Re: [OpenSBC] opensbc-openimscore interworking - upper registration route setting has no effect?

[Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...>]

What exactly is your setting in the Upper Registration Route?   Make 
sure the To-URI in the REGISTER complies with your filter.  To: 
sip:user@x.x.x.x:5060 for example will not comply with [sip:*@x.x.x.x] 
because of the port in the To-URI.   The above rule should be rewritten 
as [sip:*@x.x.x.x:5060] or  [sip:*@x.x.x.x*]


sui eng wrote:
> Hi,   
>
>
>  I have the following setup for OpenSBC and OpenIMSCore interworking:   
>
>
> UA ----> OpenSBC ----> (pcscf:4060) of OpenIMSCore ----> VCC AS   
>
>
> OpenSBC is configured as B2BUpperReg mode.   
>
>
> Upper Registration Routes is set to IPAddressOfPcscf:4060   
>
>
> When UA registers, the Registration is forwarded from OpenSBC to OpenIMSCore domain but not on the configured P-CSCF port of 4060, it went to well known port 5060 (which is the port for I-CSCF) and I-CSCF responded with the message: "400 Bad Request - P-Visited-Network-ID header missing".   
>
>
> It seems the configuration of Upper Registration Routes has no effect, the Registration is forwarded based on configuration of OpenIMSCore domain and the port forwarded to is well known port of 5060 (not 4060).   
>
>
> Has anyone encountered this? Is there a way to make this work?   
>
>
> Thanks, 
>
>
> sshee
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>
>
>