From: David W. <dw...@in...> - 2016-02-26 17:02:07
|
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 16:30 +0000, Salz, Rich wrote: > This sounds like a great project. But just to make it clear: it's > something for after 1.1. That is, if there's no time to do work > until May, that's okay :) Absolutely. Even if we had instant unanimous agreement on the licensing, and by some magic there was no extra work to be done there to make sure it's all good — and if we had instant unanimous agreement from both the OpenSSL and OpenSC side that dropping libp11 into crypto/pkcs11 *verbatim* was the right thing to do, I don't think I'd be suggesting that we try to get this into 1.1 in the ... 8? ... working days we have left before Beta1. I plan to spend that time chasing the fixes required for the UEFI build :) -- dwmw2 |