From: Angelo S. <ang...@oo...> - 2003-02-08 14:07:20
|
If you do not agrre with my tone, it would be nice, for me, to get a clue at wich point I was rude or unpolite. E.g. wich wording to avoid and wich to choose instead. I just truied to be as precise as possible ... only my last line against Carnaughs "balancing" is unpolite, of course. As I do not think that balancing means wild increasing of stats in one game area and decreasing stats in a different area and distributing this over several races ... "I give you 5 apples, therefor I take away 2 oranges from you ... however the apples make you happy so you are happier than I am and I claim for me 2 nice doses of dope ... hm, I have to give up beer for that to balance that I have dope and you not" .... Anyway, I fully agree with KevKev that the effords put into the game are great. I defeinitly do not want to make the work one put into the game smal. I also appreciate the hughe amount of work Carnaug himself put into it. I do not attack the person ... At least not realy :-) BTW: increasing gate turn consumption bejond 20 turns in fact favours me(I need less then half the online time to consume all my turns) ... I do not argue against it because *I* like it different ... I simply do not think that it is the right descission. aos ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Angelo Schneider OOAD/UML Ang...@oo... Putlitzstr. 24 Patterns/FrameWorks Fon: +49 721 9812465 76137 Karlsruhe C++/JAVA Fax: +49 721 9812467 |