Re: [OpenSBC] SipX<=>OpenSBC: inbound route doesn't work

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Hi Vitaly,

The error you are seeing is 

SIP/2.0 500 Maximum Concurrent Connection Reached

is pretty much misleading.  I'll change this in the future.  The real 
meaning of this error for trunk calls is that OpenSBC was not able to 
map an account  to the inbound call.  Based on this error response, the 
domain is not correct.

SIP/2.0 500 Maximum Concurrent Connection Reached
From:  <sip:044...@21...>;tag=ffcc5d70113083cd38912c3472e27a3a
To:  <sip:414...@21...>;tag=44b43a0372b9dd11870fd91503730f87

As you can see, it is sending to 414...@21....  

if you configured your trunk like this

SIP-Trunk-Config=<siptrunk trunk-name="voipgateway.org" 
route-set="voipgateway.org" sip-domain="voipgateway.org" expires="20">

Then the INVITE should be

INVITE sip:41445551800ip.add.of.sbc:5066 SIP/2.0
From:  <sip:044...@vo...>;tag=ffcc5d70113083cd38912c3472e27a3a
To:  <sip:414...@vo...>;tag=44b43a0372b9dd11870fd91503730f87

HTH,

Joegen

OpenSBC Forum wrote:
> Hi, Joegen 
>
>
> I've installed OpenSBC v.1.1.5 RC2 on another server with ext.ip. 
>
>
> When I call from PSTN number 448755540 to number 41445551800 I got the next result
>
>
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.257 ERR: [CID=0x0000] GC: CallSessionManager.cxx:535 CallSessionManager::OnCreateServerSession::CallSession Attempt to CreateReference() a NULL Pointer or none descendant of PObject!!!
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.257 DBG: [CID=0x06cb] *** MESSAGE ARRIVAL *** No Session available to handle INVITE sip:41445001800@my_ext_ip:9006;transport=udp SIP/2.0
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.258 DTL: [CID=0x0bfd] IST(1227626196313)    Event(SIPMessage) - SIP/2.0 500 Maximum Concurrent Connection Reached
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.258 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd] TRANSACTION: (IST) SIP/2.0 500 Maximum Concurrent Connection Reached State: 2
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.258 DTL: [CID=0x0bfd] IST(1227626196313)    StateProceeding-&gt;StateCompleted(SIP/2.0 500 Maximum Concurrent Connection Reached)
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.258 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd] IST(1227626196313)    Timer H( 32000 ms ) STARTED
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.258 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd] IST(1227626196313)    Timer G( 500 ms ) STARTED
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.258 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd] Added ACK Transaction 279DF7A7-BA3B11DD-9734EA9F-DB957415@212.117.200.79~1o44b43a0372b9dd11870fd91503730f87|z9hG4bKc9c4.2b3ee7949af4ab8a4cc33ef47f04bf57.0|ACK
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.259 INF: [CID=0x0bfd] &gt;&gt;&gt; SIP/2.0 500 Maximum Concurrent Connection Reached DST: 212.117.200.148:5060:UDP src=my_ext_ip:9007 enc=0 bytes=608
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.259 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd]
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.259 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd]       SIP/2.0 500 Maximum Concurrent Connection Reached
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.259 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd]       From:  &lt;sip:0448755540@212.117.200.148&gt;;tag=ffcc5d70113083cd38912c3472e27a3a
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.259 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd]       To:  &lt;sip:41445551800@212.117.200.148&gt;;tag=44b43a0372b9dd11870fd91503730f87
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.259 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd]       Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 212.117.200.148;branch=z9hG4bKc9c4.2b3ee7949af4ab8a4cc33ef47f04bf57.0;rport=5060;received=212.117.200.148
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.259 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd]       Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 212.117.200.148:5061;branch=z9hG4bKb14092bed380e45e3f6003f979886bf3;rport=5061
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.259 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd]       CSeq: 200 INVITE
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.259 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd]       Call-ID: 279DF7A7-BA3B11DD-9734EA9F-DB957415@212.117.200.79~1o
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.259 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd]       Record-Route: &lt;sip:212.117.200.148;ftag=ffcc5d70113083cd38912c3472e27a3a;lr&gt;
> 2008/11/25 17:18:42.259 DBG: [CID=0x0bfd]       Content-Length: 0
>
>
> What did I confuse?
>   