From: Juraj Š. <ju...@sa...> - 2025-07-21 12:59:37
|
On Sat, 2025-07-19 at 23:44 +0200, Michał Trojnara via Opensc-devel wrote: > > Who would be author then to give copyright assignment to the > > project and who owns the IP to the LLM generated code? > > I will. Dear Michał I understand you intend to mislead others about code authorship. This might put the project at risk. As if merging LLM-generated garbage were not risky enough... > You could argue the same about any output of non-AI code generators > and/or compilers. I respectfully disagree. I came up with the prompt, > and I retain intellectual property rights to the generated code. A LLM merely transforms code originally written (and therefore copyrighted) by others. To use the output, one needs permission from the original author(s). Which is indeed how output of non-AI code generators & compilers is normally treated. > I myself was trained using code written (and copyrighted) by others. > I tend to reuse good programming patterns I have seen before. We all do that. Programming patterns are not protected by copyright. Code is. Copy-pasting has always been risky. > the legal status of AI-generated code is still under debate The current (rather clear) status means that such code simply cannot be included in OpenSC or indeed in any free software. Best, Juraj |