Re: [oll-user] OLLib renaming

[Urs L. <ul...@op...>]

Am Donnerstag, den 18.04.2013, 10:31 +0100 schrieb Ian Hulin:
> Hi Urs and all,
> On 18/04/13 09:19, Urs Liska wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I'm busy reorganising the repos and making good progress, I think.
> > 
> > When coming to the OLLib subdirectory I realized that we should 
> > reconsider the naming.
> > 
...
> > 
> > Urs
> We've got some slightly conflicting goals, then.
> 1) is what looks good in 'The XXX library part of openLilyLib'
> 2) what is unique and descriptive in the file system structure
> 3) what is *not* too long for people typing the name in a hurry, and
> have mistake-prone fingers, like me.
You're right. Probably I wouldn't have had to ask if there weren't any
conflicts ;-)
> 
> How about openlilylib/oll-library?  (prefix all Open Lily Library
> stuff at this level with oll, separate it with a hyphen[1]), or your
> oll-lib suggestion above.
This means in our openlilylib root directory we'd have:
openlilylib
| oll-base (new: LaTeX classes/packages and maybe some helper scripts)
| oll-lib
| oll-tutorials
but:
| lilyglyphs
| musicexamples
| website
?

Alternative (Jan-Peter's preference):
openlilylib
| base
| lilyglyphs
| musicexamples
| lilylib
| tutorials
| website

I prefer the latter because the oll- is in most cases a redundancy.
Maybe ollib instead of lilylib, but see my comment on Jan-Peter's mail.

Urs


> 
> HTH
> Cheers,
> Ian
> 
> [1] The files within the directory or any parallel to this would not
> need the oll- prefix however.
> 
>