opensipstack-devel Mailing List for OpenSIPStack (Page 32)
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
Menu
▾
▴
opensipstack-devel
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(67) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(93) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(76) |
May
(114) |
Jun
(133) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(180) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(109) |
Dec
(92) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(83) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(72) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(80) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(67) |
May
|
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Ilian J. C. P. <ip...@so...> - 2008-01-04 05:49:55
|
Hi, Giuseppe Battaglia wrote: > I confirm that Atlsip.dll is the release build. > I unsuccessfully included the suggested dll, even if Visual Studio warn that > most of them are under Windows System file protection (on XP are already in > the system). > If the DLLs are included in the detected dependencies of your setup project, there is no need to manually add them. You can even exclude them if the warning is displayed. > In CVS I found the OssPhoneSetup.vdproj, but the needed files are missing. > May be uploaded the full project? > What files does it say are missing? My copy is ok. Also, how are you registering ATLSIP.dll or why are you manually calling regsvr32? Anyway, try these: 1. When adding ATLSIP.dll to your app's working directory, be sure to set Register == vsdrpCOM in its properties. 2. Add the appropriate merge modules to your setup project: Microsoft_VC80_*.msm. Regards, Ilian > Thank you very much, > Giuseppe Battaglia > > -----Original Message----- > From: ope...@li... > [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of Andre > Silo > Sent: giovedì 3 gennaio 2008 4:04 > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP setup > > Try Including the following: > dnsapi.dll > comdlg32.dll > mpr.dll > snmpapi.dll > setupapi.dll > > "Ilian Jeri C. Pinzon" <ip...@so...> wrote: > Hi, > > Can you confirm that the Atlsip.dll you built is of Release build? The > dependencies you included are for Release build. > > Regards, > Ilian > > Giuseppe Battaglia wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm trying to create a setup for an application that use ATLSIP control, >> > but > >> I can't register Atlsip.dll on a client. >> Regsvr32 say: "this application failed to start because the application >> configuration is incorrect...". >> I'm sure to have included all the dependencies (msvcp80.dll and >> > msvcr80.dll, > >> the others dll are already in the operating system). >> The registration is ok if I install the OssPhone, but I don't need it. I >> > use > >> Windows XP and compile with Visual Studio 2005. >> Any Idea? >> Thank you very much, >> Giuseppe Battaglia >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
|
From: Ilian J. C. P. <ip...@so...> - 2008-01-04 05:38:59
|
Hi Sebastian,
sebastian pastor wrote:
> Hi Ilian,
>
> Tanks. I've done that but i still have the same problem.
> Which are the files that need to be included in OSSPhone folder to be able
> to use ATLSIP library?
>
ATLSIPLib.dll
AxATLSIPLib.dll and
ATLSIP.dll registered via regsvr32
> And what are that "Ax" prefix, i didn't find that namespace anywhere in
> ATLSIP project, i suppose it's automtically generated by Visual studio.
>
It's automatically generated when using an ActiveX control.
> Sorry for being so inquisitive, but i need to do some things based on your
> code for academic purpose, not professional and i know what to do, i'm keen
> on SIP and not so bad on programming but i'm so green on Visual Studio and
> dinamic libraries...
>
> BTW, which are the differences between ATLSIP.dll,
This is the output from the ATLSIP project. Done in ActiveX/C++
(unmanaged code).
> ATLSIPLib.dll and
> Interop.ATLSIPLib.dll?
>
These are wrapper DLLs for ATLSIP. These are needed so that OSSPhone
.NET (C++/CLI managed code) can use ATLSIP (C++ unmanaged code).
I think I know your problem now. Remember when you removed the
"aximp.exe" Pre-build event?
----------
But i still have the same error when compiling OSSPhone project,
PRJ0019: A tool returned an error code from "Executing event previous to
generation..."
--------------
That caused it. If the pre-build event still does not work for you, you
can do this manually:
1. Compile the ATLSIP project *only*.
2. Run aximp ATLSIP.dll
3. Copy the output files to your project directory ("OSSPhone\vc80") and
your output directories ("OSSPhone\vc80\Debug" or "OSSPhone\vc80\Release")
4. Compile OSSPhone .NET
Regards,
Ilian
> Regards,
>
> -Sebastian Pastor-
>
>
> 2008/1/3, Ilian Jeri C. Pinzon <ip...@so...>:
>
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply. I was out on vacation...
>>
>> sebastian pastor wrote:
>>
>>> OK, i'd like to know it because i'm trying to modify something in ATLSIP
>>>
>> but
>>
>>> i cannot then use it in OSSPhone.
>>>
>>> I.e: I added an *empty funtion* just for testing. First in
>>>
>> OpenSipStackctl.h,
>>
>>> then in OpenSipStackCtl.cpp, then in ATLSIP.idl (contained in IDispatch
>>> wrapping for IOpenSipStackCtl inteface) and it is built ok (both release
>>>
>> and
>>
>>> debug).
>>> But then whenever i try to build OpenOSSPhone calling to that function
>>>
>> in
>>
>>> Form1.h it tells me that is not a function belonging to ATLSIP library.
>>>
>>>
>> This could be mean that the updated DLL was not registered. Try manually
>> forcing this by:
>>
>> 1. In VS 2005, go to Tools -> ActiveX Control Test Container...
>> 2. Select Files -> Register Controls
>> 3. Select ATLSIP, then choose Unregister.
