|
From: Richard B. <tao...@gm...> - 2008-07-13 19:40:12
|
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Christoph P. Mayer <nor...@bl...> Date: Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 2:23 PM Subject: [TaoSecurity] New comment on Packet Anonymization with PktAnon. To: tao...@gm... Christoph P. Mayer has left a new comment on your post "Packet Anonymization with PktAnon": Hi, we, the PktAnon developers, would be very happy to help getting PktAnon into OpenPacket.org! If there is an interest in this, we would like to kick off discussion about mainly three points: 1. What protocols need to be supported? PktAnon supports a wide range of standard protocol. But it needs extensions in higher layer protocols for layer >= 5. Due to the architecture new protocols are quite easy to add. 2. What additional anonymization primitives are needed and how can anonymized traces be verified? 3. Will we find a way to define community standardized anonymization profiles? From our point of view this requires cooperation from network engineers, researchers, and lawyers. There is still no consensus after quite some research done in this area about what anonymization is "right". Having the community in discussing about a standard set of anonymization profiles would be a huge step forward! Having standardized profiles also helps e.g. OpenPacket.org to mark traces in saying what profile has been used. I would be very happy if there is interest in discussing these points and getting the community further in sharing network traces. Best regards, Christoph P. Mayer Posted by Christoph P. Mayer to TaoSecurity at 2:23 PM |
