Thread: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC SIP multipart behaviour
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
Menu
▾
▴
opensipstack-devel
|
From: Craig G. <cra...@gm...> - 2007-09-19 14:25:39
|
Hi, I am currently doing interop testing with Level3 who are a tier 1 VoIP provider in the USA. The architecture I am using has a single box running OpenSBC listening on port 5060 and a copy of Callweaver running on port 10060 behind OpenSBC. OpenSBC is running in B2BUA mode with upper registration and is handling both SIP and RTP. I have found during interop testing that OpenSBC is not preserving the SDP when initiating the second leg of the call to Callweaver, causing Callweaver to reject the call with '488 - Not Acceptable Here'. The difference between the Level3 SIP and other SIP that I've seen is that Level3 are including multiple parts in the message body. If I take OpenSBC out of the equation and have Level3 talk directly to my Callweaver then there is no problem. I have included two tcpdumps of a session. The first dump, wanside.cap is the session from Level3 to OpenSBC and the second dump (lanside.cap) is the session between OpenSBC and Callweaver. I am happy to capture and provide OpenSBC log and debug if required. I'd be interested to know if this is a bug, or otherwise. Craig |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-09-19 14:35:31
|
Craig, You forgot to attach the pcap files. Joegen Craig Guy wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am currently doing interop testing with Level3 who are a tier 1 VoIP > provider in the USA. The architecture I am using has a single box running > OpenSBC listening on port 5060 and a copy of Callweaver running on port > 10060 behind OpenSBC. OpenSBC is running in B2BUA mode with upper > registration and is handling both SIP and RTP. > > > > I have found during interop testing that OpenSBC is not preserving the SDP > when initiating the second leg of the call to Callweaver, causing Callweaver > to reject the call with '488 - Not Acceptable Here'. > > > > The difference between the Level3 SIP and other SIP that I've seen is that > Level3 are including multiple parts in the message body. If I take OpenSBC > out of the equation and have Level3 talk directly to my Callweaver then > there is no problem. > > > > I have included two tcpdumps of a session. The first dump, wanside.cap is > the session from Level3 to OpenSBC and the second dump (lanside.cap) is the > session between OpenSBC and Callweaver. I am happy to capture and provide > OpenSBC log and debug if required. > > > > I'd be interested to know if this is a bug, or otherwise. > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.22/1015 - Release Date: 9/18/2007 11:53 AM > |
|
From: Craig G. <cra...@gm...> - 2007-09-19 14:43:39
|
Hmmm, I did definitely include them - and they are attached to the email in my sent items, must have been stripped by Gmail or something. You can download them from http://manky.ath.cx/lanside.cap and http://manky.ath.cx/wanside.cap Craig -----Original Message----- From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 10:35 PM To: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC SIP multipart behaviour Craig, You forgot to attach the pcap files. Joegen Craig Guy wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am currently doing interop testing with Level3 who are a tier 1 VoIP > provider in the USA. The architecture I am using has a single box running > OpenSBC listening on port 5060 and a copy of Callweaver running on port > 10060 behind OpenSBC. OpenSBC is running in B2BUA mode with upper > registration and is handling both SIP and RTP. > > > > I have found during interop testing that OpenSBC is not preserving the SDP > when initiating the second leg of the call to Callweaver, causing Callweaver > to reject the call with '488 - Not Acceptable Here'. > > > > The difference between the Level3 SIP and other SIP that I've seen is that > Level3 are including multiple parts in the message body. If I take OpenSBC > out of the equation and have Level3 talk directly to my Callweaver then > there is no problem. > > > > I have included two tcpdumps of a session. The first dump, wanside.cap is > the session from Level3 to OpenSBC and the second dump (lanside.cap) is the > session between OpenSBC and Callweaver. I am happy to capture and provide > OpenSBC log and debug if required. > > > > I'd be interested to know if this is a bug, or otherwise. > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.22/1015 - Release Date: 9/18/2007 11:53 AM > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2007-09-19 14:55:44
|
Craig, Both links are 404. Let me know when you get them handy for me to see. Craig Guy wrote: > Hmmm, > > I did definitely include them - and they are attached to the email in my > sent items, must have been stripped by Gmail or something. > > You can download them from http://manky.ath.cx/lanside.cap and > http://manky.ath.cx/wanside.cap > > Craig > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... > [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of > Joegen E. Baclor > Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 10:35 PM > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC SIP multipart behaviour > > Craig, > > You forgot to attach the pcap files. > > Joegen > > Craig Guy wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I am currently doing interop testing with Level3 who are a tier 1 VoIP >> provider in the USA. The architecture I am using has a single box running >> OpenSBC listening on port 5060 and a copy of Callweaver running on port >> 10060 behind OpenSBC. OpenSBC is running in B2BUA mode with upper >> registration and is handling both SIP and RTP. >> >> >> >> I have found during interop testing that OpenSBC is not preserving the SDP >> when initiating the second leg of the call to Callweaver, causing >> > Callweaver > >> to reject the call with '488 - Not Acceptable Here'. >> >> >> >> The difference between the Level3 SIP and other SIP that I've seen is that >> Level3 are including multiple parts in the message body. If I take >> > OpenSBC > >> out of the equation and have Level3 talk directly to my Callweaver then >> there is no problem. >> >> >> >> I have included two tcpdumps of a session. The first dump, wanside.cap is >> the session from Level3 to OpenSBC and the second dump (lanside.cap) is >> > the > >> session between OpenSBC and Callweaver. I am happy to capture and provide >> OpenSBC log and debug if required. >> >> >> >> I'd be interested to know if this is a bug, or otherwise. >> >> >> >> Craig >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.22/1015 - Release Date: >> > 9/18/2007 11:53 AM > >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > > |
|
From: Craig G. <cra...@gm...> - 2007-09-19 15:09:49
|
Hi Joegen, Ok, I have placed them at http://nomates.ath.cx/wanside.cap and lanside.cap and have verified their availability from another network. Please let me know they are still unavailable. Craig -----Original Message----- From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of jo...@op... Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 10:56 PM To: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC SIP multipart behaviour Craig, Both links are 404. Let me know when you get them handy for me to see. Craig Guy wrote: > Hmmm, > > I did definitely include them - and they are attached to the email in my > sent items, must have been stripped by Gmail or something. > > You can download them from http://manky.ath.cx/lanside.cap and > http://manky.ath.cx/wanside.cap > > Craig > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... > [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of > Joegen E. Baclor > Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 10:35 PM > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC SIP multipart behaviour > > Craig, > > You forgot to attach the pcap files. > > Joegen > > Craig Guy wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I am currently doing interop testing with Level3 who are a tier 1 VoIP >> provider in the USA. The architecture I am using has a single box running >> OpenSBC listening on port 5060 and a copy of Callweaver running on port >> 10060 behind OpenSBC. OpenSBC is running in B2BUA mode with upper >> registration and is handling both SIP and RTP. >> >> >> >> I have found during interop testing that OpenSBC is not preserving the SDP >> when initiating the second leg of the call to Callweaver, causing >> > Callweaver > >> to reject the call with '488 - Not Acceptable Here'. >> >> >> >> The difference between the Level3 SIP and other SIP that I've seen is that >> Level3 are including multiple parts in the message body. If I take >> > OpenSBC > >> out of the equation and have Level3 talk directly to my Callweaver then >> there is no problem. >> >> >> >> I have included two tcpdumps of a session. The first dump, wanside.cap is >> the session from Level3 to OpenSBC and the second dump (lanside.cap) is >> > the > >> session between OpenSBC and Callweaver. I am happy to capture and provide >> OpenSBC log and debug if required. >> >> >> >> I'd be interested to know if this is a bug, or otherwise. >> >> >> >> Craig >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.22/1015 - Release Date: >> > 9/18/2007 11:53 AM > >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2007-09-19 15:22:17
|
Hi Craig, I got the captures. For starters, I must admit that OpenSIPStack does not support multipart /mixed as of the moment. Buts since there is now a real need to support mutipart in the parser, I will be willing to take it on personally. I can't promise a target date as of the moment because I am full with other milestone tasks as of the moment. I might be asking you to perform tests every now and then if you are willing to work this out with me. Joegen Craig Guy wrote: > Hi Joegen, > > Ok, I have placed them at http://nomates.ath.cx/wanside.cap and lanside.cap > and have verified their availability from another network. Please let me > know they are still unavailable. > > Craig > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... > [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of > jo...@op... > Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 10:56 PM > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC SIP multipart behaviour > > Craig, > > Both links are 404. Let me know when you get them handy for me to see. > > > > Craig Guy wrote: > >> Hmmm, >> >> I did definitely include them - and they are attached to the email in my >> sent items, must have been stripped by Gmail or something. >> >> You can download them from http://manky.ath.cx/lanside.cap and >> http://manky.ath.cx/wanside.cap >> >> Craig >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ope...