>> 4. Click Register then choose your ATLSIP.dll build.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ilian
>>
>>> What am i doing wrong?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2007/12/30, Joegen E. Baclor <joe...@gm...>:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Ilian or a member of his team should be able to answer you more
>>>>
>> reliably
>>
>>>> as to which object files are needed. I have detached myself from
>>>>
>> ATLSIP
>>
>>>> for a long time and currently do not have the build environment to look
>>>> at. I'll leave the liberty of answering to Ilian.
>>>>
>>>> sebastian pastor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Ok. Thanks Joegen.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also thought that way so i disabled that project in Build settings
>>>>>
>> of
>>
>>>>> 'ATLSIP' Solution. But as long as i remember, that way it didn't
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> generate
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> the necessary files for using OSSPhone. Maybe it was my fault, i don't
>>>>> remember wether i chose Build again (from the beginning Ctrl+Alt+F7)
>>>>>
>> or
>>
>>>> just
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> normal Build (F7)...
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, it doesn't matter. Yesterday night after some reattempts and
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> without
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> doing (apparently) anything it worked.
>>>>> BTW, which ones from the files generated after building ATLSIP project
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> are
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> really used by OSSPhone (for the attribute called ATLSIP)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks and Happy New Year,
>>>>>
>>>>> -Sebastián-
>>>>>
>>>>> 2007/12/30, jo...@op... <joe...@gm...>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> hi sebastian,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> atlsipps is not needed by atlsip as far as i know so you may safely
>>>>>> ignore this compile error. that is as long as the atlsip main dll
>>>>>> compiled properly. let me know if you prove me wrong
>>>>>>
>>>>>> joegen
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sebastian pastor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> well this one has appeared with the last version that i downloaded
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> trough
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CVS. I'm using Visual Studio 2005 in Windows XP.
>>>>>>> I don't know if you have reproduced it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> it's in ATLSIPPS project and it says:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Error: MIDL will not generate DLLDATA.C unless you have at least 1
>>>>>>> interface in the main project.*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any workaround?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance and Happy New Year
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Sebastián-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>>>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>>>>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list
>>>>>>> ope...@li...
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>>>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list
>>>>>> ope...@li...
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list
>>>>> ope...@li...
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list
>>>> ope...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list
>>> ope...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>> _______________________________________________
>> opensipstack-devel mailing list
>> ope...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
>>
>>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> opensipstack-devel mailing list
> ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
>
>
>
|
|
From: Giuseppe B. <giu...@bs...> - 2008-01-03 15:20:00
|
I confirm that Atlsip.dll is the release build. I unsuccessfully included the suggested dll, even if Visual Studio warn = that most of them are under Windows System file protection (on XP are already = in the system). In CVS I found the OssPhoneSetup.vdproj, but the needed files are = missing. May be uploaded the full project? Thank you very much, Giuseppe Battaglia -----Original Message----- From: ope...@li... [mailto:ope...@li...] On Behalf Of = Andre Silo Sent: gioved=EC 3 gennaio 2008 4:04 To: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] ATLSIP setup Try Including the following: dnsapi.dll comdlg32.dll mpr.dll snmpapi.dll setupapi.dll "Ilian Jeri C. Pinzon" <ip...@so...> wrote: Hi, Can you confirm that the Atlsip.dll you built is of Release build? The=20 dependencies you included are for Release build. Regards, Ilian Giuseppe Battaglia wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to create a setup for an application that use ATLSIP = control, but > I can't register Atlsip.dll on a client. > Regsvr32 say: "this application failed to start because the = application > configuration is incorrect...". > I'm sure to have included all the dependencies (msvcp80.dll and msvcr80.dll, > the others dll are already in the operating system). > The registration is ok if I install the OssPhone, but I don't need it. = I use > Windows XP and compile with Visual Studio 2005. > Any Idea? > Thank you very much, > Giuseppe Battaglia |
|
From: sebastian p. <seb...@gm...> - 2008-01-03 13:52:50
|
Hi Ilian,
Tanks. I've done that but i still have the same problem.
Which are the files that need to be included in OSSPhone folder to be able
to use ATLSIP library?
And what are that "Ax" prefix, i didn't find that namespace anywhere in
ATLSIP project, i suppose it's automtically generated by Visual studio.
Sorry for being so inquisitive, but i need to do some things based on your
code for academic purpose, not professional and i know what to do, i'm keen
on SIP and not so bad on programming but i'm so green on Visual Studio and
dinamic libraries...
BTW, which are the differences between ATLSIP.dll, ATLSIPLib.dll and
Interop.ATLSIPLib.dll?
Regards,
-Sebastian Pastor-
2008/1/3, Ilian Jeri C. Pinzon <ip...@so...>:
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Sorry for the late reply. I was out on vacation...
>
> sebastian pastor wrote:
> > OK, i'd like to know it because i'm trying to modify something in ATLSI=
P
> but
> > i cannot then use it in OSSPhone.
> >
> > I.e: I added an *empty funtion* just for testing. First in
> OpenSipStackctl.h,
> > then in OpenSipStackCtl.cpp, then in ATLSIP.idl (contained in IDispatch
> > wrapping for IOpenSipStackCtl inteface) and it is built ok (both releas=
e
> and
> > debug).
> > But then whenever i try to build OpenOSSPhone calling to that function
> in
> > Form1.h it tells me that is not a function belonging to ATLSIP library.
> >
> This could be mean that the updated DLL was not registered. Try manually
> forcing this by:
>
> 1. In VS 2005, go to Tools -> ActiveX Control Test Container...
> 2. Select Files -> Register Controls
> 3. Select ATLSIP, then choose Unregister.
> 4. Click Register then choose your ATLSIP.dll build.
>
> Regards,
> Ilian
> > What am i doing wrong?
> >
> >
> >
> > 2007/12/30, Joegen E. Baclor <joe...@gm...>:
> >
> >> Ilian or a member of his team should be able to answer you more
> reliably
> >> as to which object files are needed. I have detached myself from
> ATLSIP
> >> for a long time and currently do not have the build environment to loo=
k
> >> at. I'll leave the liberty of answering to Ilian.
> >>
> >> sebastian pastor wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ok. Thanks Joegen.
> >>>
> >>> I also thought that way so i disabled that project in Build settings
> of
> >>> 'ATLSIP' Solution. But as long as i remember, that way it didn't
> >>>
> >> generate
> >>
> >>> the necessary files for using OSSPhone. Maybe it was my fault, i don'=
t
> >>> remember wether i chose Build again (from the beginning Ctrl+Alt+F7)
> or
> >>>
> >> just
> >>
> >>> normal Build (F7)...
> >>>
> >>> Anyway, it doesn't matter. Yesterday night after some reattempts and
> >>>
> >> without
> >>
> >>> doing (apparently) anything it worked.
> >>> BTW, which ones from the files generated after building ATLSIP projec=
t
> >>>
> >> are
> >>
> >>> really used by OSSPhone (for the attribute called ATLSIP)?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks and Happy New Year,
> >>>
> >>> -Sebasti=E1n-
> >>>
> >>> 2007/12/30, jo...@op... <joe...@gm...>:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> hi sebastian,
> >>>>
> >>>> atlsipps is not needed by atlsip as far as i know so you may safely
> >>>> ignore this compile error. that is as long as the atlsip main dll
> >>>> compiled properly. let me know if you prove me wrong
> >>>>
> >>>> joegen
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> sebastian pastor wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> well this one has appeared with the last version that i downloaded
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> trough
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> CVS. I'm using Visual Studio 2005 in Windows XP.
> >>>>> I don't know if you have reproduced it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> it's in ATLSIPPS project and it says:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *Error: MIDL will not generate DLLDATA.C unless you have at least 1
> >>>>> interface in the main project.*
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any workaround?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks in advance and Happy New Year
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Sebasti=E1n-
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> >>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> >>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list
> >>>>> ope...@li...
> >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list
> >>>> ope...@li...
> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list
> >>> ope...@li...
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> opensipstack-devel mailing list
> >> ope...@li...
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
> >>
> >>
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > opensipstack-devel mailing list
> > ope...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> opensipstack-devel mailing list
> ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
>
|
|
From: Andre S. <eds...@ya...> - 2008-01-03 03:07:13
|
Sebastian, You could also try double click on ATLSIP.DLL and will ask for application to run for it. Choose at C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\regsvr32.exe "Ilian Jeri C. Pinzon" <ip...@so...> wrote: Hi Sebastian, Sorry for the late reply. I was out on vacation... sebastian pastor wrote: > OK, i'd like to know it because i'm trying to modify something in ATLSIP but > i cannot then use it in OSSPhone. > > I.e: I added an *empty funtion* just for testing. First in OpenSipStackctl.h, > then in OpenSipStackCtl.cpp, then in ATLSIP.idl (contained in IDispatch > wrapping for IOpenSipStackCtl inteface) and it is built ok (both release and > debug). > But then whenever i try to build OpenOSSPhone calling to that function in > Form1.h it tells me that is not a function belonging to ATLSIP library. > This could be mean that the updated DLL was not registered. Try manually forcing this by: 1. In VS 2005, go to Tools -> ActiveX Control Test Container... 2. Select Files -> Register Controls 3. Select ATLSIP, then choose Unregister. 4. Click Register then choose your ATLSIP.dll build. Regards, Ilian > What am i doing wrong? > > > > 2007/12/30, Joegen E. Baclor : > >> Ilian or a member of his team should be able to answer you more reliably >> as to which object files are needed. I have detached myself from ATLSIP >> for a long time and currently do not have the build environment to look >> at. I'll leave the liberty of answering to Ilian. >> >> sebastian pastor wrote: >> >>> Ok. Thanks Joegen. >>> >>> I also thought that way so i disabled that project in Build settings of >>> 'ATLSIP' Solution. But as long as i remember, that way it didn't >>> >> generate >> >>> the necessary files for using OSSPhone. Maybe it was my fault, i don't >>> remember wether i chose Build again (from the beginning Ctrl+Alt+F7) or >>> >> just >> >>> normal Build (F7)... >>> >>> Anyway, it doesn't matter. Yesterday night after some reattempts and >>> >> without >> >>> doing (apparently) anything it worked. >>> BTW, which ones from the files generated after building ATLSIP project >>> >> are >> >>> really used by OSSPhone (for the attribute called ATLSIP)? >>> >>> Thanks and Happy New Year, >>> >>> -Sebastián- >>> >>> 2007/12/30, jo...