Re: [Opensc-devel] Allowing socket based IPC for X11 on pam_auth

[Dirk-Willem v. G. <di...@we...>]

> On 23 Apr 2015, at 09:26, Frank Morgner <mo...@in...> wrote:
> 
> Is it necessary to have a non static signature of pam_prompt?

You are right - I guess we could rename this function as not to clash with the PKCS define function of equivalent functionality; and hence avoid the compiler Werror’s.

Dw.