Re: [OpenSIPStack] Server implementation question

[Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...>]

Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
> After looking into it a bit more it seems that B2BUA handles the proxy, registrar, .. stuff that we'd need .. so in your opinion is it worth spending more time looking into using B2BUA classes in favour of SIPStack or is that a more-or-less pointless exercise?
>
> Thanks
>
>   

I do not advise it.  The B2BUA is on top of the food chain.  If you 
decide to change the B2BUA code, it will automatically make it harder 
for you to upgrade to newer releases of OpenSIPStack.   The B2BUA has 
various handlers.   B2B*Interface classes.   These handlers provide 
hooks for application developer to customize the behavior of the B2BUA. 
  If you need new handlers to be exposed, you may vote for such handlers 
to be added but you need to justify why.  I will be happy to add them.