Re: [oll-user] Call for initial feedback

[Urs L. <ul...@op...>]

On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:59:04 +0100
Janek Warchoł <lem...@gm...> wrote:

> 2013/3/23 Urs Liska <ul...@op...>
> 
> > On the other hand, I'm quite tempted to redesign the history from
> > scratch because it is really quite messy IMO (partly because of the fact
> > that it's a merged history (there are three 'initial commits' for
> > example) and partly because of me only learning all this stuff. And if I
> > did that it would probably reduce the number of commits through numerous
> > squashes anyway.
> >
> 
> I know that temptation.
> https://github.com/janek-warchol/eja-mater-demonstration is an example of
> possible results.  Was it worth it?  Well, only if it'll be used for
> analyzing LilyPond performance (another Report article maybe) and/or
> demonstrating lily+git workflow to potential "employers".
I have done that now for a feature branch that I boiled down from 9 unordered to 5 tidy commits. I think that's worth it, to tidy up a feature branch before merging into master (or 'develop'), but not for a whole repository.


> ...
>
> These two also return 404 errors, so i assume i'm too late.  Sorry :(
No problem, I think I'm fine with this issue :-)

> Janek