From: Jean-Michel P. - G. <jm...@go...> - 2013-08-26 09:21:33
|
> I think this step is closer to the acceptance of a cookie. > This system is designed to replace passwords, not giving external > parties access to your computer. I agree with you. Also, keep in mind that SKS/KeyGen2 will allow https communications with major US vendors (Facebook, Google, etc ...) like a breeze. All data will end-up in a huge data center in the desert. The advantages of System Officer and local management of PKI is that there is some control of individuals, companies and governments on their own PKI and information flows. We publish our own laws, so why should we give away the right to manage our own PKI? I consider SKS/KeyGen2 as a US Government project. If you are working for free on SKS/KeyGen2, please ask for a salary! From a pure legal point, I don't think this is legal in all countries to manage a PKI in a cloud, situated nowhere, with no control. Google is pushing around with the same moto: "we are not aware of local laws". Just my 2 cents, I will stop there to avoid filling the list. Flame wars are not good for communities. Just do the right thing. Kind regards, -- Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu |