Re: [oll-user] Licensing questions

[Urs L. <ul...@op...>]

Am Freitag, den 12.04.2013, 18:52 +0200 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> Hi,
> 
> 2013/4/6 Urs Liska <ul...@op...>
>         One thing I forgot in the above post:
>         If we should settle upon a more permissive license in some
>         parts we'd
>         have to take care that we still comply with GNU's ideas.
>         Not because I'm a purist or because I'm afraid of David K's
>         comments,
>         but because there was a discussion on lilypond-user about GNU
>         programs
>         (i.e. LilyPond) not being allowed to endorse or link to
>         non-free
>         software and/or documentation.
> 
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> Frankly, i got lost in the discussion on -user and all the legal
> problems that arise :(
I think that's what usually happens to most of us.
But I wasn't talking about the recent discussion but back when I first
presented my first tutorial with the Schoenberg example in it.

Best
Urs
> 
> 
> Janek 
> 
> 
>