From: Viktor T. <vik...@gm...> - 2013-03-10 12:33:30
|
Hello, Le 06/03/2013 08:26, Andreas Schwier (ML) a écrit : > Right now the Wiki is Github is more accurate than the one at OpenSC and > I favour to turn the later of. > > We are losing our user base and our credibility with these kind of > activities. We already turned-off the mailing list without further > notice, leaving a good bunch of infrequent follower behind. Sure, we lost a lot when had migrated wiki from trac to github. As for me, Trac is more friendly and pleasant to use. But, afais, we do not have sufficient of continuous humane resources to maintain the stuff on the dedicated platforms. And so, imho, it's better to loose somewhat in usability, but keep the project independent, as much as possible, of the individual availability/efforts/willing. > Andreas Kind regards, Viktor. > > > Am 05.03.2013 15:24, schrieb Martin Paljak: >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Andreas Schwier >> <and...@ca...> wrote: >>> I'm confused ! >>> >>> So which website (and in particular which wiki) are we going to maintain >>> ? The one at www.opensc-project.org or the one at Github ? >> https://www.opensc-project.org must be updated to reference github >> exclusively for all things source. >> >> Point-blank copying of the wiki to github and removal of it degrades >> at least parts of the content and can't happen. In the end what >> matters is that relevant, correct and up to date information is easily >> available. And that knowledge doesn't create and organize itself. >> >> Martin > |