Re: [OpenSIPStack] [OpenSBC] Two (2) OSBC on net segment
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-29 16:35:40
|
Hi ehernaez ITSP <==> Peering OSBC <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX This requires two (2) opensbc's UA <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX <==> Peering OSBC <==> ITSP. This requires two (2) additional OSBC For a grand total of four (4) OSBC's. That's 5 servers altogether. Another way of looking at this is using factoring: ITSP <==> Peering OSBC <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX II II UA <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX <==> Peering OSBC <==> ITSP or this ITSP <==> Peering OSBC <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX <==> UA <==> Access OSBC <==> sipX <==> Peering OSBC <==> ITSP This is beginning to make me laugh out loud. In other words there is no way of using UPPerRegistration and Relay routes to eliminate 2 of the OSBC's It's beginning to look like the sipX people should incorporate openSBC as a SIP TRUNK Gateway for both Peering and Access Edge SBC's. After all openSBC is 100% RFC compliant. My god 4 OSBC's servers... Warrem Kreckler. ----- Original Message ----- From: "ehernaez" <ope...@op...> To: <ope...@li...> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 9:58 AM Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] [OpenSBC] Two (2) OSBC on net segment > Hi Warren, > > Here is the call flow that you can use to bridge the 2 OSBC instances: > For an inbound call from PSTN: ITSP -> Peering OSBC -> Access OSBC > -> SIPXFor an outbound cal to the PSTN: UA -> Access OSBC -> SIPX -> Peering > OSBC -> ITSP > *inbound calls must be routed through the access OSBC in order to reach > endpoints that are registered thru the access OSBC > HTH > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > |