opensipstack-devel Mailing List for OpenSIPStack (Page 58)
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
You can subscribe to this list here.
2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(67) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(76) |
May
(114) |
Jun
(133) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(109) |
Dec
(92) |
2008 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(83) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(80) |
2009 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(67) |
May
|
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(2) |
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: tomach <to...@dg...> - 2007-06-20 08:32:15
|
Hello! Ok call connections works fine etc... I would like to ask how your activex works? How your activex works? When call is created? is it working in separate thread then main winform application? Bacause I noticed that winforms do not hang and react normally so its ok (main thread is not stoped). But my problem is that when I run your application (sample VB) under visual studio events come but they do NOT update controls. When I run the same application under cmd line everything works fine events come and update controls. Do you had similar reaction under Visual Studio 2005? I am really curious why is it happening? any suggestions? |
From: Gaurav K. <gk...@ve...> - 2007-06-20 07:58:09
|
Joegen I tried with the fix but still getting the same issue. I am attaching the log for the same. Is there some issue with Upper registration configuration? I am doing the following configuration in upper registration: [sip:*@velankani.com] sip:velankani.com Regards, Gaurav Kansal -----Original Message----- From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Joegen E. Baclor Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:22 PM To: jb...@so...; ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC with FOKUS openIMS Gaurav, Bug Fix for Query1 is now in CVS. Please retest and let me know if you hit more roadblocks. Joegen E. Baclor wrote: > Hi Gaurav, > > Gaurav Kansal wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I am trying to use OpenSBC with FOKUS OpenIMS. I have following 2 queries: >> >> Query1: >> I am using the following setup: >> >> UE-----P-CSCF-----OpenSBC-----I/CSCF----S/CSCF >> >> UE: 10.0.64.11:3422 >> OpenSBC: 10.0.64.17:7060 >> >> P-CSCF is configured to forward all messages to OpenSBC. OpenSBC is >> configured to forward all messages coming from UE to I-CSCF. The outbound >> proxy in UE is set as P-CSCF. >> >> When UE sends the REGISTER, Contact header contains 10.0.64.11:3422. OpenSBC >> changes it to 10.0.64.17:1544 (one more address on which OpenSBC is >> listening) before forwarding to I-CSCF. >> >> In the response from S-CSCF to I-CSCF, contact address is 10.0.64.17:1544. >> In this response message when OpenSBC forwards to P-CSCF, contact address >> still remains 10.0.64.17:1544. OpenSBC doesn't translate it back to >> 10.0.64.11:3422. As P-CSCF gets 10.0.64.17:1544 in Contact header in >> response from S-CSCF, it updates the UE Contact address in its tables from >> 10.0.64.11:3422 to 10.0.64.17:1544 as part of registration process. >> >> UE is registered now with contact 10.0.64.17:1544 at P-CSCF and S-CSCF. >> >> Now when UE initiates INVITE message, the contact address in the message is >> 10.0.64.11:3422. But in P-CSCF's table, the contact address for the same UE >> is 10.0.64.17:1544. Due to this mismatch, P-CSCF discards the message saying >> that User should first register with S-CSCF. >> >> The issue is that OpenSBC is not re-translating the contact address (to what >> UE sent in the request) in the REGISTER response which it sends to UE. >> >> Has anyone used OpenSBC with FOKUS OpenIMS? Can anyone point out the >> issue here? >> >> > > Thanks for the clear explanation. Yes, OpenSBC is at fault here. I > will make some modification to get around this problem in a while. > Thanks for pointing it out. > > > >> Query2: >> UE-----P-CSCF-----I/CSCF----S/CSCF-----OpenSBC------OtherDomain >> Here how to configure OpenSBC to remove P-Asserted-Identity from the >> INVITE message before it forwards the message to OtherDomain when call >> comes in with the Privacy header. >> >> > > The default behavior of OpenSBC is to strip the P-Asserted-Identity if > the destination domain is not listed in the "Privacy (RFC 3265)" section > of the admin page. Are you saying this is not happening? > > > >> Regards, >> Gaurav Kansal >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - >> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take >> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. >> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > -- Joegen E. Baclor CTO - Solegy LLC Email: joegen @ solegy.com Main: +1 212 801 2513 Fax: +1 347 438 3072 Manila: +63 2 747 3460 Mobile: +63 918 411 9064 121 Varick St., Suite 201 NY, NY 10013 SOLEGY LLC http://www.solegy.com Solutions to Fit Your Strategy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
From: Devendra <dev...@ao...> - 2007-06-20 05:28:19
|
HI, I am Not able to Download the Open SBC . The link is not working Regards Devendra |
From: Gaurav K. <gk...@ve...> - 2007-06-20 04:49:58
|
Hi Joegen Please find attached logs for Query2. bob@open-ims.test is calling Ka...@ve... as anonymous. In OpenSBC, I have configured sip:open-ims.test in "Domain" in Privacy. I tried without any configuration in "Privacy" also. Regards, Gaurav Kansal Velankani Software Private Limited, 43, Electronics City, Phase - 2, Hosur Road, Bangalore - 560100 Phone : +91 80 4037 5300/01 Extn. # 5401 Direct: +91 80 4037 5401 Fax : +91 80 4037 5303 Mobile: +91 98454 22400 gk...@ve... www.velankani.com "Every Customer is a Reference Customer" -----Original Message----- From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Gaurav Kansal Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 8:49 PM To: jb...@so...; ope...@li...; Joegen E. Baclor Cc: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OpenSBC with FOKUS openIMS Hi Joegen Thanks for the response. In my Query2, OpenSBC was not removing the P-Asserted-Identity. In the configuration in OpenSBC, I had added the originating domain as trusted domain for OpenSBC. I assume that all other domains will be non-trusted (OtherDomain). Can you please check this? If OpenSBC is working fine, then I may be incorrectly configuring the OpenSBC. Any pointers will be helpful. Regards, Gaurav Kansal Velankani Software Private Limited, 43, Electronics City, Phase - 2, Hosur Road, Bangalore - 560100 Phone : +91 80 4037 5300/01 Extn. # 5401 Direct: +91 80 4037 5401 Fax : +91 80 4037 5303 Mobile: +91 98454 22400 gk...@ve... www.velankani.com "Every Customer is a Reference Customer" Quoting "Joegen E. Baclor" <joe...@gm...>: > > Hi Gaurav, > > Gaurav Kansal wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am trying to use OpenSBC with FOKUS OpenIMS. I have following 2 queries: >> >> Query1: >> I am using the following setup: >> >> UE-----P-CSCF-----OpenSBC-----I/CSCF----S/CSCF >> >> UE: 10.0.64.11:3422 >> OpenSBC: 10.0.64.17:7060 >> >> P-CSCF is configured to forward all messages to OpenSBC. OpenSBC is >> configured to forward all messages coming from UE to I-CSCF. The outbound >> proxy in UE is set as P-CSCF. >> >> When UE sends the REGISTER, Contact header contains 10.0.64.11:3422. OpenSBC >> changes it to 10.0.64.17:1544 (one more address on which OpenSBC is >> listening) before forwarding to I-CSCF. >> >> In the response from S-CSCF to I-CSCF, contact address is 10.0.64.17:1544. >> In this response message when OpenSBC forwards to P-CSCF, contact address >> still remains 10.0.64.17:1544. OpenSBC doesn't translate it back to >> 10.0.64.11:3422. As P-CSCF gets 10.0.64.17:1544 in Contact header in >> response from S-CSCF, it updates the UE Contact address in its tables from >> 10.0.64.11:3422 to 10.0.64.17:1544 as part of registration process. >> >> UE is registered now with contact 10.0.64.17:1544 at P-CSCF and S-CSCF. >> >> Now when UE initiates INVITE message, the contact address in the message is >> 10.0.64.11:3422. But in P-CSCF's table, the contact address for the same UE >> is 10.0.64.17:1544. Due to this mismatch, P-CSCF discards the message saying >> that User should first register with S-CSCF. >> >> The issue is that OpenSBC is not re-translating the contact address (to what >> UE sent in the request) in the REGISTER response which it sends to UE. >> >> Has anyone used OpenSBC with FOKUS OpenIMS? Can anyone point out the >> issue here? >> > > Thanks for the clear explanation. Yes, OpenSBC is at fault here. I > will make some modification to get around this problem in a while. > Thanks for pointing it out. > > >> Query2: >> UE-----P-CSCF-----I/CSCF----S/CSCF-----OpenSBC------OtherDomain >> Here how to configure OpenSBC to remove P-Asserted-Identity from the >> INVITE message before it forwards the message to OtherDomain when call >> comes in with the Privacy header. >> > > The default behavior of OpenSBC is to strip the P-Asserted-Identity if > the destination domain is not listed in the "Privacy (RFC 3265)" section > of the admin page. Are you saying this is not happening? > > >> Regards, >> Gaurav Kansal >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - >> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take >> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. >> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
From: Joegen E. B. <jb...@so...> - 2007-06-20 03:33:56
|
> From experience with other SBC's (Tekelec, Nextone, > etc) they have a master / slave setup and a floating > virtual IP on both the public and private side of the > network. While running, the call state is mirrored > between the two in real time and in the event that > the master fails, the slave ARP's the virtual IP and > takes over the RTP and SIP. > > The result would be a fully redundant SBC as long as > everything is configured to use the floating virtual > IP and not the "real" IP's of the SBC's Very interesting subject. I made a quick google on the subject and found this link interesting http://lcic.org/ha.html. Are you personally familiar with any of the solutions listed there? You have any suggestions how this can be integrated in OSBC? |
From: Matthew G. <fo...@op...> - 2007-06-19 19:32:28
|
>From experience with other SBC's (Tekelec, Nextone, etc) they have a master / slave setup and a floating virtual IP on both the public and private side of the network. While running, the call state is mirrored between the two in real time and in the event that the master fails, the slave ARP's the virtual IP and takes over the RTP and SIP. The result would be a fully redundant SBC as long as everything is configured to use the floating virtual IP and not the "real" IP's of the SBC's |
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-06-19 15:51:40
|
Gaurav, Bug Fix for Query1 is now in CVS. Please retest and let me know if you hit more roadblocks. Joegen E. Baclor wrote: > Hi Gaurav, > > Gaurav Kansal wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I am trying to use OpenSBC with FOKUS OpenIMS. I have following 2 queries: >> >> Query1: >> I am using the following setup: >> >> UE-----P-CSCF-----OpenSBC-----I/CSCF----S/CSCF >> >> UE: 10.0.64.11:3422 >> OpenSBC: 10.0.64.17:7060 >> >> P-CSCF is configured to forward all messages to OpenSBC. OpenSBC is >> configured to forward all messages coming from UE to I-CSCF. The outbound >> proxy in UE is set as P-CSCF. >> >> When UE sends the REGISTER, Contact header contains 10.0.64.11:3422. OpenSBC >> changes it to 10.0.64.17:1544 (one more address on which OpenSBC is >> listening) before forwarding to I-CSCF. >> >> In the response from S-CSCF to I-CSCF, contact address is 10.0.64.17:1544. >> In this response message when OpenSBC forwards to P-CSCF, contact address >> still remains 10.0.64.17:1544. OpenSBC doesn't translate it back to >> 10.0.64.11:3422. As P-CSCF gets 10.0.64.17:1544 in Contact header in >> response from S-CSCF, it updates the UE Contact address in its tables from >> 10.0.64.11:3422 to 10.0.64.17:1544 as part of registration process. >> >> UE is registered now with contact 10.0.64.17:1544 at P-CSCF and S-CSCF. >> >> Now when UE initiates INVITE message, the contact address in the message is >> 10.0.64.11:3422. But in P-CSCF's table, the contact address for the same UE >> is 10.0.64.17:1544. Due to this mismatch, P-CSCF discards the message saying >> that User should first register with S-CSCF. >> >> The issue is that OpenSBC is not re-translating the contact address (to what >> UE sent in the request) in the REGISTER response which it sends to UE. >> >> Has anyone used OpenSBC with FOKUS OpenIMS? Can anyone point out the >> issue here? >> >> > > Thanks for the clear explanation. Yes, OpenSBC is at fault here. I > will make some modification to get around this problem in a while. > Thanks for pointing it out. > > > >> Query2: >> UE-----P-CSCF-----I/CSCF----S/CSCF-----OpenSBC------OtherDomain >> Here how to configure OpenSBC to remove P-Asserted-Identity from the >> INVITE message before it forwards the message to OtherDomain when call >> comes in with the Privacy header. >> >> > > The default behavior of OpenSBC is to strip the P-Asserted-Identity if > the destination domain is not listed in the "Privacy (RFC 3265)" section > of the admin page. Are you saying this is not happening? > > > >> Regards, >> Gaurav Kansal >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take >> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. >> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > -- Joegen E. Baclor CTO - Solegy LLC Email: joegen @ solegy.com Main: +1 212 801 2513 Fax: +1 347 438 3072 Manila: +63 2 747 3460 Mobile: +63 918 411 9064 121 Varick St., Suite 201 NY, NY 10013 SOLEGY LLC http://www.solegy.com Solutions to Fit Your Strategy |
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-06-19 15:24:54
|
Gaurav Kansal wrote: > Hi Joegen > > Thanks for the response. > > In my Query2, OpenSBC was not removing the P-Asserted-Identity. In the > configuration in OpenSBC, I had added the originating domain as > trusted domain for OpenSBC. I assume that all other domains will be > non-trusted (OtherDomain). Can you please check this? If OpenSBC is > working fine, then I may be incorrectly configuring the OpenSBC. Any > pointers will be helpful. Can you email me the b2bua log demonstrating such call? You can get it from the logs folder of OpenSBC. |
From: Gaurav K. <gk...@ve...> - 2007-06-19 15:18:55
|
Hi Joegen Thanks for the response. In my Query2, OpenSBC was not removing the P-Asserted-Identity. In the =20 configuration in OpenSBC, I had added the originating domain as =20 trusted domain for OpenSBC. I assume that all other domains will be =20 non-trusted (OtherDomain). Can you please check this? If OpenSBC is =20 working fine, then I may be incorrectly configuring the OpenSBC. Any =20 pointers will be helpful. Regards, Gaurav Kansal Velankani Software Private Limited, 43, Electronics City, Phase - 2, Hosur Road, Bangalore - 560100 Phone : +91 80 4037 5300/01 Extn. # 5401 Direct: +91 80 4037 5401 Fax : +91 80 4037 5303 Mobile: +91 98454 22400 gk...@ve... www.velankani.com "Every Customer is a Reference Customer" Quoting "Joegen E. Baclor" <joe...@gm...>: > > Hi Gaurav, > > Gaurav Kansal wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am trying to use OpenSBC with FOKUS OpenIMS. I have following 2 queries= : >> >> Query1: >> I am using the following setup: >> >> UE-----P-CSCF-----OpenSBC-----I/CSCF----S/CSCF >> >> UE: 10.0.64.11:3422 >> OpenSBC: 10.0.64.17:7060 >> >> P-CSCF is configured to forward all messages to OpenSBC. OpenSBC is >> configured to forward all messages coming from UE to I-CSCF. The outbound >> proxy in UE is set as P-CSCF. >> >> When UE sends the REGISTER, Contact header contains 10.0.64.11:3422. Open= SBC >> changes it to 10.0.64.17:1544 (one more address on which OpenSBC is >> listening) before forwarding to I-CSCF. >> >> In the response from S-CSCF to I-CSCF, contact address is 10.0.64.17:1544= . >> In this response message when OpenSBC forwards to P-CSCF, contact address >> still remains 10.0.64.17:1544. OpenSBC doesn't translate it back to >> 10.0.64.11:3422. As P-CSCF gets 10.0.64.17:1544 in Contact header in >> response from S-CSCF, it updates the UE Contact address in its tables fro= m >> 10.0.64.11:3422 to 10.0.64.17:1544 as part of registration process. >> >> UE is registered now with contact 10.0.64.17:1544 at P-CSCF and S-CSCF. >> >> Now when UE initiates INVITE message, the contact address in the message = is >> 10.0.64.11:3422. But in P-CSCF's table, the contact address for the same = UE >> is 10.0.64.17:1544. Due to this mismatch, P-CSCF discards the message say= ing >> that User should first register with S-CSCF. >> >> The issue is that OpenSBC is not re-translating the contact address (to w= hat >> UE sent in the request) in the REGISTER response which it sends to UE. >> >> Has anyone used OpenSBC with FOKUS OpenIMS? Can anyone point out the >> issue here? >> > > Thanks for the clear explanation. Yes, OpenSBC is at fault here. I > will make some modification to get around this problem in a while. > Thanks for pointing it out. > > >> Query2: >> UE-----P-CSCF-----I/CSCF----S/CSCF-----OpenSBC------OtherDomain >> Here how to configure OpenSBC to remove P-Asserted-Identity from the >> INVITE message before it forwards the message to OtherDomain when call >> comes in with the Privacy header. >> > > The default behavior of OpenSBC is to strip the P-Asserted-Identity if > the destination domain is not listed in the "Privacy (RFC 3265)" section > of the admin page. Are you saying this is not happening? > > >> Regards, >> Gaurav Kansal >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take >> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. >> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > |
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-06-19 15:05:26
|
Hi Gaurav, Gaurav Kansal wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to use OpenSBC with FOKUS OpenIMS. I have following 2 queries: > > Query1: > I am using the following setup: > > UE-----P-CSCF-----OpenSBC-----I/CSCF----S/CSCF > > UE: 10.0.64.11:3422 > OpenSBC: 10.0.64.17:7060 > > P-CSCF is configured to forward all messages to OpenSBC. OpenSBC is > configured to forward all messages coming from UE to I-CSCF. The outbound > proxy in UE is set as P-CSCF. > > When UE sends the REGISTER, Contact header contains 10.0.64.11:3422. OpenSBC > changes it to 10.0.64.17:1544 (one more address on which OpenSBC is > listening) before forwarding to I-CSCF. > > In the response from S-CSCF to I-CSCF, contact address is 10.0.64.17:1544. > In this response message when OpenSBC forwards to P-CSCF, contact address > still remains 10.0.64.17:1544. OpenSBC doesn't translate it back to > 10.0.64.11:3422. As P-CSCF gets 10.0.64.17:1544 in Contact header in > response from S-CSCF, it updates the UE Contact address in its tables from > 10.0.64.11:3422 to 10.0.64.17:1544 as part of registration process. > > UE is registered now with contact 10.0.64.17:1544 at P-CSCF and S-CSCF. > > Now when UE initiates INVITE message, the contact address in the message is > 10.0.64.11:3422. But in P-CSCF's table, the contact address for the same UE > is 10.0.64.17:1544. Due to this mismatch, P-CSCF discards the message saying > that User should first register with S-CSCF. > > The issue is that OpenSBC is not re-translating the contact address (to what > UE sent in the request) in the REGISTER response which it sends to UE. > > Has anyone used OpenSBC with FOKUS OpenIMS? Can anyone point out the > issue here? > Thanks for the clear explanation. Yes, OpenSBC is at fault here. I will make some modification to get around this problem in a while. Thanks for pointing it out. > Query2: > UE-----P-CSCF-----I/CSCF----S/CSCF-----OpenSBC------OtherDomain > Here how to configure OpenSBC to remove P-Asserted-Identity from the > INVITE message before it forwards the message to OtherDomain when call > comes in with the Privacy header. > The default behavior of OpenSBC is to strip the P-Asserted-Identity if the destination domain is not listed in the "Privacy (RFC 3265)" section of the admin page. Are you saying this is not happening? > Regards, > Gaurav Kansal > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
From: Gaurav K. <gk...@ve...> - 2007-06-19 14:18:57
|
Hi I am trying to use OpenSBC with FOKUS OpenIMS. I have following 2 queries: Query1: I am using the following setup: UE-----P-CSCF-----OpenSBC-----I/CSCF----S/CSCF UE: 10.0.64.11:3422 OpenSBC: 10.0.64.17:7060 P-CSCF is configured to forward all messages to OpenSBC. OpenSBC is configured to forward all messages coming from UE to I-CSCF. The outbound proxy in UE is set as P-CSCF. When UE sends the REGISTER, Contact header contains 10.0.64.11:3422. OpenSBC changes it to 10.0.64.17:1544 (one more address on which OpenSBC is listening) before forwarding to I-CSCF. In the response from S-CSCF to I-CSCF, contact address is 10.0.64.17:1544. In this response message when OpenSBC forwards to P-CSCF, contact address still remains 10.0.64.17:1544. OpenSBC doesn't translate it back to 10.0.64.11:3422. As P-CSCF gets 10.0.64.17:1544 in Contact header in response from S-CSCF, it updates the UE Contact address in its tables from 10.0.64.11:3422 to 10.0.64.17:1544 as part of registration process. UE is registered now with contact 10.0.64.17:1544 at P-CSCF and S-CSCF. Now when UE initiates INVITE message, the contact address in the message is 10.0.64.11:3422. But in P-CSCF's table, the contact address for the same UE is 10.0.64.17:1544. Due to this mismatch, P-CSCF discards the message saying that User should first register with S-CSCF. The issue is that OpenSBC is not re-translating the contact address (to what UE sent in the request) in the REGISTER response which it sends to UE. Has anyone used OpenSBC with FOKUS OpenIMS? Can anyone point out the =20 issue here? Query2: UE-----P-CSCF-----I/CSCF----S/CSCF-----OpenSBC------OtherDomain Here how to configure OpenSBC to remove P-Asserted-Identity from the =20 INVITE message before it forwards the message to OtherDomain when call =20 comes in with the Privacy header. Regards, Gaurav Kansal |
