Re: [oll-user] Git workflow
Resources for LilyPond and LaTeX users writing (about) music
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
u-li-1973
From: Urs L. <ul...@op...> - 2014-01-10 22:53:39
|
Am 10.01.2014 23:47, schrieb Marc Sabatella: > On 1/10/2014 2:58 PM, Urs Liska wrote: >> Are we supposed to be forking branches rather than the master? >> Hm, just to be precise: you're not forking a branch but a repository. >> That is: you have forked the complete repository, which contains all >> branches. >> Maybe that's what you meant, I just think these issues have to be clear. > > Yes, thank you. At some level I do understand forking is the whole > repo, but while I'd like to say this was a slip of the tongue, the > reality is, I have to slow down and think clearly with git. > >> Now to the branching strategy. > > Thanks, that made perfect sense. > > One thing: I already use "upstream" as an alias for the main MuseScore > source repo. I would have thought Git would be smart enough to make > these aliases repo-specific, but apparently not - it complained > "upstream" was already in use. Or am I doing something wrong? Definitely. Can you tell me exactly what you tried to do? > > Marc > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > openlilylib-user mailing list > ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openlilylib-user > -- Urs Liska www.openlilylib.org |