Re: [Openinteract-help] has_many relationships?

[Vsevolod (S. I. <si...@cs...>]

> Obviously, I'm biased :-), but I would rather see effort put into movin=
g=20
> to this more general structure rather than adding onto the existing mor=
e=20
> limited one.

I'm with you. I have already been bitten by the problem of manually=20
managing the order of saving members of composite objects (ie, has_a=20
members have to be saved before the parent object, but links_to members=20
have to be saved after it) - I'd rather specify it in the configuration.

> Actually, no. I used the three classes X, A and B just to define some=20
> minimal notation that I could use to talk about all of the above=20
> relationships. For simple one-to-one and one-to-many relationships, jus=
t=20
> look at X and A (pretend you don't have B). See the first 3 examples at=
=20
> the end of the first post.

Gotcha. Chris, what do you think? With my current amount of free time
I could expect to implement this by summer.

Simon

--=20

Simon (Vsevolod ILyushchenko)   si...@cs...
				http://www.simonf.com

The unknown is honoured, the known is neglected -
                              until all is known.

               The C=FA Chulaind myth