@li... >> [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of >> Joegen E. Baclor >> Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 10:35 PM >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC SIP multipart behaviour >> >> Craig, >> >> You forgot to attach the pcap files. >> >> Joegen >> >> Craig Guy wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I am currently doing interop testing with Level3 who are a tier 1 VoIP >>> provider in the USA. The architecture I am using has a single box >>> > running > >>> OpenSBC listening on port 5060 and a copy of Callweaver running on port >>> 10060 behind OpenSBC. OpenSBC is running in B2BUA mode with upper >>> registration and is handling both SIP and RTP. >>> >>> >>> >>> I have found during interop testing that OpenSBC is not preserving the >>> > SDP > >>> when initiating the second leg of the call to Callweaver, causing >>> >>> >> Callweaver >> >> >>> to reject the call with '488 - Not Acceptable Here'. >>> >>> >>> >>> The difference between the Level3 SIP and other SIP that I've seen is >>> > that > >>> Level3 are including multiple parts in the message body. If I take >>> >>> >> OpenSBC >> >> >>> out of the equation and have Level3 talk directly to my Callweaver then >>> there is no problem. >>> >>> >>> >>> I have included two tcpdumps of a session. The first dump, wanside.cap >>> > is > >>> the session from Level3 to OpenSBC and the second dump (lanside.cap) is >>> >>> >> the >> >> >>> session between OpenSBC and Callweaver. I am happy to capture and >>> > provide > >>> OpenSBC log and debug if required. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'd be interested to know if this is a bug, or otherwise. >>> >>> >>> >>> Craig >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>> Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.22/1015 - Release Date: >>> >>> >> 9/18/2007 11:53 AM >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > > > |
|
From: Craig G. <cra...@gm...> - 2007-09-19 15:31:17
|
Thankyou Joegen, I am more than willing to perform any required testing to help out with this, and I appreciate your interest in the issue. Craig -----Original Message----- From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...] Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 11:22 PM To: Craig Guy Cc: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC SIP multipart behaviour Hi Craig, I got the captures. For starters, I must admit that OpenSIPStack does not support multipart /mixed as of the moment. Buts since there is now a real need to support mutipart in the parser, I will be willing to take it on personally. I can't promise a target date as of the moment because I am full with other milestone tasks as of the moment. I might be asking you to perform tests every now and then if you are willing to work this out with me. Joegen Craig Guy wrote: > Hi Joegen, > > Ok, I have placed them at http://nomates.ath.cx/wanside.cap and lanside.cap > and have verified their availability from another network. Please let me > know they are still unavailable. > > Craig > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... > [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of > jo...@op... > Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 10:56 PM > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC SIP multipart behaviour > > Craig, > > Both links are 404. Let me know when you get them handy for me to see. > > > > Craig Guy wrote: > >> Hmmm, >> >> I did definitely include them - and they are attached to the email in my >> sent items, must have been stripped by Gmail or something. >> >> You can download them from http://manky.ath.cx/lanside.cap and >> http://manky.ath.cx/wanside.cap >> >> Craig >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ope...@li... >> [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of >> Joegen E. Baclor >> Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 10:35 PM >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC SIP multipart behaviour >> >> Craig, >> >> You forgot to attach the pcap files. >> >> Joegen >> >> Craig Guy wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I am currently doing interop testing with Level3 who are a tier 1 VoIP >>> provider in the USA. The architecture I am using has a single box >>> > running > >>> OpenSBC listening on port 5060 and a copy of Callweaver running on port >>> 10060 behind OpenSBC. OpenSBC is running in B2BUA mode with upper >>> registration and is handling both SIP and RTP. >>> >>> >>> >>> I have found during interop testing that OpenSBC is not preserving the >>> > SDP > >>> when initiating the second leg of the call to Callweaver, causing >>> >>> >> Callweaver >> >> >>> to reject the call with '488 - Not Acceptable Here'. >>> >>> >>> >>> The difference between the Level3 SIP and other SIP that I've seen is >>> > that > >>> Level3 are including multiple parts in the message body. If I take >>> >>> >> OpenSBC >> >> >>> out of the equation and have Level3 talk directly to my Callweaver then >>> there is no problem. >>> >>> >>> >>> I have included two tcpdumps of a session. The first dump, wanside.cap >>> > is > >>> the session from Level3 to OpenSBC and the second dump (lanside.cap) is >>> >>> >> the >> >> >>> session between OpenSBC and Callweaver. I am happy to capture and >>> > provide > >>> OpenSBC log and debug if required. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'd be interested to know if this is a bug, or otherwise. >>> >>> >>> >>> Craig >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>> Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.22/1015 - Release Date: >>> >>> >> 9/18/2007 11:53 AM >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > > > |
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2007-09-19 15:33:51
|
Hi Craig, I have opened a ticket in the bug tracker for this issue. http://bugs.opensourcesip.org/index.php?redir_bug=4 Craig Guy wrote: > Thankyou Joegen, > > I am more than willing to perform any required testing to help out with > this, and I appreciate your interest in the issue. > > Craig > > -----Original Message----- > From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...] > Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 11:22 PM > To: Craig Guy > Cc: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC SIP multipart behaviour > > Hi Craig, > > I got the captures. For starters, I must admit that OpenSIPStack does > not support multipart /mixed as of the moment. Buts since there is now > a real need to support mutipart in the parser, I will be willing to take > it on personally. I can't promise a target date as of the moment > because I am full with other milestone tasks as of the moment. I might > be asking you to perform tests every now and then if you are willing to > work this out with me. > > Joegen > > > Craig Guy wrote: > >> Hi Joegen, >> >> Ok, I have placed them at http://nomates.ath.cx/wanside.cap and >> > lanside.cap > >> and have verified their availability from another network. Please let me >> know they are still unavailable. >> >> Craig >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ope...@li... >> [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of >> jo...@op... >> Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 10:56 PM >> To: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC SIP multipart behaviour >> >> Craig, >> >> Both links are 404. Let me know when you get them handy for me to see. >> >> >> >> Craig Guy wrote: >> >> >>> Hmmm, >>> >>> I did definitely include them - and they are attached to the email in my >>> sent items, must have been stripped by Gmail or something. >>> >>> You can download them from http://manky.ath.cx/lanside.cap and >>> http://manky.ath.cx/wanside.cap >>> >>> Craig >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ope...@li... >>> [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of >>> Joegen E. Baclor >>> Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 10:35 PM >>> To: ope...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC SIP multipart behaviour >>> >>> Craig, >>> >>> You forgot to attach the pcap files. >>> >>> Joegen >>> >>> Craig Guy wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I am currently doing interop testing with Level3 who are a tier 1 VoIP >>>> provider in the USA. The architecture I am using has a single box >>>> >>>> >> running >> >> >>>> OpenSBC listening on port 5060 and a copy of Callweaver running on port >>>> 10060 behind OpenSBC. OpenSBC is running in B2BUA mode with upper >>>> registration and is handling both SIP and RTP. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have found during interop testing that OpenSBC is not preserving the >>>> >>>> >> SDP >> >> >>>> when initiating the second leg of the call to Callweaver, causing >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Callweaver >>> >>> >>> >>>> to reject the call with '488 - Not Acceptable Here'. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The difference between the Level3 SIP and other SIP that I've seen is >>>> >>>> >> that >> >> >>>> Level3 are including multiple parts in the message body. If I take >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> OpenSBC >>> >>> >>> >>>> out of the equation and have Level3 talk directly to my Callweaver then >>>> there is no problem. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have included two tcpdumps of a session. The first dump, wanside.cap >>>> >>>> >> is >> >> >>>> the session from Level3 to OpenSBC and the second dump (lanside.cap) is >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> the >>> >>> >>> >>>> session between OpenSBC and Callweaver. I am happy to capture and >>>> >>>> >> provide >> >> >>>> OpenSBC log and debug if required. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'd be interested to know if this is a bug, or otherwise. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Craig >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>>> Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.22/1015 - Release Date: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> 9/18/2007 11:53 AM >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > > |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X