Re: [OpenSIPStack] Question
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
From: Manoj J. <ma...@as...> - 2008-12-02 06:41:03
|
Yes of course...but please give me some guidelines on where should i make changes to?..it would save lot of time. -----Original Message----- From: Joegen E. Baclor [mailto:joe...@gm...] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 9:02 AM To: ope...@li... Cc: jo...@op... Subject: Re: [OpenSIPStack] Question Hmmn. Upper-Reg encryption bridging is currently not in place but i do agree that it needs to be supported. I'll see if a fast hack is in order. Would you be commiting your time to test patches? Manoj Joshi wrote: > Hello Joegen, > > If i use upper registartion route and use encryption also as scenario below. > > SIPClient ---> OpenSBC -----> Other Proxy. > > My registration messages are being forwarded to "Other Proxy" but opensbc is > sending them in encrypted mode. Is there any setting where i can correct > this behavior?..I want messages to pass as .. > > SIPClient (Encryption=True) ------> OpenSBC > (Encryption=True)---------->Other Proxy (Normal SIP Server without > encryption) > > Regards, > > Manoj > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ opensipstack-devel mailing list ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-devel -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.9.12 - Release Date: 11/30/2008 12:00 AM |