that last time I tried to compile something with it that was more than just an example I got a 150kB error message :( > > Anyway the parser you are working on .. will it be able to deal with the previously mentioned test request (http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/test1.txt) ? (it's not vitally important that it can just curious about that one really) > Yes. That's the whole idea of the ABNF parser. If ABNF allows it, then its a valid header. You will be surprised how screwed up messages can be yet can still be valid as far as ABNF is concerned. > Apart from that will the new parser be api compatible (or at least easy to exchange) with the existing one? (also I'd need to be able to use it without the opensipstack transports ..) > Backward compatibility is not a guarantee since the new stack will no longer be dependent to PWLIB which is a big architectural change. What I can promise is anyone already familiar with OpenSIPStack should not have a hard time migrating codes from version 1 to version 2 of the library. > Regards > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... > Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 12:50 > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) > > > AFAIK boost::spirits is an EBNF parser and not ABNF. However, I'm sure > it can be stretched to do SIP Parsing. > > >> Is any code for this available somewhere already as I'd like to have a look if possible. >> >> > > sure... here it is > > http://opensipstack.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opensipstack/include/utils/ABNF.h?view=markup > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@it...> - 2008-02-19 12:16:59
|
Interesting. I didn't know that there was such a big version change imminent .. is there a list of planned changes/features somewhere? Also what is going to be used instead of pwlib? Regards, -----Original Message----- From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:13 To: ope...@li... Cc: jo...@op... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > Hi again > > You are of course right it is EBNF not ABNF I misread there ;) > The thing is though that last time I tried to compile something with it that was more than just an example I got a 150kB error message :( > > Anyway the parser you are working on .. will it be able to deal with the previously mentioned test request (http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/test1.txt) ? (it's not vitally important that it can just curious about that one really) > Yes. That's the whole idea of the ABNF parser. If ABNF allows it, then its a valid header. You will be surprised how screwed up messages can be yet can still be valid as far as ABNF is concerned. > Apart from that will the new parser be api compatible (or at least easy to exchange) with the existing one? (also I'd need to be able to use it without the opensipstack transports ..) > Backward compatibility is not a guarantee since the new stack will no longer be dependent to PWLIB which is a big architectural change. What I can promise is anyone already familiar with OpenSIPStack should not have a hard time migrating codes from version 1 to version 2 of the library. > Regards > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... > Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 12:50 > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) > > > AFAIK boost::spirits is an EBNF parser and not ABNF. However, I'm sure > it can be stretched to do SIP Parsing. > > >> Is any code for this available somewhere already as I'd like to have a look if possible. >> >> > > sure... here it is > > http://opensipstack.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opensipstack/include/utils/ABNF.h?view=markup > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-02-19 12:29:52
|
Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > Interesting. > > I didn't know that there was such a big version change imminent .. is there a list of planned changes/features somewhere? > Ok, before I get people panicking. Vesion 1 of OpenSIPStack will still be actively maintained and improved and will remain as the official active branch of the project for a long time. Version 2 of the library aims to improve on various part of version 1's architecture which would be very hard to improve on without affecting stability of existing code. Slowly, all functionalities of version 1 will be ported to version 2 until such time finally arrives when v2 is as great as version 1. > Also what is going to be used instead of pwlib? > For opensipstack, it will be purely STL avoiding third party dependencies as much as possible. For applications BOOST and ASIO are one of the possibilities. > Regards, > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor > Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:13 > To: ope...@li... > Cc: jo...@op... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) > > Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > >> Hi again >> >> You are of course right it is EBNF not ABNF I misread there ;) >> The thing is though that last time I tried to compile something with it that was more than just an example I got a 150kB error message :( >> >> Anyway the parser you are working on .. will it be able to deal with the previously mentioned test request (http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/test1.txt) ? (it's not vitally important that it can just curious about that one really) >> >> > > > Yes. That's the whole idea of the ABNF parser. If ABNF allows it, > then its a valid header. You will be surprised how screwed up messages > can be yet can still be valid as far as ABNF is concerned. > > > >> Apart from that will the new parser be api compatible (or at least easy to exchange) with the existing one? (also I'd need to be able to use it without the opensipstack transports ..) >> >> > > Backward compatibility is not a guarantee since the new stack will no > longer be dependent to PWLIB which is a big architectural change. What > I can promise is anyone already familiar with OpenSIPStack should not > have a hard time migrating codes from version 1 to version 2 of the library. > > > >> Regards >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... >> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 12:50 >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >> >> >> AFAIK boost::spirits is an EBNF parser and not ABNF. However, I'm sure >> it can be stretched to do SIP Parsing. >> >> >> >>> Is any code for this available somewhere already as I'd like to have a look if possible. >>> >>> >>> >> sure... here it is >> >> http://opensipstack.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opensipstack/include/utils/ABNF.h?view=markup >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > > |
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@it...> - 2008-02-19 12:37:46
|
:) This is quite a funny coincidence as I just wrote my/our own (Sip) TransportManager (UDP, TCP, TLS) using boost and boost::asio hehe -----Original Message----- From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:30 To: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > Interesting. > > I didn't know that there was such a big version change imminent .. is there a list of planned changes/features somewhere? > Ok, before I get people panicking. Vesion 1 of OpenSIPStack will still be actively maintained and improved and will remain as the official active branch of the project for a long time. Version 2 of the library aims to improve on various part of version 1's architecture which would be very hard to improve on without affecting stability of existing code. Slowly, all functionalities of version 1 will be ported to version 2 until such time finally arrives when v2 is as great as version 1. > Also what is going to be used instead of pwlib? > For opensipstack, it will be purely STL avoiding third party dependencies as much as possible. For applications BOOST and ASIO are one of the possibilities. > Regards, > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor > Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:13 > To: ope...@li... > Cc: jo...@op... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) > > Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > >> Hi again >> >> You are of course right it is EBNF not ABNF I misread there ;) >> The thing is though that last time I tried to compile something with it that was more than just an example I got a 150kB error message :( >> >> Anyway the parser you are working on .. will it be able to deal with the previously mentioned test request (http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/test1.txt) ? (it's not vitally important that it can just curious about that one really) >> >> > > > Yes. That's the whole idea of the ABNF parser. If ABNF allows it, > then its a valid header. You will be surprised how screwed up messages > can be yet can still be valid as far as ABNF is concerned. > > > >> Apart from that will the new parser be api compatible (or at least easy to exchange) with the existing one? (also I'd need to be able to use it without the opensipstack transports ..) >> >> > > Backward compatibility is not a guarantee since the new stack will no > longer be dependent to PWLIB which is a big architectural change. What > I can promise is anyone already familiar with OpenSIPStack should not > have a hard time migrating codes from version 1 to version 2 of the library. > > > >> Regards >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... >> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 12:50 >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >> >> >> AFAIK boost::spirits is an EBNF parser and not ABNF. However, I'm sure >> it can be stretched to do SIP Parsing. >> >> >> >>> Is any code for this available somewhere already as I'd like to have a look if possible. >>> >>> >>> >> sure... here it is >> >> http://opensipstack.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opensipstack/include/utils/ABNF.h?view=markup >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2008-02-19 12:57:44
|
I guess all roads lead to TR3 ;-) Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > :) > This is quite a funny coincidence as I just wrote my/our own (Sip) TransportManager (UDP, TCP, TLS) using boost and boost::asio hehe > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... > Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:30 > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) > > Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > >> Interesting. >> >> I didn't know that there was such a big version change imminent .. is there a list of planned changes/features somewhere? >> >> > Ok, before I get people panicking. Vesion 1 of OpenSIPStack will still > be actively maintained and improved and will remain as the official > active branch of the project for a long time. Version 2 of the library > aims to improve on various part of version 1's architecture which would > be very hard to improve on without affecting stability of existing > code. Slowly, all functionalities of version 1 will be ported to > version 2 until such time finally arrives when v2 is as great as version 1. > > >> Also what is going to be used instead of pwlib? >> >> > > > For opensipstack, it will be purely STL avoiding third party > dependencies as much as possible. For applications BOOST and ASIO are > one of the possibilities. > > > >> Regards, >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor >> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:13 >> To: ope...@li... >> Cc: jo...@op... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >> >> Thomas Raschbacher wrote: >> >> >>> Hi again >>> >>> You are of course right it is EBNF not ABNF I misread there ;) >>> The thing is though that last time I tried to compile something with it that was more than just an example I got a 150kB error message :( >>> >>> Anyway the parser you are working on .. will it be able to deal with the previously mentioned test request (http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/test1.txt) ? (it's not vitally important that it can just curious about that one really) >>> >>> >>> >> Yes. That's the whole idea of the ABNF parser. If ABNF allows it, >> then its a valid header. You will be surprised how screwed up messages >> can be yet can still be valid as far as ABNF is concerned. >> >> >> >> >>> Apart from that will the new parser be api compatible (or at least easy to exchange) with the existing one? (also I'd need to be able to use it without the opensipstack transports ..) >>> >>> >>> >> Backward compatibility is not a guarantee since the new stack will no >> longer be dependent to PWLIB which is a big architectural change. What >> I can promise is anyone already familiar with OpenSIPStack should not >> have a hard time migrating codes from version 1 to version 2 of the library. >> >> >> >> >>> Regards >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... >>> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 12:50 >>> To: ope...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >>> >>> >>> AFAIK boost::spirits is an EBNF parser and not ABNF. However, I'm sure >>> it can be stretched to do SIP Parsing. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Is any code for this available somewhere already as I'd like to have a look if possible. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> sure... here it is >>> >>> http://opensipstack.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opensipstack/include/utils/ABNF.h?view=markup >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > > |
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@it...> - 2008-02-19 13:27:27
|
Just browsed through some of the files on ViewVC and was wondering just how 'usable'/testable is the new implementation at the moment? At all or are you still 'just' working on the ABNF grammer itself? Regards, -----Original Message----- From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:58 To: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) I guess all roads lead to TR3 ;-) Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > :) > This is quite a funny coincidence as I just wrote my/our own (Sip) TransportManager (UDP, TCP, TLS) using boost and boost::asio hehe > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... > Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:30 > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) > > Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > >> Interesting. >> >> I didn't know that there was such a big version change imminent .. is there a list of planned changes/features somewhere? >> >> > Ok, before I get people panicking. Vesion 1 of OpenSIPStack will still > be actively maintained and improved and will remain as the official > active branch of the project for a long time. Version 2 of the library > aims to improve on various part of version 1's architecture which would > be very hard to improve on without affecting stability of existing > code. Slowly, all functionalities of version 1 will be ported to > version 2 until such time finally arrives when v2 is as great as version 1. > > >> Also what is going to be used instead of pwlib? >> >> > > > For opensipstack, it will be purely STL avoiding third party > dependencies as much as possible. For applications BOOST and ASIO are > one of the possibilities. > > > >> Regards, >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor >> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:13 >> To: ope...@li... >> Cc: jo...@op... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >> >> Thomas Raschbacher wrote: >> >> >>> Hi again >>> >>> You are of course right it is EBNF not ABNF I misread there ;) >>> The thing is though that last time I tried to compile something with it that was more than just an example I got a 150kB error message :( >>> >>> Anyway the parser you are working on .. will it be able to deal with the previously mentioned test request (http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/test1.txt) ? (it's not vitally important that it can just curious about that one really) >>> >>> >>> >> Yes. That's the whole idea of the ABNF parser. If ABNF allows it, >> then its a valid header. You will be surprised how screwed up messages >> can be yet can still be valid as far as ABNF is concerned. >> >> >> >> >>> Apart from that will the new parser be api compatible (or at least easy to exchange) with the existing one? (also I'd need to be able to use it without the opensipstack transports ..) >>> >>> >>> >> Backward compatibility is not a guarantee since the new stack will no >> longer be dependent to PWLIB which is a big architectural change. What >> I can promise is anyone already familiar with OpenSIPStack should not >> have a hard time migrating codes from version 1 to version 2 of the library. >> >> >> >> >>> Regards >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... >>> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 12:50 >>> To: ope...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >>> >>> >>> AFAIK boost::spirits is an EBNF parser and not ABNF. However, I'm sure >>> it can be stretched to do SIP Parsing. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Is any code for this available somewhere already as I'd like to have a look if possible. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> sure... here it is >>> >>> http://opensipstack.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opensipstack/include/utils/ABNF.h?view=markup >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: Thomas R. <tho...@it...> - 2008-02-20 07:19:29
|
Do you have any 'sample' code in regards to just plain parsing of messages (that works?) as I'd like to test it. I did read quite a portion of the code yesterday after downloading it from svn ;) Also I was wondering .. the state machine is going to be rather tied in with the transport and the timers right? (afaik it's like that in the current oss release version as well as I didn't really see a way to separate those..) Regards -----Original Message----- From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 16:09 To: ope...@li... Cc: jo...@op... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) Everything is pretty much on a state of flux at this point but I am nearing fully testable components say in two weeks time. ABNF SIP core component is pretty much complete as it is. Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > Just browsed through some of the files on ViewVC and was wondering just how 'usable'/testable is the new implementation at the moment? At all or are you still 'just' working on the ABNF grammer itself? > > Regards, > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... > Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:58 > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) > > I guess all roads lead to TR3 ;-) > > Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > >> :) >> This is quite a funny coincidence as I just wrote my/our own (Sip) TransportManager (UDP, TCP, TLS) using boost and boost::asio hehe >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... >> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:30 >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >> >> Thomas Raschbacher wrote: >> >> >>> Interesting. >>> >>> I didn't know that there was such a big version change imminent .. is there a list of planned changes/features somewhere? >>> >>> >>> >> Ok, before I get people panicking. Vesion 1 of OpenSIPStack will still >> be actively maintained and improved and will remain as the official >> active branch of the project for a long time. Version 2 of the library >> aims to improve on various part of version 1's architecture which would >> be very hard to improve on without affecting stability of existing >> code. Slowly, all functionalities of version 1 will be ported to >> version 2 until such time finally arrives when v2 is as great as version 1. >> >> >> >>> Also what is going to be used instead of pwlib? >>> >>> >>> >> For opensipstack, it will be purely STL avoiding third party >> dependencies as much as possible. For applications BOOST and ASIO are >> one of the possibilities. >> >> >> >> >>> Regards, >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor >>> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:13 >>> To: ope...@li... >>> Cc: jo...@op... >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >>> >>> Thomas Raschbacher wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi again >>>> >>>> You are of course right it is EBNF not ABNF I misread there ;) >>>> The thing is though that last time I tried to compile something with it that was more than just an example I got a 150kB error message :( >>>> >>>> Anyway the parser you are working on .. will it be able to deal with the previously mentioned test request (http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/test1.txt) ? (it's not vitally important that it can just curious about that one really) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Yes. That's the whole idea of the ABNF parser. If ABNF allows it, >>> then its a valid header. You will be surprised how screwed up messages >>> can be yet can still be valid as far as ABNF is concerned. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Apart from that will the new parser be api compatible (or at least easy to exchange) with the existing one? (also I'd need to be able to use it without the opensipstack transports ..) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Backward compatibility is not a guarantee since the new stack will no >>> longer be dependent to PWLIB which is a big architectural change. What >>> I can promise is anyone already familiar with OpenSIPStack should not >>> have a hard time migrating codes from version 1 to version 2 of the library. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... >>>> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 12:50 >>>> To: ope...@li... >>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >>>> >>>> >>>> AFAIK boost::spirits is an EBNF parser and not ABNF. However, I'm sure >>>> it can be stretched to do SIP Parsing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Is any code for this available somewhere already as I'd like to have a look if possible. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> sure... here it is >>>> >>>> http://opensipstack.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opensipstack/include/utils/ABNF.h?view=markup >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-02-20 11:57:22
|
Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > Do you have any 'sample' code in regards to just plain parsing of messages (that works?) as I'd like to test it. I did read quite a portion of the code yesterday after downloading it from svn ;) > I am glad about your excitement. I wish I could say yes but It's really not there yet. I sure will announce to the list once a preview is available. > Also I was wondering .. the state machine is going to be rather tied in with the transport and the timers right? (afaik it's like that in the current oss release version as well as I didn't really see a way to separate those..) > Timers and the transaction layer are glued together yes. However, the transport can be separate by adding an extra level of indirection. The new stack will be transport agnostic. Developers are free to use whatever transport they like if they do not like to reuse the transport module that will be used by oss applications. > Regards > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor > Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 16:09 > To: ope...@li... > Cc: jo...@op... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) > > Everything is pretty much on a state of flux at this point but I am > nearing fully testable components say in two weeks time. ABNF SIP core > component is pretty much complete as it is. > > Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > >> Just browsed through some of the files on ViewVC and was wondering just how 'usable'/testable is the new implementation at the moment? At all or are you still 'just' working on the ABNF grammer itself? >> >> Regards, >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... >> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:58 >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >> >> I guess all roads lead to TR3 ;-) >> >> Thomas Raschbacher wrote: >> >> >>> :) >>> This is quite a funny coincidence as I just wrote my/our own (Sip) TransportManager (UDP, TCP, TLS) using boost and boost::asio hehe >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... >>> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:30 >>> To: ope...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >>> >>> Thomas Raschbacher wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Interesting. >>>> >>>> I didn't know that there was such a big version change imminent .. is there a list of planned changes/features somewhere? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Ok, before I get people panicking. Vesion 1 of OpenSIPStack will still >>> be actively maintained and improved and will remain as the official >>> active branch of the project for a long time. Version 2 of the library >>> aims to improve on various part of version 1's architecture which would >>> be very hard to improve on without affecting stability of existing >>> code. Slowly, all functionalities of version 1 will be ported to >>> version 2 until such time finally arrives when v2 is as great as version 1. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Also what is going to be used instead of pwlib? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> For opensipstack, it will be purely STL avoiding third party >>> dependencies as much as possible. For applications BOOST and ASIO are >>> one of the possibilities. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor >>>> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:13 >>>> To: ope...@li... >>>> Cc: jo...