On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 14:25 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 12:56 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> > [1] http://www.bortzmeyer.org/7512.html (in french)
>
> Note that the Fedora packaging guidelines mentioned there are purely a
> *proposal*, put forth by myself. It's not part of the official Fedora
> packaging guidelines yet.
Update: it is now, or will be once the Fedora Packaging Committee gets
round to writing up the decision they just made in today's meeting.
If there is any software in Fedora which uses X.509 certificates but
which *doesn't* automatically use the PKCS#11 providers from the
system's p11-kit configuration, and/or which doesn't accept
certificates specified in the form of a RFC7512 PKCS#11 URI, please
file a bug and mark it as blocking the 'PKCS#11 sanity tracker':
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=PKCS11
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
Dav...@in... Intel Corporation
|