@op... : >>> >>> >>>> hi sebastian, >>>> >>>> atlsipps is not needed by atlsip as far as i know so you may safely >>>> ignore this compile error. that is as long as the atlsip main dll >>>> compiled properly. let me know if you prove me wrong >>>> >>>> joegen >>>> >>>> >>>> sebastian pastor wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> well this one has appeared with the last version that i downloaded >>>>> >>>>> >>>> trough >>>> >>>> >>>>> CVS. I'm using Visual Studio 2005 in Windows XP. >>>>> I don't know if you have reproduced it. >>>>> >>>>> it's in ATLSIPPS project and it says: >>>>> >>>>> *Error: MIDL will not generate DLLDATA.C unless you have at least 1 >>>>> interface in the main project.* >>>>> >>>>> Any workaround? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance and Happy New Year >>>>> >>>>> -Sebastián- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>> ope...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> >>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel --------------------------------- Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. |
|
From: Andre S. <eds...@ya...> - 2008-01-03 03:03:53
|
Try Including the following: dnsapi.dll comdlg32.dll mpr.dll snmpapi.dll setupapi.dll "Ilian Jeri C. Pinzon" <ip...@so...> wrote: Hi, Can you confirm that the Atlsip.dll you built is of Release build? The dependencies you included are for Release build. Regards, Ilian Giuseppe Battaglia wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to create a setup for an application that use ATLSIP control, but > I can't register Atlsip.dll on a client. > Regsvr32 say: "this application failed to start because the application > configuration is incorrect...". > I'm sure to have included all the dependencies (msvcp80.dll and msvcr80.dll, > the others dll are already in the operating system). > The registration is ok if I install the OssPhone, but I don't need it. I use > Windows XP and compile with Visual Studio 2005. > Any Idea? > Thank you very much, > Giuseppe Battaglia > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel --------------------------------- Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. |
|
From: Ilian J. C. P. <ip...@so...> - 2008-01-03 02:57:34
|
Hi, Can you confirm that the Atlsip.dll you built is of Release build? The dependencies you included are for Release build. Regards, Ilian Giuseppe Battaglia wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to create a setup for an application that use ATLSIP control, but > I can't register Atlsip.dll on a client. > Regsvr32 say: "this application failed to start because the application > configuration is incorrect...". > I'm sure to have included all the dependencies (msvcp80.dll and msvcr80.dll, > the others dll are already in the operating system). > The registration is ok if I install the OssPhone, but I don't need it. I use > Windows XP and compile with Visual Studio 2005. > Any Idea? > Thank you very much, > Giuseppe Battaglia > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
|
From: Ilian J. C. P. <ip...@so...> - 2008-01-03 02:49:33
|
Hi Sebastian, Sorry for the late reply. I was out on vacation... sebastian pastor wrote: > OK, i'd like to know it because i'm trying to modify something in ATLSIP but > i cannot then use it in OSSPhone. > > I.e: I added an *empty funtion* just for testing. First in OpenSipStackctl.h, > then in OpenSipStackCtl.cpp, then in ATLSIP.idl (contained in IDispatch > wrapping for IOpenSipStackCtl inteface) and it is built ok (both release and > debug). > But then whenever i try to build OpenOSSPhone calling to that function in > Form1.h it tells me that is not a function belonging to ATLSIP library. > This could be mean that the updated DLL was not registered. Try manually forcing this by: 1. In VS 2005, go to Tools -> ActiveX Control Test Container... 2. Select Files -> Register Controls 3. Select ATLSIP, then choose Unregister. 4. Click Register then choose your ATLSIP.dll build. Regards, Ilian > What am i doing wrong? > > > > 2007/12/30, Joegen E. Baclor <joe...@gm...>: > >> Ilian or a member of his team should be able to answer you more reliably >> as to which object files are needed. I have detached myself from ATLSIP >> for a long time and currently do not have the build environment to look >> at. I'll leave the liberty of answering to Ilian. >> >> sebastian pastor wrote: >> >>> Ok. Thanks Joegen. >>> >>> I also thought that way so i disabled that project in Build settings of >>> 'ATLSIP' Solution. But as long as i remember, that way it didn't >>> >> generate >> >>> the necessary files for using OSSPhone. Maybe it was my fault, i don't >>> remember wether i chose Build again (from the beginning Ctrl+Alt+F7) or >>> >> just >> >>> normal Build (F7)... >>> >>> Anyway, it doesn't matter. Yesterday night after some reattempts and >>> >> without >> >>> doing (apparently) anything it worked. >>> BTW, which ones from the files generated after building ATLSIP project >>> >> are >> >>> really used by OSSPhone (for the attribute called ATLSIP)? >>> >>> Thanks and Happy New Year, >>> >>> -Sebastián- >>> >>> 2007/12/30, jo...@op... <joe...@gm...>: >>> >>> >>>> hi sebastian, >>>> >>>> atlsipps is not needed by atlsip as far as i know so you may safely >>>> ignore this compile error. that is as long as the atlsip main dll >>>> compiled properly. let me know if you prove me wrong >>>> >>>> joegen >>>> >>>> >>>> sebastian pastor wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> well this one has appeared with the last version that i downloaded >>>>> >>>>> >>>> trough >>>> >>>> >>>>> CVS. I'm using Visual Studio 2005 in Windows XP. >>>>> I don't know if you have reproduced it. >>>>> >>>>> it's in ATLSIPPS project and it says: >>>>> >>>>> *Error: MIDL will not generate DLLDATA.C unless you have at least 1 >>>>> interface in the main project.* >>>>> >>>>> Any workaround? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance and Happy New Year >>>>> >>>>> -Sebastián- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>>> ope...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>>> ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>>> >>>> >>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
|
From: Giuseppe B. <giu...@bs...> - 2008-01-02 14:49:08
|
Hi, I'm trying to create a setup for an application that use ATLSIP control, but I can't register Atlsip.dll on a client. Regsvr32 say: "this application failed to start because the application configuration is incorrect...". I'm sure to have included all the dependencies (msvcp80.dll and msvcr80.dll, the others dll are already in the operating system). The registration is ok if I install the OssPhone, but I don't need it. I use Windows XP and compile with Visual Studio 2005. Any Idea? Thank you very much, Giuseppe Battaglia |
|
From: sebastian p. <seb...@gm...> - 2007-12-31 08:07:37
|
OK, i'd like to know it because i'm trying to modify something in ATLSIP bu= t i cannot then use it in OSSPhone. I.e: I added an *empty funtion* just for testing. First in OpenSipStackctl.= h, then in OpenSipStackCtl.cpp, then in ATLSIP.idl (contained in IDispatch wrapping for IOpenSipStackCtl inteface) and it is built ok (both release an= d debug). But then whenever i try to build OpenOSSPhone calling to that function in Form1.h it tells me that is not a function belonging to ATLSIP library. What am i doing wrong? 2007/12/30, Joegen E. Baclor <joe...@gm...>: > > Ilian or a member of his team should be able to answer you more reliably > as to which object files are needed. I have detached myself from ATLSIP > for a long time and currently do not have the build environment to look > at. I'll leave the liberty of answering to Ilian. > > sebastian pastor wrote: > > Ok. Thanks Joegen. > > > > I also thought that way so i disabled that project in Build settings of > > 'ATLSIP' Solution. But as long as i remember, that way it didn't > generate > > the necessary files for using OSSPhone. Maybe it was my fault, i don't > > remember wether i chose Build again (from the beginning Ctrl+Alt+F7) or > just > > normal Build (F7)... > > > > Anyway, it doesn't matter. Yesterday night after some reattempts and > without > > doing (apparently) anything it worked. > > BTW, which ones from the files generated after building ATLSIP project > are > > really used by OSSPhone (for the attribute called ATLSIP)? > > > > Thanks and Happy New Year, > > > > -Sebasti=E1n- > > > > 2007/12/30, jo...@op... <joe...@gm...>: > > > >> hi sebastian, > >> > >> atlsipps is not needed by atlsip as far as i know so you may safely > >> ignore this compile error. that is as long as the atlsip main dll > >> compiled properly. let me know if you prove me wrong > >> > >> joegen > >> > >> > >> sebastian pastor wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> well this one has appeared with the last version that i downloaded > >>> > >> trough > >> > >>> CVS. I'm using Visual Studio 2005 in Windows XP. > >>> I don't know if you have reproduced it. > >>> > >>> it's in ATLSIPPS project and it says: > >>> > >>> *Error: MIDL will not generate DLLDATA.C unless you have at least 1 > >>> interface in the main project.* > >>> > >>> Any workaround? > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks in advance and Happy New Year > >>> > >>> -Sebasti=E1n- > >>> > >>> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list > >>> ope...@li... > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> opensipstack-devel mailing list > >> ope...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > >> > >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > opensipstack-devel mailing list > > ope...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-12-31 05:16:14
|
voice wrote: > I have long contended that sipFoundry.org and openSipStack.org are > open source in ~NAME ONLY~ > > Both *.org have a vested interest in maintaining control growth and > direction of both development endeavors/forums because they both have > a commercial product that competes with many of the goal and interest > of their collective list memberships interests. > In behalf of Solegy (Sponsor of OpenSBC), and as a co-founder of the OpenSBC project, allow me to clarify that OpenSIPStack and OpenSBC are both licensed under a pure MPL/GPL/LGPL tripple license. There is currently no effective commercial license for OpenSBC nor are there plans to have one in the near future. I am not saying this is a permanent situation. We may or may not go "double breasted" (borrowing Dale's words). We are developing OpenSBC to satisfy our own internal needs and the needs of our customers. Having OpenSBC in open source does not give us any direct commercial advantage nor does it give any to our clients. However, our open source initiative allows us to get the help of the community in terms of identifying needed features to further enhance our applications. It is, therefore, to our best interest to keep OpenSBC as part of Solegy's open source initiative. For all you know, we might just have a good heart and sharing the code was an irreducible primary. > All of the problems address by list members have been solved with each > respective sponsors commercial product. There might be commercial functionalities in our internal application that are not part of the open source release but I assure you that the base of our internal application is exactly the same thing one can download from the SourceForge CVS. > > It is time for these open sources to be taken over by other > disinterested non-commercial third parties that could be interested in > creating their own commercial product. After all think, who are the > list membership members. Both of these *.org should immediately > publish their source code just like LINUX. Then they can created > their own commercial product HOOKs like RedHat etc.... > > openSBC publishes the source code, it's C++ and XML. It's nuts to > think of SIP or ipPBX without addressing SBC directly. Every > contribution to the list are incorporated into the respective > commercial products. I would love to be in a position to have the > strongest mind on earth working on my commercial product at no cost. > Wouldn't you? > > sipX or some subgroup should immediately creating and incorporating > openSBC into sipXecs and add it two (2) sipX's Gateway menu right > under SIP TRUNK one called Peering Edge(sbc) the other called Access > Edge(sbc) > > Are there any of you old Hackers out there still alive. openSBC > source code is available for download and it works. 