From: Terje B. <li...@po...> - 2004-05-13 14:16:04
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ok, since none of the OpenJade Developers listed as "Admins" for the projec= t has deigned to respond in over a month since my last message, I'm slightly escalating this time (unambigious Subject field, and CC to the list). Brandon, Ian, Didier, or Peter, _please_ at least respond to this message s= o we know you're still out there and reachable! If you currently do not have time to do anything more, a response saying ju= st that will at least indicate that the project still has Admins and that it's possible you will eventually have time. If I receive no response within a reasonable amount of time I'll have to assume that none of the project admins are, for whatever reason, able to fi= ll that role. I'll suggest to the list that we contact SF.net and have them reassign Admin rights to active Developers. I'll volunteer to fill the role and I would encourage other Developers that I've seen active on the list lately to also volunteer. My immediate concern is that we have a patch that enables OpenSP to build o= n Win32 that is not getting integrated and maintained because we're not getti= ng the developer in question assigned as a Developer (and hence get CVS write access) to the Project. But long term the project also requires a minimum o= f one -- and preferably several -- Developers assigned Admin rights to the project and __who_are_actually_reachable__! - --=20 >For all I know they probably have a standard for >which direction to put the thread on a bolt. That would be ISO 261:1973. -- John Cowan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 iQA/AwUBQKOC7KPyPrIkdfXsEQLyNACfR1zyLDRi5B5OMAiHE6sXYwwwl/AAoKw0 8jlxxM8UC9Wyp6vms6eYcsM6 =3D1bgc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |