From: Alex S. <ml...@os...> - 2013-08-04 16:54:20
|
Hi, As OpenSC user it is unclear for me why bug 173 was closed without any resolution. From my personal point of view proposed patch was not able to cause any issues for OpenSC users. I am agree that problem is probably with standard compliance, but i don`t understand why OpenSC should drop support of popular hardware because of this reason. E.g. ACPI code in the Linux kernel supports many exceptions or buggy chipsets. I don`t see any benefits that users with similar problems will use third-party patches instead. It would be great if other developers can take a look on this issue. If my patch is done in a wrong way - please recommend how to do it properly, but i think that closing real issue (even if it is caused by wrong windows official driver) is not a good approach. |