100% RFC > compliant.. Both of these commercial sponsor can pull this open > source code and make it private any time. Think.... Long live the > Revolution.... Laughing as i write it. We also use sipX/OpenSBC pairing in some of our deployments so I understand your frustration why we simply can't glue these two applications as a homogeneous whole. The truth is, well... we can. However, a developers time is not free and if it is not to both projects best commercial interest to support such endeavor, then it would have to be suspended until a need arises that justifies the cost of development. You are always free do it yourself. Fund the development and hire developers to do it and give it back to the community so everyone benefits. If you are lucky, you may even find developers who will do it for free (just doing good to all men). But I assure you this is a rare occasion. Joegen |
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-30 20:04:16
|
Hi ehernaiz We experimennted all night and this is the last one we tried but failed. Please take a look and point out the mistake? This is your recommendation for outbound call to the PSTN: UA -> Access OSBC -> SIPX -> Peering OSBC -> ITSP We are using the same two OSBC as for inbound calls. This first half seems to work fine UA -> Access OSBC -> SIPX In the SipX we created a thrid Gateway (SIP TRUNK) set a sip prefix of 999, point the the Peering ipaddr and the ITSP's SBC. in the B2Bua we set [sip:999*] sip:x.x.x.241;ip-trunk=true ==> ITSP. **** Our ITSP required only that the DID@Peering-ipaddr to gain access ***** and in the sip-trunk we set >>> <root> >>> <siptrunk trunk-name="AnyTrunkName" >>> route-set="ITSP-ipaddr" >>> sip-domain="Peering OSBC-ipaddr" ***** This is set to the Peering. Should this be set to our sipXecs Box? ***** >>> expires="10"> >>> <trunk-accounts> >>>> <account user-name="2125551212" >>>> auth-user-name="" >>>> auth-password="" >>>> inbound-route="sip:2125551212@Peering OSBC-ipaddr" >>>> expires="3600" /> >>> </trunk-accounts> >>> >>> <transient-accounts> >>> </transient-accounts> >>> >>> </siptrunk> >>> </root> Warren Kreckler ----- Original Message ----- From: "ehernaez" <ope...@op...> To: <ope...@li...> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 9:58 AM Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] [OpenSBC] Two (2) OSBC on net segment > Hi Warren, > > Here is the call flow that you can use to bridge the 2 OSBC instances: > For an inbound call from PSTN: ITSP -> Peering OSBC -> Access OSBC > -> SIPXFor an outbound cal to the PSTN: UA -> Access OSBC -> SIPX -> Peering > OSBC -> ITSP > *inbound calls must be routed through the access OSBC in order to reach > endpoints that are registered thru the access OSBC > HTH > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > |
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-30 19:39:50
|
Hi ehernaez Using your first example inbound call from PSTN: ITSP -> Peering OSBC -> Access OSBC -> SIPX What mode would you set? What route (b2bua, relay) would you recomend setting on the Peering OSBC to reach the Acceess OSBC or is a matter of Trusted Domain and setting either in not required? Warren Kreckler ----- Original Message ----- From: "ehernaez" <ope...@op...> To: <ope...@li...> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 9:58 AM Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] [OpenSBC] Two (2) OSBC on net segment > Hi Warren, > > Here is the call flow that you can use to bridge the 2 OSBC instances: > For an inbound call from PSTN: ITSP -> Peering OSBC -> Access OSBC > -> SIPXFor an outbound cal to the PSTN: UA -> Access OSBC -> SIPX -> Peering > OSBC -> ITSP > *inbound calls must be routed through the access OSBC in order to reach > endpoints that are registered thru the access OSBC > HTH > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-12-30 15:44:02
|
Ilian or a member of his team should be able to answer you more reliably = as to which object files are needed. I have detached myself from ATLSIP = for a long time and currently do not have the build environment to look=20 at. I'll leave the liberty of answering to Ilian. sebastian pastor wrote: > Ok. Thanks Joegen. > > I also thought that way so i disabled that project in Build settings of= > 'ATLSIP' Solution. But as long as i remember, that way it didn't genera= te > the necessary files for using OSSPhone. Maybe it was my fault, i don't > remember wether i chose Build again (from the beginning Ctrl+Alt+F7) or= just > normal Build (F7)... > > Anyway, it doesn't matter. Yesterday night after some reattempts and wi= thout > doing (apparently) anything it worked. > BTW, which ones from the files generated after building ATLSIP project = are > really used by OSSPhone (for the attribute called ATLSIP)? > > Thanks and Happy New Year, > > -Sebasti=E1n- > > 2007/12/30, jo...@op... <joe...@gm...>: > =20 >> hi sebastian, >> >> atlsipps is not needed by atlsip as far as i know so you may safely >> ignore this compile error. that is as long as the atlsip main dll >> compiled properly. let me know if you prove me wrong >> >> joegen >> >> >> sebastian pastor wrote: >> =20 >>> Hi, >>> >>> well this one has appeared with the last version that i downloaded >>> =20 >> trough >> =20 >>> CVS. I'm using Visual Studio 2005 in Windows XP. >>> I don't know if you have reproduced it. >>> >>> it's in ATLSIPPS project and it says: >>> >>> *Error: MIDL will not generate DLLDATA.C unless you have at least 1 >>> interface in the main project.* >>> >>> Any workaround? >>> >>> >>> Thanks in advance and Happy New Year >>> >>> -Sebasti=E1n- >>> >>> =20 >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------= --- >> =20 >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> =20 >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------= --- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> =20 > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > =20 |
|
From: sebastian p. <seb...@gm...> - 2007-12-30 15:30:43
|
Ok. Thanks Joegen.
I also thought that way so i disabled that project in Build settings of
'ATLSIP' Solution. But as long as i remember, that way it didn't generate
the necessary files for using OSSPhone. Maybe it was my fault, i don't
remember wether i chose Build again (from the beginning Ctrl+Alt+F7) or jus=
t
normal Build (F7)...
Anyway, it doesn't matter. Yesterday night after some reattempts and withou=
t
doing (apparently) anything it worked.
BTW, which ones from the files generated after building ATLSIP project are
really used by OSSPhone (for the attribute called ATLSIP)?
Thanks and Happy New Year,
-Sebasti=E1n-
2007/12/30, jo...@op... <joe...@gm...>:
>
> hi sebastian,
>
> atlsipps is not needed by atlsip as far as i know so you may safely
> ignore this compile error. that is as long as the atlsip main dll
> compiled properly. let me know if you prove me wrong
>
> joegen
>
>
> sebastian pastor wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > well this one has appeared with the last version that i downloaded
> trough
> > CVS. I'm using Visual Studio 2005 in Windows XP.
> > I don't know if you have reproduced it.
> >
> > it's in ATLSIPPS project and it says:
> >
> > *Error: MIDL will not generate DLLDATA.C unless you have at least 1
> > interface in the main project.*
> >
> > Any workaround?
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance and Happy New Year
> >
> > -Sebasti=E1n-
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > opensipstack-devel mailing list
> > ope...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> opensipstack-devel mailing list
> ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
>
|
|
From: <jo...@op...> - 2007-12-30 05:13:21
|
hi sebastian, atlsipps is not needed by atlsip as far as i know so you may safely=20 ignore this compile error. that is as long as the atlsip main dll=20 compiled properly. let me know if you prove me wrong joegen sebastian pastor wrote: > Hi, > > well this one has appeared with the last version that i downloaded trou= gh > CVS. I'm using Visual Studio 2005 in Windows XP. > I don't know if you have reproduced it. > > it's in ATLSIPPS project and it says: > > *Error: MIDL will not generate DLLDATA.C unless you have at least 1 > interface in the main project.* > > Any workaround? > > > Thanks in advance and Happy New Year > > -Sebasti=E1n- > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > > =20 |
|
From: sebastian p. <seb...@gm...> - 2007-12-29 16:54:45
|
Hi,
well this one has appeared with the last version that i downloaded trough
CVS. I'm using Visual Studio 2005 in Windows XP.
I don't know if you have reproduced it.
it's in ATLSIPPS project and it says:
*Error: MIDL will not generate DLLDATA.C unless you have at least 1
interface in the main project.*
Any workaround?
Thanks in advance and Happy New Year
-Sebasti=E1n-
|
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-29 16:35:40
|
Hi ehernaez
ITSP <==> Peering OSBC <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX This requires two (2)
opensbc's
UA <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX <==> Peering OSBC <==> ITSP. This requires
two (2) additional OSBC
For a grand total of four (4) OSBC's. That's 5 servers altogether.
Another way of looking at this is using factoring:
ITSP <==> Peering OSBC <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX
II
II
UA <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX <==>
Peering OSBC <==> ITSP
or this
ITSP <==> Peering OSBC <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX <==> UA <==> Access OSBC
<==> sipX <==> Peering OSBC <==> ITSP
This is beginning to make me laugh out loud. In other words there is no way
of using UPPerRegistration and Relay routes to eliminate 2 of the OSBC's
It's beginning to look like the sipX people should incorporate openSBC as a
SIP TRUNK Gateway for both Peering and Access Edge SBC's. After all openSBC
is 100% RFC compliant. My god 4 OSBC's servers...
Warrem Kreckler.
----- Original Message -----
From: "ehernaez" <ope...@op...>
To: <ope...@li...>
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] [OpenSBC] Two (2) OSBC on net segment
> Hi Warren,
>
> Here is the call flow that you can use to bridge the 2 OSBC instances:
> For an inbound call from PSTN: ITSP -> Peering OSBC -> Access
OSBC
> -> SIPXFor an outbound cal to the PSTN: UA -> Access OSBC ->
SIPX -> Peering
> OSBC -> ITSP
> *inbound calls must be routed through the access OSBC in order to reach
> endpoints that are registered thru the access OSBC
> HTH
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> opensipstack-devel mailing list
> ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
>
|
|
From: ehernaez <ope...@op...> - 2007-12-29 15:58:29
|
Hi Warren, Here is the call flow that you can use to bridge the 2 OSBC instances: For an inbound call from PSTN: ITSP -> Peering OSBC -> Access OSBC -> SIPXFor an outbound cal to the PSTN: UA -> Access OSBC -> SIPX -> Peering OSBC -> ITSP *inbound calls must be routed through the access OSBC in order to reach endpoints that are registered thru the access OSBC HTH |
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-29 14:15:22
|
Hi Joegen xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Here is a re-cap Re: [OpenSBC] Peering Edge or Access Edge SBC's Warren, Yes, you are correct in concluding that you would need two OSBC instances in the scenario you laid out. The instance that you use for SIP trunking to face your ITSP should not be the same instance that you are using for NAT traversal of SIP UAs using upper registration to SIPX. In fact, it may even be necessary for you to have 3 instances of OSBC if you need to support DID providers that do not comply with SIP REFER. As you may know, calls transferred from the SIPX auto-attendant are referred to the relevant UA. Since many ITSP do not honor the REFER message, we have found it necessary to run a dedicated OSBC instance as a media anchor to shield the ITSP from the referred calls. HTH xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx In the above scenario ITSB Peering OSBC(po) <==> sipX <==> Access OSBC(ao). You can think of po as a pipe/bridge/trunk or two hardwired SBC's via the Internet. Without the po active on network I am able to register phones to the ao and accept phone calls but an not able to make phone calls. In this scenario calls to the ao are sent back to the sipX. The solution is to add a second OSBC used as Peering Edge. So now the trick is to setup OSBC as a Peering edge SBC. In my simplistic thinking because the ITSP on the Peering Edge is both looking for a registered phone on inbound calls and looking for From; DID@PeeringEdge to allow sip passage outbound but on the Access side outbound look like this From DID@AccessEdge . SipFoundary list is also tackeling this issue but is un-aware that a second or a third OSBC may be required. If what HTH said is true how do we bridge the OSBC Peering and Access Edges Warren Kreckler ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joegen E. Baclor" <joe...@gm...> To: <ope...@li...> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 7:00 AM Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] [OpenSBC] Two (2) OSBC on net segment > Hi Warren, > > If you mean mirroring of registrations via none signaling means then the > answer is no. Upper registration may let the registration pass but I > seriously doubt this is what you mean. > > Joegen > > sales@ER wrote: > > Hi > > > > Is it possible to pass phone registration from one OSBC through too another > > OSBC. > > > > I am experimenting with two OSBC's on the same network segment with an > > sipXecs in between. One setup as Peering edge and the other as Access edge. > > > > Warren Kreckler > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > opensipstack-devel mailing list > > ope...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-12-29 13:00:21
|
Hi Warren, If you mean mirroring of registrations via none signaling means then the answer is no. Upper registration may let the registration pass but I seriously doubt this is what you mean. Joegen sales@ER wrote: > Hi > > Is it possible to pass phone registration from one OSBC through too another > OSBC. > > I am experimenting with two OSBC's on the same network segment with an > sipXecs in between. One setup as Peering edge and the other as Access edge. > > Warren Kreckler > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > |
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-29 12:49:43
|
Hi Is it possible to pass phone registration from one OSBC through too another OSBC. I am experimenting with two OSBC's on the same network segment with an sipXecs in between. One setup as Peering edge and the other as Access edge. Warren Kreckler |
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-26 16:58:03
|
Hi ehernaez They are a carrier using Sonus box. They make the distinction between Peering and Access SBC. They want to establish a Peer to Peer connection. They defined this arrangement as Carrier to Carrier. These two SBC connection are linked via the Internet and will be use for no other purpose. They have provide us both DID's and access to an unique ipaddr. They expect from us one of those DID's and that unique ipaddr in the From: header when we send sip traffic, which is part of the security they use to identify 9094441024@x.x.x.241 ipaddr/SBC/peer x.x.x.190 <==> DID@x.x.x.241 On our sipX box we have two (2) Sip Trunk Gateways. Each pointing to one of those OSBC box's. One pointing to OSBC, which will be used for Peering edge and the other OBSC used for Access edge,phone registration etc... Warren Kreckler ----- Original Message ----- From: "ehernaez" <ope...@op...> To: <ope...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 7:35 AM Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] [OpenSBC] Sip Trunck Howto > I am having trouble following your example. Could you please post a more specific example of what your ITSP is expecting? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > |
|
From: ehernaez <ope...@op...> - 2007-12-26 13:35:46
|
I am having trouble following your example. Could you please post a more specific example of what your ITSP is expecting? |
|
From: voice <vo...@ne...> - 2007-12-23 17:26:13
|
Hi ehernaez Thank you for the pdf link. My guess is that there are many definitions of What/Who/Where is a Sip Trunk provider and what they expect in terms of param's. I have several Sip Trunk providers. How can i use this form for multi's? And they seem to range from smart to stupid again in terms what they expect and whether if they discard useless param or see the extra stuff as attacks. While seaching for the proper form of the xml i saw deferences in the examples. For instance one contains the <root> </root> brackets others don't. Is the <root> </root> required? One Sip Truck provider uses a peering arrangement. They setup an 'one of a kind port' for us and expect two param's the DID and an ipaddr simliar to an email address. Can i safely remove parameters i don't need and that the ST provider see as junk, unexpected and a threat? r ----- Original Message ----- From: "ehernaez" <ope...@op...> To: <ope...@li...> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 10:20 AM Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] [OpenSBC] Sip Trunck Howto > Please see here: http://www.opensourcesip.org:8080/clearspacex/docs/DOC-1040 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services > for just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel |
18 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