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-06-19 12:08:59
|
tomach wrote: > Hi! > > Really thansk a lot for a help!!! > > So till now everythign seems to work ok :). I just have to additoinal questions: > > 1. How often should i call initializeSIP(). What this function is doing? > Every time you change any property of the softphone. > 2. If and how ATLSIP supports LDAP? Does it support open LDAP? > No. LDAP is not implemented in ATLSIP. |
From: tomach <to...@dg...> - 2007-06-19 11:51:16
|
Hi! Really thansk a lot for a help!!! So till now everythign seems to work ok :). I just have to additoinal questions: 1. How often should i call initializeSIP(). What this function is doing? 2. If and how ATLSIP supports LDAP? Does it support open LDAP? |
From: Ilian J. C. P. <ip...@so...> - 2007-06-19 10:26:07
|
Hi, tomach wrote: > Ok, I am just trying everything as you said. > > Should I build debug version after release or release version is the most stable and totaly enough? > Debug version is only needed when you need debug the program. So you may not need it. The release version has no debug info. You'll notice that the release version is usually smaller in size. I just told you to rebuild using release version so that the project can be configured properly (as others have pointed out in this forum). Regards, Ilian > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
From: tomach <to...@dg...> - 2007-06-19 10:10:48
|
Ok, I am just trying everything as you said. Should I build debug version after release or release version is the most stable and totaly enough? |
From: Ilian J. C. P. <ip...@so...> - 2007-06-19 09:24:06
|
Hi, tomach wrote: > Hello! > > 1. I would like to ask what is P_SAPI for? Even I compiled ATL I recieved many warnings. is it dangerous? > P_SAPI is for text-to-speech capabilities. ATLSIP does not need this. Warnings like: "warning LNK4221: no public symbols found; archive member will be inaccessible?" No. You need not worry. > 2. I would also ask for G729. I found out that I have to download G729 from http://www.acelp.net/openinit_g729.php and copied it to opensipstack/external/codecs/. I did so but when I compiled it and then run ossphone there wasnt option like g.729 :( What should i change? > Try renaming the files to va_g729a.h and va_g729a.lib and put them in /opensipstack/external/codecs and then do a rebuild (release build first). > 3. Last thing is that when I use ossPhone I noticed that very often like in 90% when i run phone I can not change codec(it always uses gsm 6.10) even i change it on graphical interface, its still gsm 6.10(I checked it on ethereal...that rtp is all the time gsm 6.10... > Hmmm. I see your problem. I'll review this later. Regards, Ilian > Please help me if you can... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
From: tomach <to...@dg...> - 2007-06-19 08:52:05
|
Hello! 1. I would like to ask what is P_SAPI for? Even I compiled ATL I recieved many warnings. is it dangerous? 2. I would also ask for G729. I found out that I have to download G729 from http://www.acelp.net/openinit_g729.php and copied it to opensipstack/external/codecs/. I did so but when I compiled it and then run ossphone there wasnt option like g.729 :( What should i change? 3. Last thing is that when I use ossPhone I noticed that very often like in 90% when i run phone I can not change codec(it always uses gsm 6.10) even i change it on graphical interface, its still gsm 6.10(I checked it on ethereal...that rtp is all the time gsm 6.10... Please help me if you can... |
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-06-18 16:46:27
|
tomach wrote: > Sorry but I guess I do not understand one thing. <br />Ater I download whole CVS. I search for ptbuildopts.h. But there isnt any. There is only ptbuildsopt.h.in and in this file isnt deifned P_SAPI????<br />File ptbuildsopt.h is created during compilation so how can I undefine it? When before compilation there is no such a file?<br />I have no idea how I compiled it two days ago, but now after downloading it from cvs it is not working:( have you changed repository??<br /> > > ptbuildopts.h is automatically generated by the build process. You can do one of two things. 1. Stop the build process just after you see that the first .cxx/.cpp file has started compiling (By this time ptbuildopts would have been generated). You can then undef P_SAPI from ptbuiltopts.h and rebuild. The problem with this approach is that every time you perform a "clean", ptbuildopts.h will be deleted and you need to start the process allover. 2. Delete the following line in "ossbuilopts.h.in" to permanently disable P_SAPI ///////////////////////////////////////////////// // // SAPI speech API (Windows only) // #undef P_SAPI #if defined(_MSC_VER) && P_SAPI #pragma include_alias(<sphelper.h>, <@SAPI_DIR@/include/sphelper.h>) #pragma include_alias(<sapi.h>, <@SAPI_DIR@/include/sapi.h>) #pragma include_alias(<sapiddk.h>, <@SAPI_DIR@/include/sapiddk.h>) #pragma include_alias(<SPError.h>, <@SAPI_DIR@/include/SPError.h>) #pragma include_alias(<SPDebug.h>, <@SAPI_DIR@/include/SPDebug.h>) #define P_SAPI_LIBRARY "@SAPI_DIR@/Lib/i386/sapi.lib" #endif |
From: tomach <to...@dg...> - 2007-06-18 13:57:17
|
Sorry but I guess I do not understand one thing. <br />Ater I download whole CVS. I search for ptbuildopts.h. But there isnt any. There is only ptbuildsopt.h.in and in this file isnt deifned P_SAPI????<br />File ptbuildsopt.h is created during compilation so how can I undefine it? When before compilation there is no such a file?<br />I have no idea how I compiled it two days ago, but now after downloading it from cvs it is not working:( have you changed repository??<br /> |
From: Administrator <rn...@so...> - 2007-06-18 09:28:21
|
Speech API is only needed by the IVR portion of the code and hsould never affect ATLSIP functionality in any way<br /><br />Joegen<br /> |
From: Ilian J. C. P. <ip...@so...> - 2007-06-18 08:20:22
|
Hi, What program did you try to run? Or do you have your own custom program that accesses ATLSIP? Can I see your logs? Regards, Ilian tomach wrote: > I undefined P_SAPI as You adviced. Process of compilation went good. But now everytime I want to build softphone based on activex it does not work at all...I just try to make call and nothing happends...nothing at all....have no idae why? maybe this P_SAPI was important finally?<br /> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
From: tomach <to...@dg...> - 2007-06-18 08:08:04
|
I undefined P_SAPI as You adviced. Process of compilation went good. But now everytime I want to build softphone based on activex it does not work at all...I just try to make call and nothing happends...nothing at all....have no idae why? maybe this P_SAPI was important finally?<br /> |
From: tomach <to...@dg...> - 2007-06-18 08:04:55
|
I do not have windows Vista. I just have normal update to winxp sp2. .Net framework 3.0. Unfortunately I can not uninstall it right now :(.<br /> |
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-06-18 07:21:45
|
Hi Everyone, I am about to post the following in both opensourcesip.org and opensipstack.org web sites. Please give your comments and suggestions/wishes that you need included in the road map. Thanks! Joegen ------------------------------------ OpenSBC Road MAP Version 1.4 (July 15, 2007) - First Stable Release - Full support of attended call transfer - Dialog Events - English User Manual Version 1.5 (August 30, 2007) - 3PCC - IVR Support - VXML Support over IVR - Embedded Scripting Support over IVR - MWI Version 1.6 (September 30, 2007) - TCP/TLS support - PRACK - NAPTR - Diameter Support Version 1.7 (October 30, 2007) - SRTP - SigComp |
From: Joegen E. B. <jb...@so...> - 2007-06-18 06:44:20
|
<blockquote> <blockquote> Are there any plans on the roadmap to make a high availability version of OpenSBC so that in the event of a failure of one box calls do not drop? This is most critical when the sbc is forced to route audio as a failure of the sbc would result in the call dropping.Thanks!<br /> </blockquote></blockquote><br />I'm not sure if this is even doable. To traverse NAT, the SBC needs to be in the middle of the media path. How do you suggest media continuity in a case where the SBC suddenly gets out of the loop? I am open to suggestion and very much willing to incorporate if there is any possible solution.<br /><br />Joegen<br /> |