@op... >>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >>>> >>>> Thomas Raschbacher wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi again >>>>> >>>>> You are of course right it is EBNF not ABNF I misread there ;) >>>>> The thing is though that last time I tried to compile something with it that was more than just an example I got a 150kB error message :( >>>>> >>>>> Anyway the parser you are working on .. will it be able to deal with the previously mentioned test request (http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/test1.txt) ? (it's not vitally important that it can just curious about that one really) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Yes. That's the whole idea of the ABNF parser. If ABNF allows it, >>>> then its a valid header. You will be surprised how screwed up messages >>>> can be yet can still be valid as far as ABNF is concerned. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Apart from that will the new parser be api compatible (or at least easy to exchange) with the existing one? (also I'd need to be able to use it without the opensipstack transports ..) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Backward compatibility is not a guarantee since the new stack will no >>>> longer be dependent to PWLIB which is a big architectural change. What >>>> I can promise is anyone already familiar with OpenSIPStack should not >>>> have a hard time migrating codes from version 1 to version 2 of the library. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... >>>>> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 12:50 >>>>> To: ope...@li... >>>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> AFAIK boost::spirits is an EBNF parser and not ABNF. However, I'm sure >>>>> it can be stretched to do SIP Parsing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Is any code for this available somewhere already as I'd like to have a look if possible. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> sure... here it is >>>>> >>>>> http://opensipstack.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opensipstack/include/utils/ABNF.h?view=markup >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>> ope...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>> ope...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2008-02-19 15:08:38
|
Everything is pretty much on a state of flux at this point but I am nearing fully testable components say in two weeks time. ABNF SIP core component is pretty much complete as it is. Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > Just browsed through some of the files on ViewVC and was wondering just how 'usable'/testable is the new implementation at the moment? At all or are you still 'just' working on the ABNF grammer itself? > > Regards, > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... > Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:58 > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) > > I guess all roads lead to TR3 ;-) > > Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > >> :) >> This is quite a funny coincidence as I just wrote my/our own (Sip) TransportManager (UDP, TCP, TLS) using boost and boost::asio hehe >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... >> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:30 >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >> >> Thomas Raschbacher wrote: >> >> >>> Interesting. >>> >>> I didn't know that there was such a big version change imminent .. is there a list of planned changes/features somewhere? >>> >>> >>> >> Ok, before I get people panicking. Vesion 1 of OpenSIPStack will still >> be actively maintained and improved and will remain as the official >> active branch of the project for a long time. Version 2 of the library >> aims to improve on various part of version 1's architecture which would >> be very hard to improve on without affecting stability of existing >> code. Slowly, all functionalities of version 1 will be ported to >> version 2 until such time finally arrives when v2 is as great as version 1. >> >> >> >>> Also what is going to be used instead of pwlib? >>> >>> >>> >> For opensipstack, it will be purely STL avoiding third party >> dependencies as much as possible. For applications BOOST and ASIO are >> one of the possibilities. >> >> >> >> >>> Regards, >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor >>> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 13:13 >>> To: ope...@li... >>> Cc: jo...@op... >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >>> >>> Thomas Raschbacher wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi again >>>> >>>> You are of course right it is EBNF not ABNF I misread there ;) >>>> The thing is though that last time I tried to compile something with it that was more than just an example I got a 150kB error message :( >>>> >>>> Anyway the parser you are working on .. will it be able to deal with the previously mentioned test request (http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/sipit/test1.txt) ? (it's not vitally important that it can just curious about that one really) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Yes. That's the whole idea of the ABNF parser. If ABNF allows it, >>> then its a valid header. You will be surprised how screwed up messages >>> can be yet can still be valid as far as ABNF is concerned. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Apart from that will the new parser be api compatible (or at least easy to exchange) with the existing one? (also I'd need to be able to use it without the opensipstack transports ..) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Backward compatibility is not a guarantee since the new stack will no >>> longer be dependent to PWLIB which is a big architectural change. What >>> I can promise is anyone already familiar with OpenSIPStack should not >>> have a hard time migrating codes from version 1 to version 2 of the library. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... >>>> Sent: Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 12:50 >>>> To: ope...@li... >>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Sip Test Messages (Was: RE: SIPMessage & SDPLazyParser) >>>> >>>> >>>> AFAIK boost::spirits is an EBNF parser and not ABNF. However, I'm sure >>>> it can be stretched to do SIP Parsing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Is any code for this available somewhere already as I'd like to have a look if possible. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> sure... here it is >>>> >>>> http://opensipstack.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opensipstack/include/utils/ABNF.h?view=markup >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X