Re: [oll-user] Git workflow

[Urs L. <ul...@op...>]

Urs Liska <ul...@op...> schrieb:
>
>
>Phil Holmes <ma...@ph...> schrieb:
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Urs Liska" <ul...@op...>
>>To: "Phil Holmes" <ma...@ph...>; 
>><ope...@li...>
>>Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:35 AM
>>Subject: Re: [oll-user] Git workflow
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Phil Holmes <ma...@ph...> schrieb:
>>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>From: "Urs Liska" <ul...@op...>
>>>>To: <ope...@li...>
>>>>Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 9:58 PM
>>>>Subject: Re: [oll-user] Git workflow
>>>>>
>>>>> Hm, just to be precise: you're not forking a branch but a
>>repository.
>>>>> That is: you have forked the complete repository, which contains
>>all
>>>>> branches.
>>>>> Maybe that's what you meant, I just think these issues have to be
>>>>clear.
>>>>
>>>>If I look at my git repo, it appears to be a snapshot when I forked
>>it
>>>>and
>>>>doesn't contain the later branch.
>>>
>>> Yes, that's the way it works.
>>>
>>>> I therefore can't checkout the
>>>>Schumann
>>>>branch.  How do I fix that?
>>>
>>> Assuming you have the fork as the "origin" and the main repo as the 
>>> "upstream" remote you can
>>>
>>> git fetch upstream
>>>
>>
>>I obviously don't:
>>
>>$ git fetch upstream
>>fatal: 'upstream' does not appear to be a git repository
>>fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
>>
>>How do I set your repo as upstream?
>>
>
>git remote add upstream
>https.//github.com/openlilylib/engraving-challenges.git
>
>>--
>>Phil Holmes 

Of course with http://
-- 
Urs Liska
openlilylib.org