Re: [OpenSIPStack] OSBC<==> sipX, OSBC listener fails. Error ***Address already in use*****

[Raymund N. <ray...@ya...>]

hi robert,

 in what particular listener in osbc you are having conflict? (main trunk, backdoor, calea, sip trunk?)

can u post a screenshot of the transport status?

thanks

raymund

--- On Fri, 12/19/08, voice <vo...@ne...> wrote:

From: voice <vo...@ne...>
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OSBC<==> sipX,OSBC listener fails. Error ***Address already in use*****
To: ray...@ya...
Cc: jb...@so..., ope...@li...
Date: Friday, December 19, 2008, 10:53 AM

Hi raymund

Please find logs from the latest install.

osbc:5060 and sipX:5060 still conflict. I changed eth0 to private ipaddr and
OSBC to real public ipaddr on a duel Centos5 box.
I set
MY_IP_ADDR to 192.168.10.2 and in config.defs
OSBC set admin param to 69.x.x.200.

As long as i don't run sipX then OSBC see both NICs without error's.

When you post in the Wiki could you also post your resolv.conf.  And if you
are using DHCPD.conf and NAMED.conf please post those as well.  named and
dhcpd have nothing to do with the OSBC problem.  Post will is only for
completeness.

One more curious thing:  On the brower command line if i type only the
ipaddress of the OSBC NIC2 (69.x.x.200), sipX will bind to that ipaddr and
launch sipX web as htts://69.x.x.200:8443 the we admin.  Even when in
config.defs has set My_IP_ADDR is set to the NIC1 private ipaddr of
192.168.10.2.  I'm thinking it should not do this because SSL cert is bound
to fqdn aka sipx.chicagonettelephone.org ==192.168.10.2 in sipX local DNS.

Any ideas?

r



> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Raymund Nones" <ray...@ya...>
> To: "voice" <vo...@ne...>
> Cc: <ope...@li...>
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] OSBC<==> sipX,OSBC listener fails. Error
> ***Address already in use*****
>
>
> hi robert,
>
> inline
>
> When you installed sipX did you do a manual
> install?
>
>
> RDN: what do you mean by manual install? from compile from source? CD?
yum?
> for
> mypart i used yum
>
>
>
> When you said you installed sipX first, which i
> take it to mean also the NIC1?
>
>
> RDN: yes
>
> So that when you
> created the SSL cert you were using the NIC1's network name in the SSL, is
> this
> true?
>
> RDN: for my SSL cert i used the fqdn which is pointed to my first nic
>
>
> Is this why you choose to use real Public IPs on
> both NIC1 and NIC2?
>
> RDN: my test involved 3 scenarios, one of them is both NIC has public IP,
> the other two
> scenarios, sipx is having a private ip and OSBC having a public ip. It
would
> not
> matter, it all depends on your requirement.
>
>
> When using public ip for sipX NIC1 did you still
> use OSBC to register your ip phones'?
>
> RDN: If my UA's are behind NAT, then i would use OSBC for upperreg but if
my
> UA's are
> not behind NAT then i could register them directly to SIPX
>
>
>
> Where you using OSBC between PSTN or ITSP and
> sipX?
>
> RDN: my test convered both, PSTN and ITSP
>
>
> How did you prevent OSBC:5060 from seeing sipX:5060
> when running OSBC?
>
> RDN: 3 questions, can send some logs for us to look? if you are
experiencing
> this, does it affect your setup, interms of inbound and outbound calls? i
> guess you could still have successful calls since sipx already grab that
ip,
> did you try to test?
>
>
>
> I have installed Linux, OSBC and sipX more then 10
> times and i am unable to prevernt OSBC:5060 from conficting with
> sipX:5060. I have set MY_IP_Addre = public ip NIC1sipX and set OSBC
manually
> to NIC2 but still OSBC:5060
> listener conflicts with sipX:5060. How did you resolved this error?
>
> RDN: please see above answer.
>
> I appreciate your work on the scenarios but could you publish the steps
you
> took
> to install both OSBC and sipX, the order in which you installed and both
> config.defs and OSBC Admin Parameter settings.
>
> RDN: i'll be posting it on the wiki this weekend.
>
> hth
>
> raymund
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> --
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas,
Nevada.
> The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
>
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
> _______________________________________________
> opensipstack-devel mailing list
> ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel
>
>