Re: [oll-user] Repository organization

[Urs L. <ul...@op...>]

Am Freitag, den 12.04.2013, 20:54 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
> Am Freitag, den 12.04.2013, 19:18 +0200 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> > 
> > 2013/4/12 Urs Liska <ul...@op...>
> >         So it remains open:
> >         Any ideas how to deal with the situation?
> >         
> > 
> > What about: use --filter-branch to harvest as much history as
> > possible, and stop at that (keeping the existing repo as an archive of
> > the history)?
> > 

> Maybe that's a good compromise. I'll wait a few days (to see if somebody
> comes up with another idea), and give it a try.
> 
Seems I'm the one myself ;-)
I realized that at least for the lilyglyph and musicexamples
repositories I haven't committed anything after merging the repos. So I
can just restore them :-)
- OLLib doesn't have any real history so far
- tutorials don't need a real history so far
- web doesn't either
- LaTeX stuff could be done the way you suggested.

Urs

> Urs
> > 
> > 
> > best,
> > 
> > Janek
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
> analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
> apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
> our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
> http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
> _______________________________________________
> openlilylib-user mailing list
> ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openlilylib-user