Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue

[<jo...@op...>]

It's the Callee which does not send a via branch parameter.

Manoj Joshi wrote:
> >From UA do u mean Caller or Callee?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...]
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 2:20 PM
> To: Manoj Joshi
> Cc: ope...@li...
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue
>
>
> Hi Manoj,
>
> The UA is definitely buggy.  It is not sending a via branch parameter
> which is required to match responses with transactions.  200 Ok was
> relayed because of an uncaught condition.  OpenSBC thought it was a 200
> ok retransmission that is why it got promoted to the core layer.  This
> is a bug in OpenSBC that needs to be corrected.  However, this will not
> make the buggy UA work with OpenSBC either.  I suggest you report this
> to the vendor.  One thing peculiar,  the UA does send a via branch in
> 100 Trying.
>
> Joegen
>