Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
Menu
▾
▴
Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue
|
From: Manoj J. <ma...@as...> - 2008-12-22 08:59:08
|
>From UA do u mean Caller or Callee? -----Original Message----- From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 2:20 PM To: Manoj Joshi Cc: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue Hi Manoj, The UA is definitely buggy. It is not sending a via branch parameter which is required to match responses with transactions. 200 Ok was relayed because of an uncaught condition. OpenSBC thought it was a 200 ok retransmission that is why it got promoted to the core layer. This is a bug in OpenSBC that needs to be corrected. However, this will not make the buggy UA work with OpenSBC either. I suggest you report this to the vendor. One thing peculiar, the UA does send a via branch in 100 Trying. Joegen Manoj Joshi wrote: > Hello Joegen, > > I think in this case my PC firewall is creating problem. I am verifying it > by testing from various places. > > I have another problem though...The issue is like following.. > > OSBC does not forward Session progress message to SIP UA. However it > forwards 200 OK message. I checked the logs and found osbc prints following > on receiving session progress... > 2008/12/22 07:24:51.656 DBG: [CID=0x0511] Finding transaction for SIP/2.0 > 183 Session Progress > 2008/12/22 07:24:51.656 PWL: [CID=0x0000] Parser > TransactionId::operator=() - No Branch Paramemter in Via present in message > 2008/12/22 07:24:51.656 DBG: [CID=0x0511] Setting Transaction ID to > s_9608_551d896705cd-0x0001|empty-branch|INVITE|1c18646|22580 > 2008/12/22 07:24:51.656 PWL: [CID=0x0000] Parser > TransactionId::operator=() - No Branch Paramemter in Via present in message > 2008/12/22 07:24:51.656 DBG: [CID=0x0511] Event: Setting UA Core [Call] to > handle event INVITE > 2008/12/22 07:24:51.656 DTL: [CID=0x0511] Event: ---> UnknownTransaction - > INVITE > > I have attached the log. This log will be simple to read as it has only one > call log. > > Please comment. > > Regards, > > Manoj > > -----Original Message----- > From: jo...@op... [mailto:joe...@gm...] > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:48 PM > To: ope...@li... > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue > > > Ok now you are sure that the packets never arrive to your client. Now > run Ethereal in the OpenSBC box and see if ethereal shows the outbound > packets. If Etheareal shows it, then its a network problem. The fact > that some messages arrive and some don't points to a network problem. > Start looking in that direction. As far as the logs go, OpenSBC sends > the responses. I am sure if you snoop the packets traversing OpenSBC > NIC that you will see those packets being sent. It just never arrive to > the destination. There is nothing OpenSBC can do about this. > > > Manoj Joshi wrote: > >> In ethereal i do not see any response to Register requests. UA is sending >> register again because its not getting response. >> >> You can also try to register from ur place to my server...i can even >> > arrange > >> my SIP proxy to comminicate with ur OSBC (on ur machine). >> >> Let me know. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 6:24 PM >> To: Manoj Joshi >> Cc: ope...@li... >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue >> >> >> The log indicates that your UA is retransmitting the REGISTER even if >> OpenSBC alredy sent a 200 OK for the registration. If ethereal shows >> these messages in the wire, then this is a network problem. >> >> Manoj Joshi wrote: >> >> >>> joegen, >>> >>> As per our discussion, i tried to capture the packets on wireshark. To do >>> >>> >> so >> >> >>> i configured UA to disable encryption. But now its not even registering. >>> > I > >>> have attached server logs. On UA side wireshark i do not see any response >>> from server. Please note that everything is same (OSBC and UA config) >>> >>> >> except >> >> >>> now i am not using encryption. >>> >>> Please comment on it. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Manoj >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Manoj Joshi [mailto:ma...@as...] >>> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 1:54 PM >>> To: jb...@so... >>> Cc: ope...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue >>> >>> >>> trying is coming...i will check the ethreal and will let u know. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] >>> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:26 PM >>> To: Manoj Joshi >>> Cc: ope...@li... >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Received response without transaction issue >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> i am getting "Trying" and "Bye" on SIP client >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> I doubt this very much. Based on the log you sent, your UA kept on >>> retransmitting the INVITE. This indicates that 100 Trying never made it >>> to the UA. >>> >>> 2008/12/17 21:49:04.210 INF: [CID=0x0621] <<< INVITE >>> sip:919811618189@216.176.181.108 SIP/2.0 SRC: 122.160.115.219:11765:UDP >>> enc=1 bytes=794 >>> 2008/12/17 21:49:04.726 INF: [CID=0x0621] <<< INVITE >>> sip:919811618189@216.176.181.108 SIP/2.0 SRC: 122.160.115.219:11765:UDP >>> enc=1 bytes=794 >>> 2008/12/17 21:49:05.726 INF: [CID=0x0621] <<< INVITE >>> sip:919811618189@216.176.181.108 SIP/2.0 SRC: 122.160.115.219:11765:UDP >>> enc=1 bytes=794 >>> 2008/12/17 21:49:07.726 INF: [CID=0x0621] <<< INVITE >>> sip:919811618189@216.176.181.108 SIP/2.0 SRC: 122.160.115.219:11765:UDP >>> enc=1 bytes=794 >>> >>> I would be looking how traffic looks in ethereal if I were you. >>> >>> Manoj Joshi wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I had tested it from two places (One behind NAT and other from Public >>>> >>>> >> IP). >> >> >>>> Also i am testing it from the place where SIP is not blocked at all. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Please >>> >>> >>> >>>> note that i am getting "Trying" and "Bye" on SIP client (as these >>>> >>>> >> messages >> >> >>>> are directly from OSBC). But i do not get "Session progress" and "200 >>>> > OK" > >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Manoj >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG. >>> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1854 - Release Date: >>> >>> >> 12/17/2008 >> >> >>> 7:21 PM >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - >>> > - > >> -- >> >> >>> -- >>> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, >>> >>> >> Nevada. >> >> >>> The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help >>> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at >>> >>> >>> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opensipstack-devel mailing list >>> ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >>> >>> >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG. >>> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1854 - Release Date: >>> >>> >> 12/17/2008 >> >> >>> 7:21 PM >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1854 - Release Date: >>> >>> >> 12/17/2008 7:21 PM >> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG. >> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1854 - Release Date: >> > 12/17/2008 > >> 7:21 PM >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - >> > ---- > >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, >> > Nevada. > >> The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help >> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at >> >> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > >> _______________________________________________ >> opensipstack-devel mailing list >> ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1854 - Release Date: >> > 12/17/2008 7:21 PM > >> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > -- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > opensipstack-devel mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1854 - Release Date: 12/17/2008 > 7:21 PM > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1860 - Release Date: 12/21/2008 3:08 PM > > -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1860 - Release Date: 12/21/2008 3:08 PM |
