Re: [OpenSBC] [OpenSIPStack] Two (2) OSBC on net segment
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
|
From: ehernaez <ope...@op...> - 2007-12-29 17:04:36
|
It's definitely not necessary to have 4 OSBC instances. The same OSBC instances can be used for inbound and outbound call scenarios. You just need to be able to distinguish between inbound and outbound calls, which can be done by using a SIPX prefix for outbound calls. 8<----------------------------- Hi ehernaez ITSP <==> Peering OSBC <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX This requires two (2) opensbc's UA <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX <==> Peering OSBC <==> ITSP. This requires two (2) additional OSBC For a grand total of four (4) OSBC's. That's 5 servers altogether. Another way of looking at this is using factoring: ITSP <==> Peering OSBC <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX II II UA <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX <==> Peering OSBC <==> ITSP or this ITSP <==> Peering OSBC <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX <==> UA <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX <==> Peering OSBC <==> ITSP This is beginning to make me laugh out loud. In other words there is no way of using UPPerRegistration and Relay routes to eliminate 2 of the OSBC's It's beginning to look like the sipX people should incorporate openSBC as a SIP TRUNK Gateway for both Peering and Access Edge SBC's. After all openSBC is 100% RFC compliant. My god 4 OSBC's servers... Warrem Kreckler. |