|
From: Ludovic R. <lud...@gm...> - 2015-08-24 20:05:30
|
Hello, 2015-08-24 10:55 GMT+02:00 Martin Paljak <ma...@ma...>: > On 24/08/15 11:15, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: >> Hello, >> These two projects had several years to have a release and as it is >> now distributions ship versions of it with various different patches >> applied each, enabling different features each. Fortunately (or not) >> there is popular software depending on engine_pkcs11 (and thus >> libp11), making these two libraries quite important. I've opened [0] >> and [1], but I'm not sure whether there is any developer active on >> these components. If there is, would it be possible to have a release >> on these components? Otherwise, would it make sense to mark these >> projects as obsolete or abandonware so that no new projects start >> depending on them? > > These libraries do get quite little attention and "developer discretion" > might be justified, but eventually developers must make their own > judgements. > > Also, why don't you roll a new release? Whoever uses them for real life > apps is probably the best to answer questions about usability and > releasability. > > (The above should be read that if nobody objects and Nikos is willing, > he should be granted release access to these two projects.) I fully agree. Nikos, do you volunteer as libp11 and engine_pkcs11 maintainer/release manager? Bye -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau |