Re: [oll-user] Licensing questions

[Janek W. <lem...@gm...>]

Hi,

2013/4/6 Urs Liska <ul...@op...>

> One thing I forgot in the above post:
> If we should settle upon a more permissive license in some parts we'd
> have to take care that we still comply with GNU's ideas.
> Not because I'm a purist or because I'm afraid of David K's comments,
> but because there was a discussion on lilypond-user about GNU programs
> (i.e. LilyPond) not being allowed to endorse or link to non-free
> software and/or documentation.
>

Indeed.
Frankly, i got lost in the discussion on -user and all the legal problems
that arise :(

Janek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...